Python: pythonic way to find last position in string that does not match regexIs there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonNicest way to pad zeroes to a stringDoes Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to substring a string in Python?Getting the last element of a list in PythonReverse a string in PythonDoes Python have a string 'contains' substring method?How do I lowercase a string in Python?Most elegant way to check if the string is empty in Python?
"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context
Unexpected email from Yorkshire Bank
Can solid acids and bases have pH values? If not, how are they classified as acids or bases?
Finding an element in array, whose index number and element value same
Trainer for recumbent bikes
French for 'It must be my imagination'?
A Note on N!
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish
Why do 401k up to company match, then fill Roth IRA, then finish filling 401k?
What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `ab,cd` (braces)?
Is there any limitation with Arduino Nano serial communication distance?
How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?
Inner for loop when run in background in bash spawns new bash process
Will a top journal at least read my introduction?
Is it possible to measure lightning discharges as Nikola Tesla?
Minimum value of 4 digit number divided by sum of its digits
Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
how to interpret this t result?
Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?
Python: pythonic way to find last position in string that does not match regex
Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonNicest way to pad zeroes to a stringDoes Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to substring a string in Python?Getting the last element of a list in PythonReverse a string in PythonDoes Python have a string 'contains' substring method?How do I lowercase a string in Python?Most elegant way to check if the string is empty in Python?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200
, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]
), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?
As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search()
in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search()
- but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:
import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()
I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string
before using it with [::-1]
, and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string)
because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search()
.
I am aware of re.search(...).end()
over .start()
, but re.search()
seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start()
, .end()
, etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end()
from this group.
What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
Update
The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123
(no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search()
or re.finditer()
before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.
python regex string regex-negation
add a comment |
In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200
, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]
), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?
As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search()
in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search()
- but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:
import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()
I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string
before using it with [::-1]
, and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string)
because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search()
.
I am aware of re.search(...).end()
over .start()
, but re.search()
seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start()
, .end()
, etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end()
from this group.
What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
Update
The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123
(no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search()
or re.finditer()
before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.
python regex string regex-negation
last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Laste
matches[^0-9]
pattern.
– dgumo
2 hours ago
Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be[^0-9]
. I'll update the question.
– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
Shoulds = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa'
return the index of last char before a digit akae
(8) or the last char akaa
(19)?
– ruohola
2 hours ago
1
Withuiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa
it should return the last position in the string, means19
.
– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
add a comment |
In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200
, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]
), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?
As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search()
in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search()
- but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:
import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()
I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string
before using it with [::-1]
, and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string)
because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search()
.
I am aware of re.search(...).end()
over .start()
, but re.search()
seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start()
, .end()
, etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end()
from this group.
What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
Update
The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123
(no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search()
or re.finditer()
before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.
python regex string regex-negation
In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200
, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]
), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?
As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search()
in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search()
- but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:
import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()
I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string
before using it with [::-1]
, and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string)
because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search()
.
I am aware of re.search(...).end()
over .start()
, but re.search()
seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start()
, .end()
, etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end()
from this group.
What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
Update
The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123
(no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search()
or re.finditer()
before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.
python regex string regex-negation
python regex string regex-negation
edited 1 hour ago
geekoverdose
asked 2 hours ago
geekoverdosegeekoverdose
727615
727615
last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Laste
matches[^0-9]
pattern.
– dgumo
2 hours ago
Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be[^0-9]
. I'll update the question.
– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
Shoulds = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa'
return the index of last char before a digit akae
(8) or the last char akaa
(19)?
– ruohola
2 hours ago
1
Withuiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa
it should return the last position in the string, means19
.
– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
add a comment |
last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Laste
matches[^0-9]
pattern.
– dgumo
2 hours ago
Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be[^0-9]
. I'll update the question.
– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
Shoulds = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa'
return the index of last char before a digit akae
(8) or the last char akaa
(19)?
– ruohola
2 hours ago
1
Withuiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa
it should return the last position in the string, means19
.
– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last
e
matches [^0-9]
pattern.– dgumo
2 hours ago
last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last
e
matches [^0-9]
pattern.– dgumo
2 hours ago
Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be
[^0-9]
. I'll update the question.– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be
[^0-9]
. I'll update the question.– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
Should
s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa'
return the index of last char before a digit aka e
(8) or the last char aka a
(19)?– ruohola
2 hours ago
Should
s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa'
return the index of last char before a digit aka e
(8) or the last char aka a
(19)?– ruohola
2 hours ago
1
1
With
uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa
it should return the last position in the string, means 19
.– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
With
uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa
it should return the last position in the string, means 19
.– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:
(printing None
with no errors when string = '123'
)
import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)
Output:
8
Or alternatively using collections.deque
:
import re
from collections import deque
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)
Output:
8
1
This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a[-1]
index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
@Rightleg True, but OP saidI would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
, so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.
– ruohola
48 mins ago
@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)
– ruohola
48 mins ago
add a comment |
You can use re.finditer
to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),
import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])
Prints,
8
1
Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.
– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
1 hour ago
1
Upside: one-liner possible (move the[-1]
one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
This will throw anIndexError
on the new requirement casestring = '123'
.
– ruohola
20 mins ago
add a comment |
This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo))
, but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.
def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i
The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string
from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern
.
Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.
2
This is just not pythonic at all.
– ruohola
2 hours ago
I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
This is not very readable, uses therange(len(foo))
antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
1
I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.
– Julian Camilleri
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55890245%2fpython-pythonic-way-to-find-last-position-in-string-that-does-not-match-regex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:
(printing None
with no errors when string = '123'
)
import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)
Output:
8
Or alternatively using collections.deque
:
import re
from collections import deque
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)
Output:
8
1
This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a[-1]
index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
@Rightleg True, but OP saidI would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
, so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.
– ruohola
48 mins ago
@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)
– ruohola
48 mins ago
add a comment |
This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:
(printing None
with no errors when string = '123'
)
import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)
Output:
8
Or alternatively using collections.deque
:
import re
from collections import deque
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)
Output:
8
1
This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a[-1]
index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
@Rightleg True, but OP saidI would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
, so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.
– ruohola
48 mins ago
@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)
– ruohola
48 mins ago
add a comment |
This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:
(printing None
with no errors when string = '123'
)
import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)
Output:
8
Or alternatively using collections.deque
:
import re
from collections import deque
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)
Output:
8
This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:
(printing None
with no errors when string = '123'
)
import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)
Output:
8
Or alternatively using collections.deque
:
import re
from collections import deque
string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)
Output:
8
edited 18 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
ruoholaruohola
2,129424
2,129424
1
This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a[-1]
index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
@Rightleg True, but OP saidI would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
, so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.
– ruohola
48 mins ago
@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)
– ruohola
48 mins ago
add a comment |
1
This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a[-1]
index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
@Rightleg True, but OP saidI would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
, so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.
– ruohola
48 mins ago
@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)
– ruohola
48 mins ago
1
1
This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a
[-1]
index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a
[-1]
index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner
– Right leg
1 hour ago
The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
1
@Rightleg True, but OP said
I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
, so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.– ruohola
48 mins ago
@Rightleg True, but OP said
I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.
, so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.– ruohola
48 mins ago
@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)
– ruohola
48 mins ago
@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)
– ruohola
48 mins ago
add a comment |
You can use re.finditer
to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),
import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])
Prints,
8
1
Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.
– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
1 hour ago
1
Upside: one-liner possible (move the[-1]
one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
This will throw anIndexError
on the new requirement casestring = '123'
.
– ruohola
20 mins ago
add a comment |
You can use re.finditer
to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),
import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])
Prints,
8
1
Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.
– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
1 hour ago
1
Upside: one-liner possible (move the[-1]
one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
This will throw anIndexError
on the new requirement casestring = '123'
.
– ruohola
20 mins ago
add a comment |
You can use re.finditer
to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),
import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])
Prints,
8
You can use re.finditer
to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),
import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])
Prints,
8
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Pushpesh Kumar RajwanshiPushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
13.7k21331
13.7k21331
1
Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.
– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
1 hour ago
1
Upside: one-liner possible (move the[-1]
one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
This will throw anIndexError
on the new requirement casestring = '123'
.
– ruohola
20 mins ago
add a comment |
1
Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.
– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
1 hour ago
1
Upside: one-liner possible (move the[-1]
one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
This will throw anIndexError
on the new requirement casestring = '123'
.
– ruohola
20 mins ago
1
1
Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.
– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
1 hour ago
@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.
– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
1 hour ago
1
1
Upside: one-liner possible (move the
[-1]
one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
Upside: one-liner possible (move the
[-1]
one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
This will throw an
IndexError
on the new requirement case string = '123'
.– ruohola
20 mins ago
This will throw an
IndexError
on the new requirement case string = '123'
.– ruohola
20 mins ago
add a comment |
This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo))
, but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.
def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i
The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string
from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern
.
Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.
2
This is just not pythonic at all.
– ruohola
2 hours ago
I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
This is not very readable, uses therange(len(foo))
antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
1
I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.
– Julian Camilleri
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo))
, but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.
def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i
The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string
from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern
.
Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.
2
This is just not pythonic at all.
– ruohola
2 hours ago
I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
This is not very readable, uses therange(len(foo))
antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
1
I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.
– Julian Camilleri
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo))
, but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.
def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i
The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string
from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern
.
Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.
This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo))
, but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.
def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i
The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string
from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern
.
Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.
answered 2 hours ago
Right legRight leg
8,70442450
8,70442450
2
This is just not pythonic at all.
– ruohola
2 hours ago
I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
This is not very readable, uses therange(len(foo))
antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
1
I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.
– Julian Camilleri
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
2
This is just not pythonic at all.
– ruohola
2 hours ago
I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
This is not very readable, uses therange(len(foo))
antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.
– ruohola
1 hour ago
1
I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.
– Julian Camilleri
1 hour ago
2
2
This is just not pythonic at all.
– ruohola
2 hours ago
This is just not pythonic at all.
– ruohola
2 hours ago
I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.
– geekoverdose
1 hour ago
@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.
– Right leg
1 hour ago
@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.
– Right leg
1 hour ago
1
1
This is not very readable, uses the
range(len(foo))
antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.– ruohola
1 hour ago
This is not very readable, uses the
range(len(foo))
antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.– ruohola
1 hour ago
1
1
I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.
– Julian Camilleri
1 hour ago
I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.
– Julian Camilleri
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55890245%2fpython-pythonic-way-to-find-last-position-in-string-that-does-not-match-regex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last
e
matches[^0-9]
pattern.– dgumo
2 hours ago
Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be
[^0-9]
. I'll update the question.– geekoverdose
2 hours ago
Should
s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa'
return the index of last char before a digit akae
(8) or the last char akaa
(19)?– ruohola
2 hours ago
1
With
uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa
it should return the last position in the string, means19
.– geekoverdose
2 hours ago