Font Color issue in Mathematica 12Mathematica color schemes for the colorblindFont sizes in graphicsChange Default Font Color of CommandsHow to change the font color and size of tick labels by defaultLine graphics opaqueness issueColor Space issue with GraphicsGraphics Alignment IssueIssue with FrameTick marks in Mathematica 11.3Mathematica 12, supported GPUsMathematica 12.0.0 crashes on second 'Quit[]'

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?

Was it really necessary for the Lunar module LM to have 2 stages?

Alternatives to Overleaf

Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?

What does KSP mean?

Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?

Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?

Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics

How to back up a running remote server?

Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears?

Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?

With a Canadian student visa, can I spend a night at Vancouver before continuing to Toronto?

Stateful vs non-stateful app

Why the difference in metal between 銀行 and お金?

French for 'It must be my imagination'?

Is there any limitation with Arduino Nano serial communication distance?

How to figure out whether the data is sample data or population data apart from the client's information?

Providence Pentominoes Puzzle By Andrew Bradburn (Jigsaw)

Error message with tabularx

Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"

Sci-fi novel series with instant travel between planets through gates. A river runs through the gates

Fizzy, soft, pop and still drinks

Is DC-to-DC (24 V to 12 V) buck conversion typically more efficient than AC-to-DC (110 V to 12 V) conversion?



Font Color issue in Mathematica 12


Mathematica color schemes for the colorblindFont sizes in graphicsChange Default Font Color of CommandsHow to change the font color and size of tick labels by defaultLine graphics opaqueness issueColor Space issue with GraphicsGraphics Alignment IssueIssue with FrameTick marks in Mathematica 11.3Mathematica 12, supported GPUsMathematica 12.0.0 crashes on second 'Quit[]'













1












$begingroup$


TD = 8 + 12 + 12 + 12 + 33 + (61 + 1/4) + (41 + 1/4)/2 + 
15/2 + (18 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4)/2 + 14/2;
CM = 15/2 + (61 + 1/4) + (41 + 1/4)/2 +
24 + (3 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4)/2 + 14/2 + (24 + 3/4) +
9/2;
TP = 2*90;

countsDim1 = CM, TD, TP/(TD + TP + CM)

n = 384 + 179;
labels = Placed[
Row /@ Thread["" <> ToString@# <>
" H" & /@ N[(n countsDim1[[1]]), 5],
N[(n countsDim1[[2]]), 5], Round@N[(n countsDim1)[[3]]]],
"RadialOuter"];
legend = Placed[
SwatchLegend[Automatic,
Row /@ Thread["CM ", "TD ", "TP ",
Row["(", #, , ")"] & /@
Quantity[Round[100 countsDim1], "Percent"]],
LabelStyle -> FontSize -> 26, FontFamily -> "Latin Modern Roman",
FontColor -> Black, FontWeight -> Bold,
LegendMarkerSize -> 26], After, Bottom, Framed];

type = Framed[
PieChart[countsDim1, ChartLabels -> labels, ChartLegends -> legend,
PlotRange -> All,
LabelStyle -> FontSize -> 26, FontFamily -> "Latin Modern Roman",
FontColor -> White, FontWeight -> Bold, PlotTheme -> "Business",
ImageSize -> Medium], Background -> LightGreen]


In Mathematica 11.3 above code would produce a Pie Chart with the percentage of the Legend black. In Mathematica 12, I get the text of the percentage with gray color.



Version 12



Below the same figure with Mathematica 11.3 (albeit without the bold text of the LegendLabel)



Version 11.3



What is different in Mathematica 12?



How can I get the percentage in black color (and bold)?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    TD = 8 + 12 + 12 + 12 + 33 + (61 + 1/4) + (41 + 1/4)/2 + 
    15/2 + (18 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4)/2 + 14/2;
    CM = 15/2 + (61 + 1/4) + (41 + 1/4)/2 +
    24 + (3 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4)/2 + 14/2 + (24 + 3/4) +
    9/2;
    TP = 2*90;

    countsDim1 = CM, TD, TP/(TD + TP + CM)

    n = 384 + 179;
    labels = Placed[
    Row /@ Thread["" <> ToString@# <>
    " H" & /@ N[(n countsDim1[[1]]), 5],
    N[(n countsDim1[[2]]), 5], Round@N[(n countsDim1)[[3]]]],
    "RadialOuter"];
    legend = Placed[
    SwatchLegend[Automatic,
    Row /@ Thread["CM ", "TD ", "TP ",
    Row["(", #, , ")"] & /@
    Quantity[Round[100 countsDim1], "Percent"]],
    LabelStyle -> FontSize -> 26, FontFamily -> "Latin Modern Roman",
    FontColor -> Black, FontWeight -> Bold,
    LegendMarkerSize -> 26], After, Bottom, Framed];

    type = Framed[
    PieChart[countsDim1, ChartLabels -> labels, ChartLegends -> legend,
    PlotRange -> All,
    LabelStyle -> FontSize -> 26, FontFamily -> "Latin Modern Roman",
    FontColor -> White, FontWeight -> Bold, PlotTheme -> "Business",
    ImageSize -> Medium], Background -> LightGreen]


    In Mathematica 11.3 above code would produce a Pie Chart with the percentage of the Legend black. In Mathematica 12, I get the text of the percentage with gray color.



    Version 12



    Below the same figure with Mathematica 11.3 (albeit without the bold text of the LegendLabel)



    Version 11.3



    What is different in Mathematica 12?



    How can I get the percentage in black color (and bold)?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      TD = 8 + 12 + 12 + 12 + 33 + (61 + 1/4) + (41 + 1/4)/2 + 
      15/2 + (18 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4)/2 + 14/2;
      CM = 15/2 + (61 + 1/4) + (41 + 1/4)/2 +
      24 + (3 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4)/2 + 14/2 + (24 + 3/4) +
      9/2;
      TP = 2*90;

      countsDim1 = CM, TD, TP/(TD + TP + CM)

      n = 384 + 179;
      labels = Placed[
      Row /@ Thread["" <> ToString@# <>
      " H" & /@ N[(n countsDim1[[1]]), 5],
      N[(n countsDim1[[2]]), 5], Round@N[(n countsDim1)[[3]]]],
      "RadialOuter"];
      legend = Placed[
      SwatchLegend[Automatic,
      Row /@ Thread["CM ", "TD ", "TP ",
      Row["(", #, , ")"] & /@
      Quantity[Round[100 countsDim1], "Percent"]],
      LabelStyle -> FontSize -> 26, FontFamily -> "Latin Modern Roman",
      FontColor -> Black, FontWeight -> Bold,
      LegendMarkerSize -> 26], After, Bottom, Framed];

      type = Framed[
      PieChart[countsDim1, ChartLabels -> labels, ChartLegends -> legend,
      PlotRange -> All,
      LabelStyle -> FontSize -> 26, FontFamily -> "Latin Modern Roman",
      FontColor -> White, FontWeight -> Bold, PlotTheme -> "Business",
      ImageSize -> Medium], Background -> LightGreen]


      In Mathematica 11.3 above code would produce a Pie Chart with the percentage of the Legend black. In Mathematica 12, I get the text of the percentage with gray color.



      Version 12



      Below the same figure with Mathematica 11.3 (albeit without the bold text of the LegendLabel)



      Version 11.3



      What is different in Mathematica 12?



      How can I get the percentage in black color (and bold)?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      TD = 8 + 12 + 12 + 12 + 33 + (61 + 1/4) + (41 + 1/4)/2 + 
      15/2 + (18 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4)/2 + 14/2;
      CM = 15/2 + (61 + 1/4) + (41 + 1/4)/2 +
      24 + (3 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4) + (18 + 3/4)/2 + 14/2 + (24 + 3/4) +
      9/2;
      TP = 2*90;

      countsDim1 = CM, TD, TP/(TD + TP + CM)

      n = 384 + 179;
      labels = Placed[
      Row /@ Thread["" <> ToString@# <>
      " H" & /@ N[(n countsDim1[[1]]), 5],
      N[(n countsDim1[[2]]), 5], Round@N[(n countsDim1)[[3]]]],
      "RadialOuter"];
      legend = Placed[
      SwatchLegend[Automatic,
      Row /@ Thread["CM ", "TD ", "TP ",
      Row["(", #, , ")"] & /@
      Quantity[Round[100 countsDim1], "Percent"]],
      LabelStyle -> FontSize -> 26, FontFamily -> "Latin Modern Roman",
      FontColor -> Black, FontWeight -> Bold,
      LegendMarkerSize -> 26], After, Bottom, Framed];

      type = Framed[
      PieChart[countsDim1, ChartLabels -> labels, ChartLegends -> legend,
      PlotRange -> All,
      LabelStyle -> FontSize -> 26, FontFamily -> "Latin Modern Roman",
      FontColor -> White, FontWeight -> Bold, PlotTheme -> "Business",
      ImageSize -> Medium], Background -> LightGreen]


      In Mathematica 11.3 above code would produce a Pie Chart with the percentage of the Legend black. In Mathematica 12, I get the text of the percentage with gray color.



      Version 12



      Below the same figure with Mathematica 11.3 (albeit without the bold text of the LegendLabel)



      Version 11.3



      What is different in Mathematica 12?



      How can I get the percentage in black color (and bold)?







      graphics version-12






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago







      Dimitris

















      asked 4 hours ago









      DimitrisDimitris

      2,3621332




      2,3621332




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I don't know why it was visualized like that in Mathematica 11.3, but generally speaking, styling can be affected when you plot objects like entities, quantities, etc. instead of their corresponding strings. To be fully in control of the styling, I would suggest converting the quantity to a number.



          I suggest replacing



          Row["(", #, , ")"]


          with



          Row["(", QuantityMagnitude[#], "%)"]





          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            Looks like a bug to me:



            In version 12.0, the typesetting of Quantity objects in TraditionalForm (which is used for legends in Legended expressions) breaks after typesetting a quantity with the same unit in StandardForm. To see this, consider the following example: (use a fresh kernel)



            TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
            Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
            TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
            TraditionalForm@Quantity[1, "Percent"]


            enter image description here



            As you can see, quantities are typeset differently in TraditionalForm, and the one for TraditionalForm changes after typesetting in StandardForm once. The case of 1 is handled differently for some reason and does not break.



            In 11.3, the typesetting of the TraditionalForm variant does not break after typesetting the StandardForm variant. This is why your example works in 11.3: The style for TraditionalForm does not set the FontColor, while the StandardForm one does (see CurrentValue[StyleDefinitions, "QuantityPanel"], which is only used for StandardForm). That this works seems like a lucky coincidence, so I would suggest to use the method from @C.E.'s answer anyway, even if this gets fixed.



            Tracking down the issue



            The issue is caused by a change to the caching used for quantity typesetting:



            (* cache lookup in 11.3 typesetting code for Quantity *)
            QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
            Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form:StandardForm]
            ] :=
            Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]

            (* cache lookup in 12.0 typesetting code for Quantity *)
            QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
            Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form_:StandardForm]
            ] :=
            Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]


            Note the change from form:StandardForm to form_:StandardForm - this extends the caching from StandardForm to all forms. The reason I think this is a bug is that this is the only definition of QuantityBox that defaults form to anything (all the others require an explicit form to be given), which suggests someone "fixed" a typo.



            The issue with the caching code is that it ignores form when performing the cache lookup. Writing to the cache still requires StandardForm (here, the form:StandardForm pattern is still present in 12.0). The code was already questionable in 11.3 (since the caching partially supports forms other than StandardForm), but this was not an issue since it was only ever called with StandardForm.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "387"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197228%2ffont-color-issue-in-mathematica-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              I don't know why it was visualized like that in Mathematica 11.3, but generally speaking, styling can be affected when you plot objects like entities, quantities, etc. instead of their corresponding strings. To be fully in control of the styling, I would suggest converting the quantity to a number.



              I suggest replacing



              Row["(", #, , ")"]


              with



              Row["(", QuantityMagnitude[#], "%)"]





              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                I don't know why it was visualized like that in Mathematica 11.3, but generally speaking, styling can be affected when you plot objects like entities, quantities, etc. instead of their corresponding strings. To be fully in control of the styling, I would suggest converting the quantity to a number.



                I suggest replacing



                Row["(", #, , ")"]


                with



                Row["(", QuantityMagnitude[#], "%)"]





                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  I don't know why it was visualized like that in Mathematica 11.3, but generally speaking, styling can be affected when you plot objects like entities, quantities, etc. instead of their corresponding strings. To be fully in control of the styling, I would suggest converting the quantity to a number.



                  I suggest replacing



                  Row["(", #, , ")"]


                  with



                  Row["(", QuantityMagnitude[#], "%)"]





                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I don't know why it was visualized like that in Mathematica 11.3, but generally speaking, styling can be affected when you plot objects like entities, quantities, etc. instead of their corresponding strings. To be fully in control of the styling, I would suggest converting the quantity to a number.



                  I suggest replacing



                  Row["(", #, , ")"]


                  with



                  Row["(", QuantityMagnitude[#], "%)"]






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  C. E.C. E.

                  51.5k3101207




                  51.5k3101207





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Looks like a bug to me:



                      In version 12.0, the typesetting of Quantity objects in TraditionalForm (which is used for legends in Legended expressions) breaks after typesetting a quantity with the same unit in StandardForm. To see this, consider the following example: (use a fresh kernel)



                      TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                      Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                      TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                      TraditionalForm@Quantity[1, "Percent"]


                      enter image description here



                      As you can see, quantities are typeset differently in TraditionalForm, and the one for TraditionalForm changes after typesetting in StandardForm once. The case of 1 is handled differently for some reason and does not break.



                      In 11.3, the typesetting of the TraditionalForm variant does not break after typesetting the StandardForm variant. This is why your example works in 11.3: The style for TraditionalForm does not set the FontColor, while the StandardForm one does (see CurrentValue[StyleDefinitions, "QuantityPanel"], which is only used for StandardForm). That this works seems like a lucky coincidence, so I would suggest to use the method from @C.E.'s answer anyway, even if this gets fixed.



                      Tracking down the issue



                      The issue is caused by a change to the caching used for quantity typesetting:



                      (* cache lookup in 11.3 typesetting code for Quantity *)
                      QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
                      Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form:StandardForm]
                      ] :=
                      Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]

                      (* cache lookup in 12.0 typesetting code for Quantity *)
                      QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
                      Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form_:StandardForm]
                      ] :=
                      Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]


                      Note the change from form:StandardForm to form_:StandardForm - this extends the caching from StandardForm to all forms. The reason I think this is a bug is that this is the only definition of QuantityBox that defaults form to anything (all the others require an explicit form to be given), which suggests someone "fixed" a typo.



                      The issue with the caching code is that it ignores form when performing the cache lookup. Writing to the cache still requires StandardForm (here, the form:StandardForm pattern is still present in 12.0). The code was already questionable in 11.3 (since the caching partially supports forms other than StandardForm), but this was not an issue since it was only ever called with StandardForm.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Looks like a bug to me:



                        In version 12.0, the typesetting of Quantity objects in TraditionalForm (which is used for legends in Legended expressions) breaks after typesetting a quantity with the same unit in StandardForm. To see this, consider the following example: (use a fresh kernel)



                        TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                        Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                        TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                        TraditionalForm@Quantity[1, "Percent"]


                        enter image description here



                        As you can see, quantities are typeset differently in TraditionalForm, and the one for TraditionalForm changes after typesetting in StandardForm once. The case of 1 is handled differently for some reason and does not break.



                        In 11.3, the typesetting of the TraditionalForm variant does not break after typesetting the StandardForm variant. This is why your example works in 11.3: The style for TraditionalForm does not set the FontColor, while the StandardForm one does (see CurrentValue[StyleDefinitions, "QuantityPanel"], which is only used for StandardForm). That this works seems like a lucky coincidence, so I would suggest to use the method from @C.E.'s answer anyway, even if this gets fixed.



                        Tracking down the issue



                        The issue is caused by a change to the caching used for quantity typesetting:



                        (* cache lookup in 11.3 typesetting code for Quantity *)
                        QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
                        Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form:StandardForm]
                        ] :=
                        Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]

                        (* cache lookup in 12.0 typesetting code for Quantity *)
                        QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
                        Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form_:StandardForm]
                        ] :=
                        Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]


                        Note the change from form:StandardForm to form_:StandardForm - this extends the caching from StandardForm to all forms. The reason I think this is a bug is that this is the only definition of QuantityBox that defaults form to anything (all the others require an explicit form to be given), which suggests someone "fixed" a typo.



                        The issue with the caching code is that it ignores form when performing the cache lookup. Writing to the cache still requires StandardForm (here, the form:StandardForm pattern is still present in 12.0). The code was already questionable in 11.3 (since the caching partially supports forms other than StandardForm), but this was not an issue since it was only ever called with StandardForm.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          Looks like a bug to me:



                          In version 12.0, the typesetting of Quantity objects in TraditionalForm (which is used for legends in Legended expressions) breaks after typesetting a quantity with the same unit in StandardForm. To see this, consider the following example: (use a fresh kernel)



                          TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                          Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                          TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                          TraditionalForm@Quantity[1, "Percent"]


                          enter image description here



                          As you can see, quantities are typeset differently in TraditionalForm, and the one for TraditionalForm changes after typesetting in StandardForm once. The case of 1 is handled differently for some reason and does not break.



                          In 11.3, the typesetting of the TraditionalForm variant does not break after typesetting the StandardForm variant. This is why your example works in 11.3: The style for TraditionalForm does not set the FontColor, while the StandardForm one does (see CurrentValue[StyleDefinitions, "QuantityPanel"], which is only used for StandardForm). That this works seems like a lucky coincidence, so I would suggest to use the method from @C.E.'s answer anyway, even if this gets fixed.



                          Tracking down the issue



                          The issue is caused by a change to the caching used for quantity typesetting:



                          (* cache lookup in 11.3 typesetting code for Quantity *)
                          QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
                          Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form:StandardForm]
                          ] :=
                          Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]

                          (* cache lookup in 12.0 typesetting code for Quantity *)
                          QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
                          Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form_:StandardForm]
                          ] :=
                          Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]


                          Note the change from form:StandardForm to form_:StandardForm - this extends the caching from StandardForm to all forms. The reason I think this is a bug is that this is the only definition of QuantityBox that defaults form to anything (all the others require an explicit form to be given), which suggests someone "fixed" a typo.



                          The issue with the caching code is that it ignores form when performing the cache lookup. Writing to the cache still requires StandardForm (here, the form:StandardForm pattern is still present in 12.0). The code was already questionable in 11.3 (since the caching partially supports forms other than StandardForm), but this was not an issue since it was only ever called with StandardForm.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Looks like a bug to me:



                          In version 12.0, the typesetting of Quantity objects in TraditionalForm (which is used for legends in Legended expressions) breaks after typesetting a quantity with the same unit in StandardForm. To see this, consider the following example: (use a fresh kernel)



                          TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                          Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                          TraditionalForm@Quantity[3.5, "Percent"]
                          TraditionalForm@Quantity[1, "Percent"]


                          enter image description here



                          As you can see, quantities are typeset differently in TraditionalForm, and the one for TraditionalForm changes after typesetting in StandardForm once. The case of 1 is handled differently for some reason and does not break.



                          In 11.3, the typesetting of the TraditionalForm variant does not break after typesetting the StandardForm variant. This is why your example works in 11.3: The style for TraditionalForm does not set the FontColor, while the StandardForm one does (see CurrentValue[StyleDefinitions, "QuantityPanel"], which is only used for StandardForm). That this works seems like a lucky coincidence, so I would suggest to use the method from @C.E.'s answer anyway, even if this gets fixed.



                          Tracking down the issue



                          The issue is caused by a change to the caching used for quantity typesetting:



                          (* cache lookup in 11.3 typesetting code for Quantity *)
                          QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
                          Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form:StandardForm]
                          ] :=
                          Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]

                          (* cache lookup in 12.0 typesetting code for Quantity *)
                          QuantityUnits`QuantityBox[
                          Quantity[n_, unit_?QuantityUnits`Private`UnitDisplayCacheContainsQ], form_:StandardForm]
                          ] :=
                          Quiet[QuantityUnits`Private`getUnitDisplayForm[unit, n, form], Part::partw]


                          Note the change from form:StandardForm to form_:StandardForm - this extends the caching from StandardForm to all forms. The reason I think this is a bug is that this is the only definition of QuantityBox that defaults form to anything (all the others require an explicit form to be given), which suggests someone "fixed" a typo.



                          The issue with the caching code is that it ignores form when performing the cache lookup. Writing to the cache still requires StandardForm (here, the form:StandardForm pattern is still present in 12.0). The code was already questionable in 11.3 (since the caching partially supports forms other than StandardForm), but this was not an issue since it was only ever called with StandardForm.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 26 mins ago









                          Lukas LangLukas Lang

                          7,48011032




                          7,48011032



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197228%2ffont-color-issue-in-mathematica-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can not update quote_id field of “quote_item” table magento 2Magento 2.1 - We can't remove the item. (Shopping Cart doesnt allow us to remove items before becomes empty)Add value for custom quote item attribute using REST apiREST API endpoint v1/carts/cartId/items always returns error messageCorrect way to save entries to databaseHow to remove all associated quote objects of a customer completelyMagento 2 - Save value from custom input field to quote_itemGet quote_item data using quote id and product id filter in Magento 2How to set additional data to quote_item table from controller in Magento 2?What is the purpose of additional_data column in quote_item table in magento2Set Custom Price to Quote item magento2 from controller

                              How to solve knockout JS error in Magento 2 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?(Magento2) knockout.js:3012 Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process bindingUnable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Cannot read property `scopeLabel` of undefined on Product Detail PageCan't get Customer Data on frontend in Magento 2Magento2 Order Summary - unable to process bindingKO templates are not loading in Magento 2.1 applicationgetting knockout js error magento 2Product grid not load -— Unable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Product form not loaded in magento2Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process binding “if: function()return (isShowLegend()) ” magento 2

                              Nissan Patrol Зміст Перше покоління — 4W60 (1951-1960) | Друге покоління — 60 series (1960-1980) | Третє покоління (1980–2002) | Четверте покоління — Y60 (1987–1998) | П'яте покоління — Y61 (1997–2013) | Шосте покоління — Y62 (2010- ) | Посилання | Зноски | Навігаційне менюОфіційний український сайтТест-драйв Nissan Patrol 2010 7-го поколінняNissan PatrolКак мы тестировали Nissan Patrol 2016рвиправивши або дописавши її