Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?2019 Community Moderator ElectionDoes Android really use the same kernel as Linux?How to configure Linux to cache file metadata in preference to contents?File system that never breaks (data loss acceptable)When do I need to specify add_efi_memmap as kernel argument in UEFI/EFI boot?What files does the Linux kernel access?Root file system vs partition's file systemWhat parts of the Linux kernel I do not need?Linux/Embedded Linux - Understanding the Kernel and additional BSP specific componentsHow do I run the Linux kernel?Why does the Linux kernel build system use incremental linking or ar T thin archives?

What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?

What is going on with gets(stdin) on the site coderbyte?

Non-trope happy ending?

Why does Carol not get rid of the Kree symbol on her suit when she changes its colours?

What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?

Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

How could a planet have erratic days?

What is the difference between lands and mana?

Why Shazam when there is already Superman?

Is it necessary to use pronouns with the verb "essere"?

C++ copy constructor called at return

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?

How to draw a matrix with arrows in limited space

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

Does "he squandered his car on drink" sound natural?

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

awk assign to multiple variables at once

Did the UK lift the requirement for registering SIM cards?

Stack Interview Code methods made from class Node and Smart Pointers



Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?



2019 Community Moderator ElectionDoes Android really use the same kernel as Linux?How to configure Linux to cache file metadata in preference to contents?File system that never breaks (data loss acceptable)When do I need to specify add_efi_memmap as kernel argument in UEFI/EFI boot?What files does the Linux kernel access?Root file system vs partition's file systemWhat parts of the Linux kernel I do not need?Linux/Embedded Linux - Understanding the Kernel and additional BSP specific componentsHow do I run the Linux kernel?Why does the Linux kernel build system use incremental linking or ar T thin archives?










4















My opinion is yes, it does, because all useful exposure to the outside world (non-priviledged processor mode) would first require a process running in the outside world. That would require a file system, even a temporary, in-RAM, file system.



Another engineer disagrees with me, but I can't seem to prove this beyond all (unknown to me) cases.



Does the answer to this question depend on the definition of 'running'?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

    – jsotola
    1 hour ago












  • Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

    – Jeff Schaller
    24 mins ago















4















My opinion is yes, it does, because all useful exposure to the outside world (non-priviledged processor mode) would first require a process running in the outside world. That would require a file system, even a temporary, in-RAM, file system.



Another engineer disagrees with me, but I can't seem to prove this beyond all (unknown to me) cases.



Does the answer to this question depend on the definition of 'running'?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

    – jsotola
    1 hour ago












  • Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

    – Jeff Schaller
    24 mins ago













4












4








4








My opinion is yes, it does, because all useful exposure to the outside world (non-priviledged processor mode) would first require a process running in the outside world. That would require a file system, even a temporary, in-RAM, file system.



Another engineer disagrees with me, but I can't seem to prove this beyond all (unknown to me) cases.



Does the answer to this question depend on the definition of 'running'?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












My opinion is yes, it does, because all useful exposure to the outside world (non-priviledged processor mode) would first require a process running in the outside world. That would require a file system, even a temporary, in-RAM, file system.



Another engineer disagrees with me, but I can't seem to prove this beyond all (unknown to me) cases.



Does the answer to this question depend on the definition of 'running'?







filesystems linux-kernel






share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Peter L.Peter L.

1213




1213




New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

    – jsotola
    1 hour ago












  • Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

    – Jeff Schaller
    24 mins ago

















  • i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

    – jsotola
    1 hour ago












  • Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

    – Jeff Schaller
    24 mins ago
















i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

– jsotola
1 hour ago






i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

– jsotola
1 hour ago














Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

– Jeff Schaller
24 mins ago





Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

– Jeff Schaller
24 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.






share|improve this answer

























  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    33 mins ago


















2














In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    1 hour ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507837%2fdoes-the-linux-kernel-need-a-file-system-to-run%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.






share|improve this answer

























  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    33 mins ago















3














That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.






share|improve this answer

























  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    33 mins ago













3












3








3







That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.






share|improve this answer















That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 59 mins ago

























answered 1 hour ago









Philip CoulingPhilip Couling

2,011920




2,011920












  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    33 mins ago

















  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    33 mins ago
















Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

– Peter L.
33 mins ago





Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

– Peter L.
33 mins ago













2














In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    1 hour ago















2














In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    1 hour ago













2












2








2







In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.






share|improve this answer













In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









K7AAYK7AAY

744825




744825







  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    1 hour ago












  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    1 hour ago







1




1





But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

– Philip Couling
1 hour ago





But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

– Philip Couling
1 hour ago










Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507837%2fdoes-the-linux-kernel-need-a-file-system-to-run%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can not update quote_id field of “quote_item” table magento 2Magento 2.1 - We can't remove the item. (Shopping Cart doesnt allow us to remove items before becomes empty)Add value for custom quote item attribute using REST apiREST API endpoint v1/carts/cartId/items always returns error messageCorrect way to save entries to databaseHow to remove all associated quote objects of a customer completelyMagento 2 - Save value from custom input field to quote_itemGet quote_item data using quote id and product id filter in Magento 2How to set additional data to quote_item table from controller in Magento 2?What is the purpose of additional_data column in quote_item table in magento2Set Custom Price to Quote item magento2 from controller

How to solve knockout JS error in Magento 2 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?(Magento2) knockout.js:3012 Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process bindingUnable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Cannot read property `scopeLabel` of undefined on Product Detail PageCan't get Customer Data on frontend in Magento 2Magento2 Order Summary - unable to process bindingKO templates are not loading in Magento 2.1 applicationgetting knockout js error magento 2Product grid not load -— Unable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Product form not loaded in magento2Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process binding “if: function()return (isShowLegend()) ” magento 2

Nissan Patrol Зміст Перше покоління — 4W60 (1951-1960) | Друге покоління — 60 series (1960-1980) | Третє покоління (1980–2002) | Четверте покоління — Y60 (1987–1998) | П'яте покоління — Y61 (1997–2013) | Шосте покоління — Y62 (2010- ) | Посилання | Зноски | Навігаційне менюОфіційний український сайтТест-драйв Nissan Patrol 2010 7-го поколінняNissan PatrolКак мы тестировали Nissan Patrol 2016рвиправивши або дописавши її