Why do 401k up to company match, then fill Roth IRA, then finish filling 401k?Could a 401k or IRA contribution switch my current taxable income to a lower tax bracket? is this the same for traditional and Roth 401k?Are distributions from Roth 401k or Roth IRA accounts taxed in India?Using a Roth conversion ladder in a 401(k) while also retaining backdoor Roth IRA conversions5 year rule on Roth 401k to Roth IRA rollover containing converted amountsUsing a Roth IRA instead of a college savings accountNew company doesn't allow 401k deposits for 6 months, what to do with money I used to deposit?Why would I want to hold a variable Annuity in a Roth IRA?Roth 401k Contribution limits reset on job changeAvoiding taxes on backdoor Roth IRA conversionIf I have a 401k and a traditional IRA, am I at risk of paying double taxes if I convert to a Roth IRA?

How to figure out whether the data is sample data or population data apart from the client's information?

how to interpret this t result?

Question relating to a number theoretic function

Do vanished people know what happened after the snap?

Providence Pentominoes Puzzle By Andrew Bradburn (Jigsaw)

Is DC-to-DC (24 V to 12 V) buck conversion typically more efficient than AC-to-DC (110 V to 12 V) conversion?

Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?

function to receive a character input and return date format (with incorrect input)

Please, smoke with good manners

Why we can't write in air?

Is it possible to dynamically set properties of an `Object` using Apex?

Can not tell colimits from limits

What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `ab,cd` (braces)?

Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?

Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"

Font Color issue in Mathematica 12

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?

Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?

How to creep the reader out with what seems like a normal person?

Will a top journal at least read my introduction?

How to make a pipeline wait for end-of-file or stop after an error?

Realistic Necromancy?

Why do Computer Science majors learn Calculus?

Single Colour Mastermind Problem



Why do 401k up to company match, then fill Roth IRA, then finish filling 401k?


Could a 401k or IRA contribution switch my current taxable income to a lower tax bracket? is this the same for traditional and Roth 401k?Are distributions from Roth 401k or Roth IRA accounts taxed in India?Using a Roth conversion ladder in a 401(k) while also retaining backdoor Roth IRA conversions5 year rule on Roth 401k to Roth IRA rollover containing converted amountsUsing a Roth IRA instead of a college savings accountNew company doesn't allow 401k deposits for 6 months, what to do with money I used to deposit?Why would I want to hold a variable Annuity in a Roth IRA?Roth 401k Contribution limits reset on job changeAvoiding taxes on backdoor Roth IRA conversionIf I have a 401k and a traditional IRA, am I at risk of paying double taxes if I convert to a Roth IRA?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















Places like NerdWallet and the FI/RE community on Reddit suggest contributing to a 401k up to the company match (if one is offered), then maxing out a Roth IRA, and then going back and continuing to fill the 401k. Why is that?



Let's say someone who's 30 makes $100k a year and contributes 6% of their paycheck a year to either a 401k or Roth IRA. That would put them in the 24% tax bracket, so we can assume that $6,000 (6%) would be taxed in the Roth IRA at 24%. If we also assume an annual return of 8% and a retirement age of 65, I get:



401k: $1,122,613



Roth IRA: $853,186



If you were to withdraw from the 401k at a rate that fell into the 24% tax bracket, then the accounts effectively have the same amount of money in them. If that's the case, then why take the approach listed above. Why not just fill up the 401k and then move on to maxing out the Roth IRA?










share|improve this question




























    2















    Places like NerdWallet and the FI/RE community on Reddit suggest contributing to a 401k up to the company match (if one is offered), then maxing out a Roth IRA, and then going back and continuing to fill the 401k. Why is that?



    Let's say someone who's 30 makes $100k a year and contributes 6% of their paycheck a year to either a 401k or Roth IRA. That would put them in the 24% tax bracket, so we can assume that $6,000 (6%) would be taxed in the Roth IRA at 24%. If we also assume an annual return of 8% and a retirement age of 65, I get:



    401k: $1,122,613



    Roth IRA: $853,186



    If you were to withdraw from the 401k at a rate that fell into the 24% tax bracket, then the accounts effectively have the same amount of money in them. If that's the case, then why take the approach listed above. Why not just fill up the 401k and then move on to maxing out the Roth IRA?










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2








      Places like NerdWallet and the FI/RE community on Reddit suggest contributing to a 401k up to the company match (if one is offered), then maxing out a Roth IRA, and then going back and continuing to fill the 401k. Why is that?



      Let's say someone who's 30 makes $100k a year and contributes 6% of their paycheck a year to either a 401k or Roth IRA. That would put them in the 24% tax bracket, so we can assume that $6,000 (6%) would be taxed in the Roth IRA at 24%. If we also assume an annual return of 8% and a retirement age of 65, I get:



      401k: $1,122,613



      Roth IRA: $853,186



      If you were to withdraw from the 401k at a rate that fell into the 24% tax bracket, then the accounts effectively have the same amount of money in them. If that's the case, then why take the approach listed above. Why not just fill up the 401k and then move on to maxing out the Roth IRA?










      share|improve this question














      Places like NerdWallet and the FI/RE community on Reddit suggest contributing to a 401k up to the company match (if one is offered), then maxing out a Roth IRA, and then going back and continuing to fill the 401k. Why is that?



      Let's say someone who's 30 makes $100k a year and contributes 6% of their paycheck a year to either a 401k or Roth IRA. That would put them in the 24% tax bracket, so we can assume that $6,000 (6%) would be taxed in the Roth IRA at 24%. If we also assume an annual return of 8% and a retirement age of 65, I get:



      401k: $1,122,613



      Roth IRA: $853,186



      If you were to withdraw from the 401k at a rate that fell into the 24% tax bracket, then the accounts effectively have the same amount of money in them. If that's the case, then why take the approach listed above. Why not just fill up the 401k and then move on to maxing out the Roth IRA?







      united-states 401k roth-ira






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      RyanRyan

      6341719




      6341719




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          You assumed the same rate of growth in both accounts, which is likely wrong.



          A 401(k) doesn't give you many choices.



          If yours has low-cost index funds in all the major market areas (large-cap growth, large-cap value, mid-cap growth, mid-cap value, small-cap growth, small-cap value, government bonds, corporate bonds) then it can be a good option. But beware, your money is stuck there for the duration of your employment, and your company has no obligation to offer you the same funds at the same expense ratio next year as you have now.



          On the other hand, an IRA is yours to invest how you like, with any brokerage you like. So an IRA has all of the above choices available at expense ratios of 0.08% or less. As well as the possibility to invest in individual companies, or in market sector ETFs, or use leverage, or trade options.



          The difference in expense ratio between 0.80% and 0.08% may seem unimportant compared to the differences in tax brackets... but you'll pay the taxes once, and you'll pay the fund expenses every year for nearly 30 years.



          In addition, it is advisable to save part of your retirement in Traditional (pre-tax) accounts, and part in Roth accounts. For this part of the discussion, a Roth 401(k) can serve just as well as a Roth IRA. This is both to hedge your tax exposure (What if the government increases every tax bracket by 10%? What if they decide to break the promise that Roth earnings will never be taxed?), and also give you flexibility. Each year in retirement, you'll need to take the required minimum distribution from your pre-tax retirement savings, but the rest of your income you can choose to take from either pre-tax or Roth, so you can optimize tax burden over a number of years. In particular, you can avoid paying in a high tax bracket simply because you had to withdraw a large amount in a single year to handle an emergency. Or taxes might be extraordinarily low for a short time, because a particular Congress added a new deduction that applies to you, and you don't expect it to survive the next election, you could choose to pay taxes in the favorable year by doing a (probably partial) conversion to Roth.



          Combining these two effects, the rule of thumb to max out the Roth IRA contribution each year after meeting the 401(k) match is probably the best approach for 90% of W2 employees. (The investment options are different for self-employed and contractors, as well as owners.)





          If you were to withdraw from the 401k at a rate that fell into the 24% tax bracket, then the accounts effectively have the same amount of money in them.




          That's false, because tax brackets apply sequentially.



          Notably, tax deductions for making traditional 401(k) contributions (and deductible traditional IRA contributions where applicable, but usually you can't) save you tax money at your marginal rate (or perhaps one bracket down). But when in retirement, some of that money will be withdrawn at the 0% (i.e. the standard or itemized deduction total), 10%, and 12% brackets, or whatever the lowest brackets are in the future. So, all other things being equal, taking the deduction now will tend to be better.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Ben - please note my minor edit. If unwelcome, you are free to rollback. Beautiful answer here.

            – JoeTaxpayer
            51 mins ago


















          2














          You misunderstood the advice from nerd wallet:




          1. Contribute enough to earn the full match.

          2. Next, contribute as much as you’re allowed to an IRA.

          3. After maxing out an IRA, revisit your 401(k).



          In each step you will have to decide if the money will be Traditional, Roth or a mixture of both.



          Before there was the option of a Roth 401(k), the Roth portion if there was a Roth portion always had to take place in step 2.



          The reason for step 1 is to get the "free money". If there is no company match then skip step 1.



          One reason for the IRA portion is to give you more choices. It is easier to find low cost Funds for IRA investments compared to the limited options in the 401(k).



          In reality you may end-up doing steps 1 and 3 each paycheck. At the start of the year you decide how much you want to contribute to your retirement accounts. Then you figure what percent of each paycheck that would represent. Some people start with I want to save X percent of my gross pay, so they use that to determine how much they are going to save.



          If the percentage of each paycheck is higher than the amount that is needed to trigger the maximum match, and for almost every 401(k) match I have seen your savings goal for the year will be higher than what will get you the maximum match; you will want to contribute to an IRA.



          Note that to get the maximum match you have to contribute the magic amount every paycheck. So it isn't quite true that you contribute till you reach the maximum match, then switch to the IRA, then switch back. You will be contributing every paycheck.



          Now after allocating funds for the IRA which doesn't have to be invested every paycheck, or even every month, if you wont reach your savings goal, then you will have to put more in the 401(k).



          Example 1:



          • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 10%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

          • So you will contribute 10,000 (10% of 100K)

          • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

          • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 230.77, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny)

          • So the remaining $4,000 is for the IRA, which doesn't hit the limit. So need for step 3.

          Example 2:



          • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 20%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

          • So you will contribute 20,000 (20% of 100K)

          • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

          • The remaining $14,000 won't fit in the 6,000 limit of an IRA. So step 3 is needed.

          • Assign $6,000 for the IRA.

          • That means that $8,000 is available for step 3, which is equal to 8% of gross, so tour total 401(k) contribution is now 14%

          • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 538.46, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny).

          You still have to decide Traditional or Roth.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "93"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108286%2fwhy-do-401k-up-to-company-match-then-fill-roth-ira-then-finish-filling-401k%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            You assumed the same rate of growth in both accounts, which is likely wrong.



            A 401(k) doesn't give you many choices.



            If yours has low-cost index funds in all the major market areas (large-cap growth, large-cap value, mid-cap growth, mid-cap value, small-cap growth, small-cap value, government bonds, corporate bonds) then it can be a good option. But beware, your money is stuck there for the duration of your employment, and your company has no obligation to offer you the same funds at the same expense ratio next year as you have now.



            On the other hand, an IRA is yours to invest how you like, with any brokerage you like. So an IRA has all of the above choices available at expense ratios of 0.08% or less. As well as the possibility to invest in individual companies, or in market sector ETFs, or use leverage, or trade options.



            The difference in expense ratio between 0.80% and 0.08% may seem unimportant compared to the differences in tax brackets... but you'll pay the taxes once, and you'll pay the fund expenses every year for nearly 30 years.



            In addition, it is advisable to save part of your retirement in Traditional (pre-tax) accounts, and part in Roth accounts. For this part of the discussion, a Roth 401(k) can serve just as well as a Roth IRA. This is both to hedge your tax exposure (What if the government increases every tax bracket by 10%? What if they decide to break the promise that Roth earnings will never be taxed?), and also give you flexibility. Each year in retirement, you'll need to take the required minimum distribution from your pre-tax retirement savings, but the rest of your income you can choose to take from either pre-tax or Roth, so you can optimize tax burden over a number of years. In particular, you can avoid paying in a high tax bracket simply because you had to withdraw a large amount in a single year to handle an emergency. Or taxes might be extraordinarily low for a short time, because a particular Congress added a new deduction that applies to you, and you don't expect it to survive the next election, you could choose to pay taxes in the favorable year by doing a (probably partial) conversion to Roth.



            Combining these two effects, the rule of thumb to max out the Roth IRA contribution each year after meeting the 401(k) match is probably the best approach for 90% of W2 employees. (The investment options are different for self-employed and contractors, as well as owners.)





            If you were to withdraw from the 401k at a rate that fell into the 24% tax bracket, then the accounts effectively have the same amount of money in them.




            That's false, because tax brackets apply sequentially.



            Notably, tax deductions for making traditional 401(k) contributions (and deductible traditional IRA contributions where applicable, but usually you can't) save you tax money at your marginal rate (or perhaps one bracket down). But when in retirement, some of that money will be withdrawn at the 0% (i.e. the standard or itemized deduction total), 10%, and 12% brackets, or whatever the lowest brackets are in the future. So, all other things being equal, taking the deduction now will tend to be better.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Ben - please note my minor edit. If unwelcome, you are free to rollback. Beautiful answer here.

              – JoeTaxpayer
              51 mins ago















            3














            You assumed the same rate of growth in both accounts, which is likely wrong.



            A 401(k) doesn't give you many choices.



            If yours has low-cost index funds in all the major market areas (large-cap growth, large-cap value, mid-cap growth, mid-cap value, small-cap growth, small-cap value, government bonds, corporate bonds) then it can be a good option. But beware, your money is stuck there for the duration of your employment, and your company has no obligation to offer you the same funds at the same expense ratio next year as you have now.



            On the other hand, an IRA is yours to invest how you like, with any brokerage you like. So an IRA has all of the above choices available at expense ratios of 0.08% or less. As well as the possibility to invest in individual companies, or in market sector ETFs, or use leverage, or trade options.



            The difference in expense ratio between 0.80% and 0.08% may seem unimportant compared to the differences in tax brackets... but you'll pay the taxes once, and you'll pay the fund expenses every year for nearly 30 years.



            In addition, it is advisable to save part of your retirement in Traditional (pre-tax) accounts, and part in Roth accounts. For this part of the discussion, a Roth 401(k) can serve just as well as a Roth IRA. This is both to hedge your tax exposure (What if the government increases every tax bracket by 10%? What if they decide to break the promise that Roth earnings will never be taxed?), and also give you flexibility. Each year in retirement, you'll need to take the required minimum distribution from your pre-tax retirement savings, but the rest of your income you can choose to take from either pre-tax or Roth, so you can optimize tax burden over a number of years. In particular, you can avoid paying in a high tax bracket simply because you had to withdraw a large amount in a single year to handle an emergency. Or taxes might be extraordinarily low for a short time, because a particular Congress added a new deduction that applies to you, and you don't expect it to survive the next election, you could choose to pay taxes in the favorable year by doing a (probably partial) conversion to Roth.



            Combining these two effects, the rule of thumb to max out the Roth IRA contribution each year after meeting the 401(k) match is probably the best approach for 90% of W2 employees. (The investment options are different for self-employed and contractors, as well as owners.)





            If you were to withdraw from the 401k at a rate that fell into the 24% tax bracket, then the accounts effectively have the same amount of money in them.




            That's false, because tax brackets apply sequentially.



            Notably, tax deductions for making traditional 401(k) contributions (and deductible traditional IRA contributions where applicable, but usually you can't) save you tax money at your marginal rate (or perhaps one bracket down). But when in retirement, some of that money will be withdrawn at the 0% (i.e. the standard or itemized deduction total), 10%, and 12% brackets, or whatever the lowest brackets are in the future. So, all other things being equal, taking the deduction now will tend to be better.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Ben - please note my minor edit. If unwelcome, you are free to rollback. Beautiful answer here.

              – JoeTaxpayer
              51 mins ago













            3












            3








            3







            You assumed the same rate of growth in both accounts, which is likely wrong.



            A 401(k) doesn't give you many choices.



            If yours has low-cost index funds in all the major market areas (large-cap growth, large-cap value, mid-cap growth, mid-cap value, small-cap growth, small-cap value, government bonds, corporate bonds) then it can be a good option. But beware, your money is stuck there for the duration of your employment, and your company has no obligation to offer you the same funds at the same expense ratio next year as you have now.



            On the other hand, an IRA is yours to invest how you like, with any brokerage you like. So an IRA has all of the above choices available at expense ratios of 0.08% or less. As well as the possibility to invest in individual companies, or in market sector ETFs, or use leverage, or trade options.



            The difference in expense ratio between 0.80% and 0.08% may seem unimportant compared to the differences in tax brackets... but you'll pay the taxes once, and you'll pay the fund expenses every year for nearly 30 years.



            In addition, it is advisable to save part of your retirement in Traditional (pre-tax) accounts, and part in Roth accounts. For this part of the discussion, a Roth 401(k) can serve just as well as a Roth IRA. This is both to hedge your tax exposure (What if the government increases every tax bracket by 10%? What if they decide to break the promise that Roth earnings will never be taxed?), and also give you flexibility. Each year in retirement, you'll need to take the required minimum distribution from your pre-tax retirement savings, but the rest of your income you can choose to take from either pre-tax or Roth, so you can optimize tax burden over a number of years. In particular, you can avoid paying in a high tax bracket simply because you had to withdraw a large amount in a single year to handle an emergency. Or taxes might be extraordinarily low for a short time, because a particular Congress added a new deduction that applies to you, and you don't expect it to survive the next election, you could choose to pay taxes in the favorable year by doing a (probably partial) conversion to Roth.



            Combining these two effects, the rule of thumb to max out the Roth IRA contribution each year after meeting the 401(k) match is probably the best approach for 90% of W2 employees. (The investment options are different for self-employed and contractors, as well as owners.)





            If you were to withdraw from the 401k at a rate that fell into the 24% tax bracket, then the accounts effectively have the same amount of money in them.




            That's false, because tax brackets apply sequentially.



            Notably, tax deductions for making traditional 401(k) contributions (and deductible traditional IRA contributions where applicable, but usually you can't) save you tax money at your marginal rate (or perhaps one bracket down). But when in retirement, some of that money will be withdrawn at the 0% (i.e. the standard or itemized deduction total), 10%, and 12% brackets, or whatever the lowest brackets are in the future. So, all other things being equal, taking the deduction now will tend to be better.






            share|improve this answer















            You assumed the same rate of growth in both accounts, which is likely wrong.



            A 401(k) doesn't give you many choices.



            If yours has low-cost index funds in all the major market areas (large-cap growth, large-cap value, mid-cap growth, mid-cap value, small-cap growth, small-cap value, government bonds, corporate bonds) then it can be a good option. But beware, your money is stuck there for the duration of your employment, and your company has no obligation to offer you the same funds at the same expense ratio next year as you have now.



            On the other hand, an IRA is yours to invest how you like, with any brokerage you like. So an IRA has all of the above choices available at expense ratios of 0.08% or less. As well as the possibility to invest in individual companies, or in market sector ETFs, or use leverage, or trade options.



            The difference in expense ratio between 0.80% and 0.08% may seem unimportant compared to the differences in tax brackets... but you'll pay the taxes once, and you'll pay the fund expenses every year for nearly 30 years.



            In addition, it is advisable to save part of your retirement in Traditional (pre-tax) accounts, and part in Roth accounts. For this part of the discussion, a Roth 401(k) can serve just as well as a Roth IRA. This is both to hedge your tax exposure (What if the government increases every tax bracket by 10%? What if they decide to break the promise that Roth earnings will never be taxed?), and also give you flexibility. Each year in retirement, you'll need to take the required minimum distribution from your pre-tax retirement savings, but the rest of your income you can choose to take from either pre-tax or Roth, so you can optimize tax burden over a number of years. In particular, you can avoid paying in a high tax bracket simply because you had to withdraw a large amount in a single year to handle an emergency. Or taxes might be extraordinarily low for a short time, because a particular Congress added a new deduction that applies to you, and you don't expect it to survive the next election, you could choose to pay taxes in the favorable year by doing a (probably partial) conversion to Roth.



            Combining these two effects, the rule of thumb to max out the Roth IRA contribution each year after meeting the 401(k) match is probably the best approach for 90% of W2 employees. (The investment options are different for self-employed and contractors, as well as owners.)





            If you were to withdraw from the 401k at a rate that fell into the 24% tax bracket, then the accounts effectively have the same amount of money in them.




            That's false, because tax brackets apply sequentially.



            Notably, tax deductions for making traditional 401(k) contributions (and deductible traditional IRA contributions where applicable, but usually you can't) save you tax money at your marginal rate (or perhaps one bracket down). But when in retirement, some of that money will be withdrawn at the 0% (i.e. the standard or itemized deduction total), 10%, and 12% brackets, or whatever the lowest brackets are in the future. So, all other things being equal, taking the deduction now will tend to be better.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 52 mins ago









            JoeTaxpayer

            148k23238478




            148k23238478










            answered 8 hours ago









            Ben VoigtBen Voigt

            3,58221520




            3,58221520












            • Ben - please note my minor edit. If unwelcome, you are free to rollback. Beautiful answer here.

              – JoeTaxpayer
              51 mins ago

















            • Ben - please note my minor edit. If unwelcome, you are free to rollback. Beautiful answer here.

              – JoeTaxpayer
              51 mins ago
















            Ben - please note my minor edit. If unwelcome, you are free to rollback. Beautiful answer here.

            – JoeTaxpayer
            51 mins ago





            Ben - please note my minor edit. If unwelcome, you are free to rollback. Beautiful answer here.

            – JoeTaxpayer
            51 mins ago













            2














            You misunderstood the advice from nerd wallet:




            1. Contribute enough to earn the full match.

            2. Next, contribute as much as you’re allowed to an IRA.

            3. After maxing out an IRA, revisit your 401(k).



            In each step you will have to decide if the money will be Traditional, Roth or a mixture of both.



            Before there was the option of a Roth 401(k), the Roth portion if there was a Roth portion always had to take place in step 2.



            The reason for step 1 is to get the "free money". If there is no company match then skip step 1.



            One reason for the IRA portion is to give you more choices. It is easier to find low cost Funds for IRA investments compared to the limited options in the 401(k).



            In reality you may end-up doing steps 1 and 3 each paycheck. At the start of the year you decide how much you want to contribute to your retirement accounts. Then you figure what percent of each paycheck that would represent. Some people start with I want to save X percent of my gross pay, so they use that to determine how much they are going to save.



            If the percentage of each paycheck is higher than the amount that is needed to trigger the maximum match, and for almost every 401(k) match I have seen your savings goal for the year will be higher than what will get you the maximum match; you will want to contribute to an IRA.



            Note that to get the maximum match you have to contribute the magic amount every paycheck. So it isn't quite true that you contribute till you reach the maximum match, then switch to the IRA, then switch back. You will be contributing every paycheck.



            Now after allocating funds for the IRA which doesn't have to be invested every paycheck, or even every month, if you wont reach your savings goal, then you will have to put more in the 401(k).



            Example 1:



            • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 10%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

            • So you will contribute 10,000 (10% of 100K)

            • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

            • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 230.77, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny)

            • So the remaining $4,000 is for the IRA, which doesn't hit the limit. So need for step 3.

            Example 2:



            • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 20%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

            • So you will contribute 20,000 (20% of 100K)

            • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

            • The remaining $14,000 won't fit in the 6,000 limit of an IRA. So step 3 is needed.

            • Assign $6,000 for the IRA.

            • That means that $8,000 is available for step 3, which is equal to 8% of gross, so tour total 401(k) contribution is now 14%

            • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 538.46, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny).

            You still have to decide Traditional or Roth.






            share|improve this answer



























              2














              You misunderstood the advice from nerd wallet:




              1. Contribute enough to earn the full match.

              2. Next, contribute as much as you’re allowed to an IRA.

              3. After maxing out an IRA, revisit your 401(k).



              In each step you will have to decide if the money will be Traditional, Roth or a mixture of both.



              Before there was the option of a Roth 401(k), the Roth portion if there was a Roth portion always had to take place in step 2.



              The reason for step 1 is to get the "free money". If there is no company match then skip step 1.



              One reason for the IRA portion is to give you more choices. It is easier to find low cost Funds for IRA investments compared to the limited options in the 401(k).



              In reality you may end-up doing steps 1 and 3 each paycheck. At the start of the year you decide how much you want to contribute to your retirement accounts. Then you figure what percent of each paycheck that would represent. Some people start with I want to save X percent of my gross pay, so they use that to determine how much they are going to save.



              If the percentage of each paycheck is higher than the amount that is needed to trigger the maximum match, and for almost every 401(k) match I have seen your savings goal for the year will be higher than what will get you the maximum match; you will want to contribute to an IRA.



              Note that to get the maximum match you have to contribute the magic amount every paycheck. So it isn't quite true that you contribute till you reach the maximum match, then switch to the IRA, then switch back. You will be contributing every paycheck.



              Now after allocating funds for the IRA which doesn't have to be invested every paycheck, or even every month, if you wont reach your savings goal, then you will have to put more in the 401(k).



              Example 1:



              • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 10%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

              • So you will contribute 10,000 (10% of 100K)

              • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

              • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 230.77, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny)

              • So the remaining $4,000 is for the IRA, which doesn't hit the limit. So need for step 3.

              Example 2:



              • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 20%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

              • So you will contribute 20,000 (20% of 100K)

              • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

              • The remaining $14,000 won't fit in the 6,000 limit of an IRA. So step 3 is needed.

              • Assign $6,000 for the IRA.

              • That means that $8,000 is available for step 3, which is equal to 8% of gross, so tour total 401(k) contribution is now 14%

              • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 538.46, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny).

              You still have to decide Traditional or Roth.






              share|improve this answer

























                2












                2








                2







                You misunderstood the advice from nerd wallet:




                1. Contribute enough to earn the full match.

                2. Next, contribute as much as you’re allowed to an IRA.

                3. After maxing out an IRA, revisit your 401(k).



                In each step you will have to decide if the money will be Traditional, Roth or a mixture of both.



                Before there was the option of a Roth 401(k), the Roth portion if there was a Roth portion always had to take place in step 2.



                The reason for step 1 is to get the "free money". If there is no company match then skip step 1.



                One reason for the IRA portion is to give you more choices. It is easier to find low cost Funds for IRA investments compared to the limited options in the 401(k).



                In reality you may end-up doing steps 1 and 3 each paycheck. At the start of the year you decide how much you want to contribute to your retirement accounts. Then you figure what percent of each paycheck that would represent. Some people start with I want to save X percent of my gross pay, so they use that to determine how much they are going to save.



                If the percentage of each paycheck is higher than the amount that is needed to trigger the maximum match, and for almost every 401(k) match I have seen your savings goal for the year will be higher than what will get you the maximum match; you will want to contribute to an IRA.



                Note that to get the maximum match you have to contribute the magic amount every paycheck. So it isn't quite true that you contribute till you reach the maximum match, then switch to the IRA, then switch back. You will be contributing every paycheck.



                Now after allocating funds for the IRA which doesn't have to be invested every paycheck, or even every month, if you wont reach your savings goal, then you will have to put more in the 401(k).



                Example 1:



                • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 10%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

                • So you will contribute 10,000 (10% of 100K)

                • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

                • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 230.77, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny)

                • So the remaining $4,000 is for the IRA, which doesn't hit the limit. So need for step 3.

                Example 2:



                • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 20%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

                • So you will contribute 20,000 (20% of 100K)

                • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

                • The remaining $14,000 won't fit in the 6,000 limit of an IRA. So step 3 is needed.

                • Assign $6,000 for the IRA.

                • That means that $8,000 is available for step 3, which is equal to 8% of gross, so tour total 401(k) contribution is now 14%

                • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 538.46, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny).

                You still have to decide Traditional or Roth.






                share|improve this answer













                You misunderstood the advice from nerd wallet:




                1. Contribute enough to earn the full match.

                2. Next, contribute as much as you’re allowed to an IRA.

                3. After maxing out an IRA, revisit your 401(k).



                In each step you will have to decide if the money will be Traditional, Roth or a mixture of both.



                Before there was the option of a Roth 401(k), the Roth portion if there was a Roth portion always had to take place in step 2.



                The reason for step 1 is to get the "free money". If there is no company match then skip step 1.



                One reason for the IRA portion is to give you more choices. It is easier to find low cost Funds for IRA investments compared to the limited options in the 401(k).



                In reality you may end-up doing steps 1 and 3 each paycheck. At the start of the year you decide how much you want to contribute to your retirement accounts. Then you figure what percent of each paycheck that would represent. Some people start with I want to save X percent of my gross pay, so they use that to determine how much they are going to save.



                If the percentage of each paycheck is higher than the amount that is needed to trigger the maximum match, and for almost every 401(k) match I have seen your savings goal for the year will be higher than what will get you the maximum match; you will want to contribute to an IRA.



                Note that to get the maximum match you have to contribute the magic amount every paycheck. So it isn't quite true that you contribute till you reach the maximum match, then switch to the IRA, then switch back. You will be contributing every paycheck.



                Now after allocating funds for the IRA which doesn't have to be invested every paycheck, or even every month, if you wont reach your savings goal, then you will have to put more in the 401(k).



                Example 1:



                • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 10%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

                • So you will contribute 10,000 (10% of 100K)

                • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

                • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 230.77, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny)

                • So the remaining $4,000 is for the IRA, which doesn't hit the limit. So need for step 3.

                Example 2:



                • Income 100K, under age 50, retirement savings goal 20%, company match 6% will get you 3%, 26 paychecks.

                • So you will contribute 20,000 (20% of 100K)

                • 6% of 100K or $6,000 will go into the 401(k) in step 1. The company will match with $3K.

                • The remaining $14,000 won't fit in the 6,000 limit of an IRA. So step 3 is needed.

                • Assign $6,000 for the IRA.

                • That means that $8,000 is available for step 3, which is equal to 8% of gross, so tour total 401(k) contribution is now 14%

                • The paycheck is gross: $3846.15; 401K is 538.46, company match 115.38 (give or take a penny).

                You still have to decide Traditional or Roth.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep

                70.4k898176




                70.4k898176



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108286%2fwhy-do-401k-up-to-company-match-then-fill-roth-ira-then-finish-filling-401k%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can not update quote_id field of “quote_item” table magento 2Magento 2.1 - We can't remove the item. (Shopping Cart doesnt allow us to remove items before becomes empty)Add value for custom quote item attribute using REST apiREST API endpoint v1/carts/cartId/items always returns error messageCorrect way to save entries to databaseHow to remove all associated quote objects of a customer completelyMagento 2 - Save value from custom input field to quote_itemGet quote_item data using quote id and product id filter in Magento 2How to set additional data to quote_item table from controller in Magento 2?What is the purpose of additional_data column in quote_item table in magento2Set Custom Price to Quote item magento2 from controller

                    How to solve knockout JS error in Magento 2 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?(Magento2) knockout.js:3012 Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process bindingUnable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Cannot read property `scopeLabel` of undefined on Product Detail PageCan't get Customer Data on frontend in Magento 2Magento2 Order Summary - unable to process bindingKO templates are not loading in Magento 2.1 applicationgetting knockout js error magento 2Product grid not load -— Unable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Product form not loaded in magento2Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process binding “if: function()return (isShowLegend()) ” magento 2

                    Nissan Patrol Зміст Перше покоління — 4W60 (1951-1960) | Друге покоління — 60 series (1960-1980) | Третє покоління (1980–2002) | Четверте покоління — Y60 (1987–1998) | П'яте покоління — Y61 (1997–2013) | Шосте покоління — Y62 (2010- ) | Посилання | Зноски | Навігаційне менюОфіційний український сайтТест-драйв Nissan Patrol 2010 7-го поколінняNissan PatrolКак мы тестировали Nissan Patrol 2016рвиправивши або дописавши її