reduction from 3-SAT to Subset Sum problem Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?NAE SAT reduction to weighted MAX CUTHow to reduce from subset-sum problem?Constructing a promise problem equivalent to XSAT from subset sumQuestion on SAT reductionReduction of SUBSET-SUM to SET-PARTITIONSubset-sum variation, multiple sumsCNF-SAT reduction problem variantSubset sum NP-CompletnessKarp reduction from PARTITION to SUBSET SUMHow can I reduce Subset Sum to Almost Subset Sum?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Can this water damage be explained by lack of gutters and grading issues?

How can I introduce the names of fantasy creatures to the reader?

What could prevent concentrated local exploration?

Why is ArcGIS Pro not symbolizing my entire range of values?

Coin Game with infinite paradox

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

How do I overlay a PNG over two videos (one video overlays another) in one command using FFmpeg?

Who can become a wight?

IC on Digikey is 5x more expensive than board containing same IC on Alibaba: How?

Who's this lady in the war room?

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?

What kind of capacitor is this in the image?

Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

A German immigrant ancestor has a "Registration Affidavit of Alien Enemy" on file. What does that mean exactly?

Why "Go Out and Learn"

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

Unix AIX passing variable and arguments to expect and spawn

When speaking, how do you change your mind mid-sentence?

Can a Wizard take the Magic Initiate feat and select spells from the Wizard list?

Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem

Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public?



reduction from 3-SAT to Subset Sum problem



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?NAE SAT reduction to weighted MAX CUTHow to reduce from subset-sum problem?Constructing a promise problem equivalent to XSAT from subset sumQuestion on SAT reductionReduction of SUBSET-SUM to SET-PARTITIONSubset-sum variation, multiple sumsCNF-SAT reduction problem variantSubset sum NP-CompletnessKarp reduction from PARTITION to SUBSET SUMHow can I reduce Subset Sum to Almost Subset Sum?










1












$begingroup$


How to reduce 3-SAT to subset sum problem?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




SiluPanda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    How to reduce 3-SAT to subset sum problem?










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    SiluPanda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      How to reduce 3-SAT to subset sum problem?










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SiluPanda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      How to reduce 3-SAT to subset sum problem?







      complexity-theory automata reductions






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SiluPanda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SiluPanda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      SiluPanda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 hours ago









      SiluPandaSiluPanda

      666




      666




      New contributor




      SiluPanda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      SiluPanda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      SiluPanda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The trick to the reduction is to use numbers to encode statements about the 3CNF formula, crafting those numbers in such a way that you can later make an arithmetic proposition about the numbers that is only true if the original 3CNF formula is satisfiable. The reduction below is lifted directly from the lecture notes found at https://people.clarkson.edu/~alexis/PCMI/Notes/lectureB07.pdf .




          We reduce 3SAT to SUBSET-SUM. Consider a 3CNF formula with variables $x_1, . . . , x_n$ and clauses $c_1, . . . , c_r$. For each variable $x_i$, we will have two numbers $y_i$ and $z_i$ in the list. For each clause $c_j$, we will also have two numbers $s_j$ and $t_j$. We define all of these numbers by specifying their base 10 representations. The construction is best explained by an example and a picture. If the formula is $(x_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)∧(overlinex_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)$, then the base 10 representations of the numbers will look like this:



          beginarrayccc
          & x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & c_1 & c_2 \
          hline
          y_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
          z_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
          y_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \
          z_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
          y_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
          z_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \
          hline
          s_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
          t_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
          s_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
          t_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
          hline
          k & 1 & 1 & 1 & 3 & 3 \
          endarray



          The number $y_i$ corresponds to the positive occurrences of $x_i$ in the formula while the number $z_i$ corresponds to its negative occurrences. It should be clear how to generalize this construction to an arbitrary 3CNF formula. And the list of numbers can clearly be constructed in polynomial time. We claim that a subset of these numbers adds to exactly $k$ if and only if the formula is satisfiable. A key point is that the sum of the numbers can be done column by column, independently, because carries will never occur.




          The $s$ value is crafted the same way for each clause; put a one in the digit position corresponding to that clause, and zeroes everywhere else. The $t$ value will be the same as the $s$ value for each clause.



          The $k$ value is always 1111... followed by 33333.... where the number of ones is the same as the number of distinct variables in the formula and the number of threes is the number of clauses in the formula. Note that the required sum $k$ has a one in each digit position corresponding to the variables. This means that any solution to the subset sum problem can include only encoded statements about either a positive instance of the variable or a negative instance in each clause, not both. Note also that sum $k$ has a three in the digit position corresponding to each clause. The $s$ and $t$ values for each clause will sum to two, but to complete the sum a third one will have to come from one of the $y$ or $z$ values. All three ones could come from the $y$ and $z$ values, but the fact that $s$ and $t$ will only sum to two for any clause guarantees that any empty clause in the 3CNF formula forces the subset sum problem to become unsatisfiable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "419"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            SiluPanda is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107376%2freduction-from-3-sat-to-subset-sum-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            The trick to the reduction is to use numbers to encode statements about the 3CNF formula, crafting those numbers in such a way that you can later make an arithmetic proposition about the numbers that is only true if the original 3CNF formula is satisfiable. The reduction below is lifted directly from the lecture notes found at https://people.clarkson.edu/~alexis/PCMI/Notes/lectureB07.pdf .




            We reduce 3SAT to SUBSET-SUM. Consider a 3CNF formula with variables $x_1, . . . , x_n$ and clauses $c_1, . . . , c_r$. For each variable $x_i$, we will have two numbers $y_i$ and $z_i$ in the list. For each clause $c_j$, we will also have two numbers $s_j$ and $t_j$. We define all of these numbers by specifying their base 10 representations. The construction is best explained by an example and a picture. If the formula is $(x_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)∧(overlinex_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)$, then the base 10 representations of the numbers will look like this:



            beginarrayccc
            & x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & c_1 & c_2 \
            hline
            y_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
            z_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
            y_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \
            z_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
            y_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
            z_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \
            hline
            s_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
            t_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
            s_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
            t_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
            hline
            k & 1 & 1 & 1 & 3 & 3 \
            endarray



            The number $y_i$ corresponds to the positive occurrences of $x_i$ in the formula while the number $z_i$ corresponds to its negative occurrences. It should be clear how to generalize this construction to an arbitrary 3CNF formula. And the list of numbers can clearly be constructed in polynomial time. We claim that a subset of these numbers adds to exactly $k$ if and only if the formula is satisfiable. A key point is that the sum of the numbers can be done column by column, independently, because carries will never occur.




            The $s$ value is crafted the same way for each clause; put a one in the digit position corresponding to that clause, and zeroes everywhere else. The $t$ value will be the same as the $s$ value for each clause.



            The $k$ value is always 1111... followed by 33333.... where the number of ones is the same as the number of distinct variables in the formula and the number of threes is the number of clauses in the formula. Note that the required sum $k$ has a one in each digit position corresponding to the variables. This means that any solution to the subset sum problem can include only encoded statements about either a positive instance of the variable or a negative instance in each clause, not both. Note also that sum $k$ has a three in the digit position corresponding to each clause. The $s$ and $t$ values for each clause will sum to two, but to complete the sum a third one will have to come from one of the $y$ or $z$ values. All three ones could come from the $y$ and $z$ values, but the fact that $s$ and $t$ will only sum to two for any clause guarantees that any empty clause in the 3CNF formula forces the subset sum problem to become unsatisfiable.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              The trick to the reduction is to use numbers to encode statements about the 3CNF formula, crafting those numbers in such a way that you can later make an arithmetic proposition about the numbers that is only true if the original 3CNF formula is satisfiable. The reduction below is lifted directly from the lecture notes found at https://people.clarkson.edu/~alexis/PCMI/Notes/lectureB07.pdf .




              We reduce 3SAT to SUBSET-SUM. Consider a 3CNF formula with variables $x_1, . . . , x_n$ and clauses $c_1, . . . , c_r$. For each variable $x_i$, we will have two numbers $y_i$ and $z_i$ in the list. For each clause $c_j$, we will also have two numbers $s_j$ and $t_j$. We define all of these numbers by specifying their base 10 representations. The construction is best explained by an example and a picture. If the formula is $(x_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)∧(overlinex_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)$, then the base 10 representations of the numbers will look like this:



              beginarrayccc
              & x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & c_1 & c_2 \
              hline
              y_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
              z_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
              y_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \
              z_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
              y_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
              z_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \
              hline
              s_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
              t_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
              s_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
              t_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
              hline
              k & 1 & 1 & 1 & 3 & 3 \
              endarray



              The number $y_i$ corresponds to the positive occurrences of $x_i$ in the formula while the number $z_i$ corresponds to its negative occurrences. It should be clear how to generalize this construction to an arbitrary 3CNF formula. And the list of numbers can clearly be constructed in polynomial time. We claim that a subset of these numbers adds to exactly $k$ if and only if the formula is satisfiable. A key point is that the sum of the numbers can be done column by column, independently, because carries will never occur.




              The $s$ value is crafted the same way for each clause; put a one in the digit position corresponding to that clause, and zeroes everywhere else. The $t$ value will be the same as the $s$ value for each clause.



              The $k$ value is always 1111... followed by 33333.... where the number of ones is the same as the number of distinct variables in the formula and the number of threes is the number of clauses in the formula. Note that the required sum $k$ has a one in each digit position corresponding to the variables. This means that any solution to the subset sum problem can include only encoded statements about either a positive instance of the variable or a negative instance in each clause, not both. Note also that sum $k$ has a three in the digit position corresponding to each clause. The $s$ and $t$ values for each clause will sum to two, but to complete the sum a third one will have to come from one of the $y$ or $z$ values. All three ones could come from the $y$ and $z$ values, but the fact that $s$ and $t$ will only sum to two for any clause guarantees that any empty clause in the 3CNF formula forces the subset sum problem to become unsatisfiable.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                The trick to the reduction is to use numbers to encode statements about the 3CNF formula, crafting those numbers in such a way that you can later make an arithmetic proposition about the numbers that is only true if the original 3CNF formula is satisfiable. The reduction below is lifted directly from the lecture notes found at https://people.clarkson.edu/~alexis/PCMI/Notes/lectureB07.pdf .




                We reduce 3SAT to SUBSET-SUM. Consider a 3CNF formula with variables $x_1, . . . , x_n$ and clauses $c_1, . . . , c_r$. For each variable $x_i$, we will have two numbers $y_i$ and $z_i$ in the list. For each clause $c_j$, we will also have two numbers $s_j$ and $t_j$. We define all of these numbers by specifying their base 10 representations. The construction is best explained by an example and a picture. If the formula is $(x_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)∧(overlinex_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)$, then the base 10 representations of the numbers will look like this:



                beginarrayccc
                & x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & c_1 & c_2 \
                hline
                y_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
                z_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
                y_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \
                z_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
                y_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
                z_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \
                hline
                s_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
                t_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
                s_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
                t_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
                hline
                k & 1 & 1 & 1 & 3 & 3 \
                endarray



                The number $y_i$ corresponds to the positive occurrences of $x_i$ in the formula while the number $z_i$ corresponds to its negative occurrences. It should be clear how to generalize this construction to an arbitrary 3CNF formula. And the list of numbers can clearly be constructed in polynomial time. We claim that a subset of these numbers adds to exactly $k$ if and only if the formula is satisfiable. A key point is that the sum of the numbers can be done column by column, independently, because carries will never occur.




                The $s$ value is crafted the same way for each clause; put a one in the digit position corresponding to that clause, and zeroes everywhere else. The $t$ value will be the same as the $s$ value for each clause.



                The $k$ value is always 1111... followed by 33333.... where the number of ones is the same as the number of distinct variables in the formula and the number of threes is the number of clauses in the formula. Note that the required sum $k$ has a one in each digit position corresponding to the variables. This means that any solution to the subset sum problem can include only encoded statements about either a positive instance of the variable or a negative instance in each clause, not both. Note also that sum $k$ has a three in the digit position corresponding to each clause. The $s$ and $t$ values for each clause will sum to two, but to complete the sum a third one will have to come from one of the $y$ or $z$ values. All three ones could come from the $y$ and $z$ values, but the fact that $s$ and $t$ will only sum to two for any clause guarantees that any empty clause in the 3CNF formula forces the subset sum problem to become unsatisfiable.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The trick to the reduction is to use numbers to encode statements about the 3CNF formula, crafting those numbers in such a way that you can later make an arithmetic proposition about the numbers that is only true if the original 3CNF formula is satisfiable. The reduction below is lifted directly from the lecture notes found at https://people.clarkson.edu/~alexis/PCMI/Notes/lectureB07.pdf .




                We reduce 3SAT to SUBSET-SUM. Consider a 3CNF formula with variables $x_1, . . . , x_n$ and clauses $c_1, . . . , c_r$. For each variable $x_i$, we will have two numbers $y_i$ and $z_i$ in the list. For each clause $c_j$, we will also have two numbers $s_j$ and $t_j$. We define all of these numbers by specifying their base 10 representations. The construction is best explained by an example and a picture. If the formula is $(x_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)∧(overlinex_1∨x_2∨overlinex_3)$, then the base 10 representations of the numbers will look like this:



                beginarrayccc
                & x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & c_1 & c_2 \
                hline
                y_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
                z_1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
                y_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \
                z_2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
                y_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
                z_3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \
                hline
                s_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
                t_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
                s_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
                t_2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
                hline
                k & 1 & 1 & 1 & 3 & 3 \
                endarray



                The number $y_i$ corresponds to the positive occurrences of $x_i$ in the formula while the number $z_i$ corresponds to its negative occurrences. It should be clear how to generalize this construction to an arbitrary 3CNF formula. And the list of numbers can clearly be constructed in polynomial time. We claim that a subset of these numbers adds to exactly $k$ if and only if the formula is satisfiable. A key point is that the sum of the numbers can be done column by column, independently, because carries will never occur.




                The $s$ value is crafted the same way for each clause; put a one in the digit position corresponding to that clause, and zeroes everywhere else. The $t$ value will be the same as the $s$ value for each clause.



                The $k$ value is always 1111... followed by 33333.... where the number of ones is the same as the number of distinct variables in the formula and the number of threes is the number of clauses in the formula. Note that the required sum $k$ has a one in each digit position corresponding to the variables. This means that any solution to the subset sum problem can include only encoded statements about either a positive instance of the variable or a negative instance in each clause, not both. Note also that sum $k$ has a three in the digit position corresponding to each clause. The $s$ and $t$ values for each clause will sum to two, but to complete the sum a third one will have to come from one of the $y$ or $z$ values. All three ones could come from the $y$ and $z$ values, but the fact that $s$ and $t$ will only sum to two for any clause guarantees that any empty clause in the 3CNF formula forces the subset sum problem to become unsatisfiable.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                Kyle JonesKyle Jones

                5,81211840




                5,81211840




















                    SiluPanda is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    SiluPanda is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    SiluPanda is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    SiluPanda is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107376%2freduction-from-3-sat-to-subset-sum-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Best approach to update all entries in a list that is paginated?Best way to add items to a paginated listChoose Your Country: Best Usability approachUpdate list when a user is viewing the list without annoying themWhen would the best day to update your webpage be?What should happen when I add a Row to a paginated, sorted listShould I adopt infinite scrolling or classical pagination?How to show user that page objects automatically updateWhat is the best location to locate the comments section in a list pageBest way to combine filtering and selecting items in a listWhen one of two inputs must be updated to satisfy a consistency criteria, which should you update (if at all)?

                    Вунгтау (аеропорт) Загальні відомості | Див. також | Посилання | Навігаційне меню10°22′00″ пн. ш. 107°05′00″ сх. д. / 10.36667° пн. ш. 107.08333° сх. д. / 10.36667; 107.0833310°22′00″ пн. ш. 107°05′00″ сх. д. / 10.36667° пн. ш. 107.08333° сх. д. / 10.36667; 107.083337731608Vinh AirportVinh airport facelift improves serviceвиправивши або дописавши їївиправивши або дописавши їїр

                    Тонконіг бульбистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Екологія | Господарське значення | Примітки | Див. також | Література | Джерела | Посилання | Навігаційне меню1114601320038-241116202404kew-435458Poa bulbosaЭлектронный каталог сосудистых растений Азиатской России [Електронний каталог судинних рослин Азіатської Росії]Малышев Л. Л. Дикие родичи культурных растений. Poa bulbosa L. - Мятлик луковичный. [Малишев Л. Л. Дикі родичи культурних рослин. Poa bulbosa L. - Тонконіг бульбистий.]Мятлик (POA) Сем. Злаки (Мятликовые) [Тонконіг (POA) Род. Злаки (Тонконогові)]Poa bulbosa Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 70. 1753. 鳞茎早熟禾 lin jing zao shu he (Description from Flora of China) [Poa bulbosa Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 70. 1753. 鳞茎早熟禾 lin jing zao shu he (Опис від Флора Китаю)]Poa bulbosa L. – lipnice cibulkatá / lipnica cibulkatáPoa bulbosa в базі даних Poa bulbosa на сайті Poa bulbosa в базі даних «Global Biodiversity Information Facility» (GBIF)Poa bulbosa в базі даних «Euro + Med PlantBase» — інформаційному ресурсі для Євро-середземноморського розмаїття рослинPoa bulbosa L. на сайті «Плантариум»