Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?Is AES-256 weaker than 192 and 128 bit versions?Difference between Rijndael 128 / 256 blocksize implementations? (and impact of block size in general)What is the security loss from reducing Rijndael to 128 bits block size from 256 bits?Does AES-128 have the same strength as AES-256 with a padded key?What are the constraints on using GCM with a tag size of 96 and 128 bits?AES - What is the advantage of a 256-bit key with a 128-bit block cipher?AES key and block sizeIs there any compelling or logical reason to use AES-192 over AES-128 but not use AES-256?Are tags longer than 128 bit possible for AES-256-CCM and AES-256-GCM?AES key expansion for 192-bit

Why do ¬, ∀ and ∃ have the same precedence?

Merge org tables

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

How to get directions in deep space?

"before" and "want" for the same systemd service?

What is Cash Advance APR?

Find the next value of this number series

Temporarily disable WLAN internet access for children, but allow it for adults

Did the UK lift the requirement for registering SIM cards?

How to draw a matrix with arrows in limited space

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

Biological Blimps: Propulsion

I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?

How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting soon, especially given that a colleague just left this week

Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?

PTIJ: Why is Haman obsessed with Bose?

Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

awk assign to multiple variables at once

In a multiple cat home, how many litter boxes should you have?

Is there a nicer/politer/more positive alternative for "negates"?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?



Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?


Is AES-256 weaker than 192 and 128 bit versions?Difference between Rijndael 128 / 256 blocksize implementations? (and impact of block size in general)What is the security loss from reducing Rijndael to 128 bits block size from 256 bits?Does AES-128 have the same strength as AES-256 with a padded key?What are the constraints on using GCM with a tag size of 96 and 128 bits?AES - What is the advantage of a 256-bit key with a 128-bit block cipher?AES key and block sizeIs there any compelling or logical reason to use AES-192 over AES-128 but not use AES-256?Are tags longer than 128 bit possible for AES-256-CCM and AES-256-GCM?AES key expansion for 192-bit













5












$begingroup$


I was reading about the AES algorithm to be used in one of our projects and found that the exact number of rounds is fixed in AES for specific key sizes:



*128-bit key size -> 10 rounds
*192-bit key size -> 12 rounds
*256-bit key size -> 14 rounds



Why these specific numbers of rounds only?










share|improve this question









New contributor




kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    I was reading about the AES algorithm to be used in one of our projects and found that the exact number of rounds is fixed in AES for specific key sizes:



    *128-bit key size -> 10 rounds
    *192-bit key size -> 12 rounds
    *256-bit key size -> 14 rounds



    Why these specific numbers of rounds only?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      I was reading about the AES algorithm to be used in one of our projects and found that the exact number of rounds is fixed in AES for specific key sizes:



      *128-bit key size -> 10 rounds
      *192-bit key size -> 12 rounds
      *256-bit key size -> 14 rounds



      Why these specific numbers of rounds only?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I was reading about the AES algorithm to be used in one of our projects and found that the exact number of rounds is fixed in AES for specific key sizes:



      *128-bit key size -> 10 rounds
      *192-bit key size -> 12 rounds
      *256-bit key size -> 14 rounds



      Why these specific numbers of rounds only?







      aes






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 19 mins ago









      forest

      4,44511641




      4,44511641






      New contributor




      kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      kapilkapil

      282




      282




      New contributor




      kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Why these specific number of rounds only?



          Because AES is a standard; AES is an acronym for "Advanced Encryption Standard".



          The standard specifies these specific number of rounds to ensure that different implementations are interoperable.



          Why not more or less?



          The reason these specific numbers of rounds were chosen was a choice of the designers. They did a lot of math to determine that these were the sweet spot between sufficient security and optimal performance.



          Less might be insecure, and more might be slower with no benefit.



          To quote the above book (from Section 3.5 The Number of Rounds):




          For Rijndael versions with a longer key, the number of rounds was raised by one for every additional 32 bits in the cipher key. This was done for the following reasons:



          1. One of the main objectives is the absence of shortcut attacks, i.e. attacks that are more efficient than an exhaustive key search. Since the workload of an exhaustive key search grows with the key length, shortcut attacks can afford to be less efficient for longer keys.


          2. (Partially) known-key and related-key attacks exploit the knowledge of cipher key bits or the ability to apply different cipher keys. If the cipher key grows, the range of possibilities available to the cryptanalyst increases.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "281"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            kapil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68199%2fwhy-does-aes-have-exactly-10-rounds-for-a-128-bit-key-12-for-192-bits-and-14-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            Why these specific number of rounds only?



            Because AES is a standard; AES is an acronym for "Advanced Encryption Standard".



            The standard specifies these specific number of rounds to ensure that different implementations are interoperable.



            Why not more or less?



            The reason these specific numbers of rounds were chosen was a choice of the designers. They did a lot of math to determine that these were the sweet spot between sufficient security and optimal performance.



            Less might be insecure, and more might be slower with no benefit.



            To quote the above book (from Section 3.5 The Number of Rounds):




            For Rijndael versions with a longer key, the number of rounds was raised by one for every additional 32 bits in the cipher key. This was done for the following reasons:



            1. One of the main objectives is the absence of shortcut attacks, i.e. attacks that are more efficient than an exhaustive key search. Since the workload of an exhaustive key search grows with the key length, shortcut attacks can afford to be less efficient for longer keys.


            2. (Partially) known-key and related-key attacks exploit the knowledge of cipher key bits or the ability to apply different cipher keys. If the cipher key grows, the range of possibilities available to the cryptanalyst increases.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              5












              $begingroup$

              Why these specific number of rounds only?



              Because AES is a standard; AES is an acronym for "Advanced Encryption Standard".



              The standard specifies these specific number of rounds to ensure that different implementations are interoperable.



              Why not more or less?



              The reason these specific numbers of rounds were chosen was a choice of the designers. They did a lot of math to determine that these were the sweet spot between sufficient security and optimal performance.



              Less might be insecure, and more might be slower with no benefit.



              To quote the above book (from Section 3.5 The Number of Rounds):




              For Rijndael versions with a longer key, the number of rounds was raised by one for every additional 32 bits in the cipher key. This was done for the following reasons:



              1. One of the main objectives is the absence of shortcut attacks, i.e. attacks that are more efficient than an exhaustive key search. Since the workload of an exhaustive key search grows with the key length, shortcut attacks can afford to be less efficient for longer keys.


              2. (Partially) known-key and related-key attacks exploit the knowledge of cipher key bits or the ability to apply different cipher keys. If the cipher key grows, the range of possibilities available to the cryptanalyst increases.







              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                Why these specific number of rounds only?



                Because AES is a standard; AES is an acronym for "Advanced Encryption Standard".



                The standard specifies these specific number of rounds to ensure that different implementations are interoperable.



                Why not more or less?



                The reason these specific numbers of rounds were chosen was a choice of the designers. They did a lot of math to determine that these were the sweet spot between sufficient security and optimal performance.



                Less might be insecure, and more might be slower with no benefit.



                To quote the above book (from Section 3.5 The Number of Rounds):




                For Rijndael versions with a longer key, the number of rounds was raised by one for every additional 32 bits in the cipher key. This was done for the following reasons:



                1. One of the main objectives is the absence of shortcut attacks, i.e. attacks that are more efficient than an exhaustive key search. Since the workload of an exhaustive key search grows with the key length, shortcut attacks can afford to be less efficient for longer keys.


                2. (Partially) known-key and related-key attacks exploit the knowledge of cipher key bits or the ability to apply different cipher keys. If the cipher key grows, the range of possibilities available to the cryptanalyst increases.







                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Why these specific number of rounds only?



                Because AES is a standard; AES is an acronym for "Advanced Encryption Standard".



                The standard specifies these specific number of rounds to ensure that different implementations are interoperable.



                Why not more or less?



                The reason these specific numbers of rounds were chosen was a choice of the designers. They did a lot of math to determine that these were the sweet spot between sufficient security and optimal performance.



                Less might be insecure, and more might be slower with no benefit.



                To quote the above book (from Section 3.5 The Number of Rounds):




                For Rijndael versions with a longer key, the number of rounds was raised by one for every additional 32 bits in the cipher key. This was done for the following reasons:



                1. One of the main objectives is the absence of shortcut attacks, i.e. attacks that are more efficient than an exhaustive key search. Since the workload of an exhaustive key search grows with the key length, shortcut attacks can afford to be less efficient for longer keys.


                2. (Partially) known-key and related-key attacks exploit the knowledge of cipher key bits or the ability to apply different cipher keys. If the cipher key grows, the range of possibilities available to the cryptanalyst increases.








                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 54 mins ago









                puzzlepalace

                2,8701133




                2,8701133










                answered 2 hours ago









                Ella RoseElla Rose

                16.5k44281




                16.5k44281




















                    kapil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    kapil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    kapil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    kapil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Cryptography Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68199%2fwhy-does-aes-have-exactly-10-rounds-for-a-128-bit-key-12-for-192-bits-and-14-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can not update quote_id field of “quote_item” table magento 2Magento 2.1 - We can't remove the item. (Shopping Cart doesnt allow us to remove items before becomes empty)Add value for custom quote item attribute using REST apiREST API endpoint v1/carts/cartId/items always returns error messageCorrect way to save entries to databaseHow to remove all associated quote objects of a customer completelyMagento 2 - Save value from custom input field to quote_itemGet quote_item data using quote id and product id filter in Magento 2How to set additional data to quote_item table from controller in Magento 2?What is the purpose of additional_data column in quote_item table in magento2Set Custom Price to Quote item magento2 from controller

                    How to solve knockout JS error in Magento 2 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?(Magento2) knockout.js:3012 Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process bindingUnable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Cannot read property `scopeLabel` of undefined on Product Detail PageCan't get Customer Data on frontend in Magento 2Magento2 Order Summary - unable to process bindingKO templates are not loading in Magento 2.1 applicationgetting knockout js error magento 2Product grid not load -— Unable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Product form not loaded in magento2Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process binding “if: function()return (isShowLegend()) ” magento 2

                    Nissan Patrol Зміст Перше покоління — 4W60 (1951-1960) | Друге покоління — 60 series (1960-1980) | Третє покоління (1980–2002) | Четверте покоління — Y60 (1987–1998) | П'яте покоління — Y61 (1997–2013) | Шосте покоління — Y62 (2010- ) | Посилання | Зноски | Навігаційне менюОфіційний український сайтТест-драйв Nissan Patrol 2010 7-го поколінняNissan PatrolКак мы тестировали Nissan Patrol 2016рвиправивши або дописавши її