What are the steps to solving this definite integral?What steps do I take to solve this integral?Solving for a variable inside a definite integralExtremely short definite integral question here?another definite integralWhat are the steps to solving this average distance problem?Help solving definite integralCalculate the integral of thisStuck on definite integral problem due to inappropriate $log$Solving definite integral in two variables.Evaluate the definite integral $int^infty _0fracx ,dxe^x -1$ using contour integration
Could the terminal length of components like resistors be reduced?
How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?
Function pointer with named arguments?
"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context
Is there any official lore on the Far Realm?
Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?
Does tea made with boiling water cool faster than tea made with boiled (but still hot) water?
Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?
A Note on N!
How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
Can an Area of Effect spell cast outside a Prismatic Wall extend inside it?
Mistake in years of experience in resume?
How can I print the prosodic symbols in LaTeX?
Which big number is bigger?
Did the BCPL programming language support floats?
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
"You've called the wrong number" or "You called the wrong number"
Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?
How can I get this effect? Please see the attached image
I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?
How to denote matrix elements succinctly?
How would 10 generations of living underground change the human body?
bldc motor, esc and battery draw, nominal vs peak
What are the steps to solving this definite integral?
What steps do I take to solve this integral?Solving for a variable inside a definite integralExtremely short definite integral question here?another definite integralWhat are the steps to solving this average distance problem?Help solving definite integralCalculate the integral of thisStuck on definite integral problem due to inappropriate $log$Solving definite integral in two variables.Evaluate the definite integral $int^infty _0fracx ,dxe^x -1$ using contour integration
$begingroup$
I am curious to know how to solve this problem; I know the answer comes out to be $1.20205$ (Apéry's constant).
$$int_0^1 fracln(1-x)ln(x)x dx= ? $$
calculus integration logarithms polylogarithm
New contributor
Coalition Coal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I am curious to know how to solve this problem; I know the answer comes out to be $1.20205$ (Apéry's constant).
$$int_0^1 fracln(1-x)ln(x)x dx= ? $$
calculus integration logarithms polylogarithm
New contributor
Coalition Coal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Did you try expanding $ln(1-x)$?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Taylor series ... expand $ln(1-x)$ in terms of powers of $x$.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to math.stackexchange please include any attempts you've made to solve the problem in your post. This will help us better help you.
$endgroup$
– Digitalis
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Did you try to integrate it by parts? By taking $u=ln(1-x)$ and $dv=fracln xxdx$
$endgroup$
– Fareed AF
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I am curious to know how to solve this problem; I know the answer comes out to be $1.20205$ (Apéry's constant).
$$int_0^1 fracln(1-x)ln(x)x dx= ? $$
calculus integration logarithms polylogarithm
New contributor
Coalition Coal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I am curious to know how to solve this problem; I know the answer comes out to be $1.20205$ (Apéry's constant).
$$int_0^1 fracln(1-x)ln(x)x dx= ? $$
calculus integration logarithms polylogarithm
calculus integration logarithms polylogarithm
New contributor
Coalition Coal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Coalition Coal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
Bernard
125k743119
125k743119
New contributor
Coalition Coal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
Coalition CoalCoalition Coal
163
163
New contributor
Coalition Coal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Coalition Coal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Coalition Coal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
$begingroup$
Did you try expanding $ln(1-x)$?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Taylor series ... expand $ln(1-x)$ in terms of powers of $x$.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to math.stackexchange please include any attempts you've made to solve the problem in your post. This will help us better help you.
$endgroup$
– Digitalis
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Did you try to integrate it by parts? By taking $u=ln(1-x)$ and $dv=fracln xxdx$
$endgroup$
– Fareed AF
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Did you try expanding $ln(1-x)$?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Taylor series ... expand $ln(1-x)$ in terms of powers of $x$.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to math.stackexchange please include any attempts you've made to solve the problem in your post. This will help us better help you.
$endgroup$
– Digitalis
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Did you try to integrate it by parts? By taking $u=ln(1-x)$ and $dv=fracln xxdx$
$endgroup$
– Fareed AF
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Did you try expanding $ln(1-x)$?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Did you try expanding $ln(1-x)$?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Taylor series ... expand $ln(1-x)$ in terms of powers of $x$.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Taylor series ... expand $ln(1-x)$ in terms of powers of $x$.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to math.stackexchange please include any attempts you've made to solve the problem in your post. This will help us better help you.
$endgroup$
– Digitalis
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to math.stackexchange please include any attempts you've made to solve the problem in your post. This will help us better help you.
$endgroup$
– Digitalis
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Did you try to integrate it by parts? By taking $u=ln(1-x)$ and $dv=fracln xxdx$
$endgroup$
– Fareed AF
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Did you try to integrate it by parts? By taking $u=ln(1-x)$ and $dv=fracln xxdx$
$endgroup$
– Fareed AF
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is a variety of possibilities how to show that this integral indeed equals $zeta(3)$, i.e. Apéry's Constant. I would like to show some of them
I: Taylor Series Expansion of $log(1-x)$
As it was first suggested within the comments (and done by FDP) we may expand the $log(1-x)$ term as Taylor Series. Specifically, by using the MacLaurin Series of the aforementioned logarithm we obtain
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=int_0^1fraclog(x)xleft[-sum_n=1^inftyfracx^nnright]mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nint_0^1x^n-1log(x)mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nleft[-frac1n^2right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
This might be the most straightforward approach possible.
II: Integration By Parts
Choosing $u=log(1-x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(x)x$ we can apply Integration By Parts which gives
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)x&=underbraceleft[log(1-x)fraclog^2(x)2right]_0^1_to0+frac12int_0^1fraclog^2(x)1-xmathrm dx\
&=frac12int_0^1log^2(x)left[sum_n=0^infty x^nright]mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1x^nlog^2(x)mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyleft[frac2(n+1)^3right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Again, we utilized a series expansion, this time the one of the geometric series.
III: Integral Representation of the Zeta Function
To use the Integral Representation of the Zeta Function here we need to reshape the integral a little bit. Starting with substitution $log(x)mapsto -x$ followed by Integration By Parts again we find
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=-int_infty^0(-x)log(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=-int_0^infty xlog(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=underbraceleft[fracx^22log(1-e^-x)right]_0^infty_to0+frac12int_0^inftyfracx^21-e^-xe^-xmathrm dx\
&=frac1Gamma(3)int_0^inftyfracx^3-1e^x-1mathrm dx\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Overall this is more or less the same as the second approach, but I wanted to bring the integral representation into play. While this approach seems to omit the usage of a series representation we need it actually in order to prove the here used representation for the Zeta Function.
IV: The Trilogarithm $operatornameLi_3(1)$
Similiar to the second approach we may chose Integration By Parts as suitable technique but instead we will apply it with $u=log(x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(1-x)x$ to get
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=underbraceleft[log(x)(-operatornameLi_2(x))right]_0^1_to0+int_0^1fracoperatornameLi_2(x)xmathrm dx\
&=[operatornameLi_3(x)]_0^1\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
A quick look at the series representation of the Trilogarithm verifies the last line.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
beginalignJ&=int_0^1 fracln(1-x)ln xx dx\
&=-int_0^1 left(sum_n=1^infty fracx^n-1nright)ln x,dx\
&=-sum_n=1^infty frac1nint_0^1 x^n-1ln x,dx\
&=sum_n=1^infty frac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Coalition Coal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3203711%2fwhat-are-the-steps-to-solving-this-definite-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is a variety of possibilities how to show that this integral indeed equals $zeta(3)$, i.e. Apéry's Constant. I would like to show some of them
I: Taylor Series Expansion of $log(1-x)$
As it was first suggested within the comments (and done by FDP) we may expand the $log(1-x)$ term as Taylor Series. Specifically, by using the MacLaurin Series of the aforementioned logarithm we obtain
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=int_0^1fraclog(x)xleft[-sum_n=1^inftyfracx^nnright]mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nint_0^1x^n-1log(x)mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nleft[-frac1n^2right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
This might be the most straightforward approach possible.
II: Integration By Parts
Choosing $u=log(1-x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(x)x$ we can apply Integration By Parts which gives
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)x&=underbraceleft[log(1-x)fraclog^2(x)2right]_0^1_to0+frac12int_0^1fraclog^2(x)1-xmathrm dx\
&=frac12int_0^1log^2(x)left[sum_n=0^infty x^nright]mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1x^nlog^2(x)mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyleft[frac2(n+1)^3right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Again, we utilized a series expansion, this time the one of the geometric series.
III: Integral Representation of the Zeta Function
To use the Integral Representation of the Zeta Function here we need to reshape the integral a little bit. Starting with substitution $log(x)mapsto -x$ followed by Integration By Parts again we find
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=-int_infty^0(-x)log(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=-int_0^infty xlog(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=underbraceleft[fracx^22log(1-e^-x)right]_0^infty_to0+frac12int_0^inftyfracx^21-e^-xe^-xmathrm dx\
&=frac1Gamma(3)int_0^inftyfracx^3-1e^x-1mathrm dx\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Overall this is more or less the same as the second approach, but I wanted to bring the integral representation into play. While this approach seems to omit the usage of a series representation we need it actually in order to prove the here used representation for the Zeta Function.
IV: The Trilogarithm $operatornameLi_3(1)$
Similiar to the second approach we may chose Integration By Parts as suitable technique but instead we will apply it with $u=log(x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(1-x)x$ to get
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=underbraceleft[log(x)(-operatornameLi_2(x))right]_0^1_to0+int_0^1fracoperatornameLi_2(x)xmathrm dx\
&=[operatornameLi_3(x)]_0^1\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
A quick look at the series representation of the Trilogarithm verifies the last line.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a variety of possibilities how to show that this integral indeed equals $zeta(3)$, i.e. Apéry's Constant. I would like to show some of them
I: Taylor Series Expansion of $log(1-x)$
As it was first suggested within the comments (and done by FDP) we may expand the $log(1-x)$ term as Taylor Series. Specifically, by using the MacLaurin Series of the aforementioned logarithm we obtain
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=int_0^1fraclog(x)xleft[-sum_n=1^inftyfracx^nnright]mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nint_0^1x^n-1log(x)mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nleft[-frac1n^2right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
This might be the most straightforward approach possible.
II: Integration By Parts
Choosing $u=log(1-x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(x)x$ we can apply Integration By Parts which gives
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)x&=underbraceleft[log(1-x)fraclog^2(x)2right]_0^1_to0+frac12int_0^1fraclog^2(x)1-xmathrm dx\
&=frac12int_0^1log^2(x)left[sum_n=0^infty x^nright]mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1x^nlog^2(x)mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyleft[frac2(n+1)^3right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Again, we utilized a series expansion, this time the one of the geometric series.
III: Integral Representation of the Zeta Function
To use the Integral Representation of the Zeta Function here we need to reshape the integral a little bit. Starting with substitution $log(x)mapsto -x$ followed by Integration By Parts again we find
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=-int_infty^0(-x)log(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=-int_0^infty xlog(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=underbraceleft[fracx^22log(1-e^-x)right]_0^infty_to0+frac12int_0^inftyfracx^21-e^-xe^-xmathrm dx\
&=frac1Gamma(3)int_0^inftyfracx^3-1e^x-1mathrm dx\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Overall this is more or less the same as the second approach, but I wanted to bring the integral representation into play. While this approach seems to omit the usage of a series representation we need it actually in order to prove the here used representation for the Zeta Function.
IV: The Trilogarithm $operatornameLi_3(1)$
Similiar to the second approach we may chose Integration By Parts as suitable technique but instead we will apply it with $u=log(x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(1-x)x$ to get
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=underbraceleft[log(x)(-operatornameLi_2(x))right]_0^1_to0+int_0^1fracoperatornameLi_2(x)xmathrm dx\
&=[operatornameLi_3(x)]_0^1\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
A quick look at the series representation of the Trilogarithm verifies the last line.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a variety of possibilities how to show that this integral indeed equals $zeta(3)$, i.e. Apéry's Constant. I would like to show some of them
I: Taylor Series Expansion of $log(1-x)$
As it was first suggested within the comments (and done by FDP) we may expand the $log(1-x)$ term as Taylor Series. Specifically, by using the MacLaurin Series of the aforementioned logarithm we obtain
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=int_0^1fraclog(x)xleft[-sum_n=1^inftyfracx^nnright]mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nint_0^1x^n-1log(x)mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nleft[-frac1n^2right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
This might be the most straightforward approach possible.
II: Integration By Parts
Choosing $u=log(1-x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(x)x$ we can apply Integration By Parts which gives
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)x&=underbraceleft[log(1-x)fraclog^2(x)2right]_0^1_to0+frac12int_0^1fraclog^2(x)1-xmathrm dx\
&=frac12int_0^1log^2(x)left[sum_n=0^infty x^nright]mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1x^nlog^2(x)mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyleft[frac2(n+1)^3right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Again, we utilized a series expansion, this time the one of the geometric series.
III: Integral Representation of the Zeta Function
To use the Integral Representation of the Zeta Function here we need to reshape the integral a little bit. Starting with substitution $log(x)mapsto -x$ followed by Integration By Parts again we find
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=-int_infty^0(-x)log(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=-int_0^infty xlog(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=underbraceleft[fracx^22log(1-e^-x)right]_0^infty_to0+frac12int_0^inftyfracx^21-e^-xe^-xmathrm dx\
&=frac1Gamma(3)int_0^inftyfracx^3-1e^x-1mathrm dx\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Overall this is more or less the same as the second approach, but I wanted to bring the integral representation into play. While this approach seems to omit the usage of a series representation we need it actually in order to prove the here used representation for the Zeta Function.
IV: The Trilogarithm $operatornameLi_3(1)$
Similiar to the second approach we may chose Integration By Parts as suitable technique but instead we will apply it with $u=log(x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(1-x)x$ to get
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=underbraceleft[log(x)(-operatornameLi_2(x))right]_0^1_to0+int_0^1fracoperatornameLi_2(x)xmathrm dx\
&=[operatornameLi_3(x)]_0^1\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
A quick look at the series representation of the Trilogarithm verifies the last line.
$endgroup$
There is a variety of possibilities how to show that this integral indeed equals $zeta(3)$, i.e. Apéry's Constant. I would like to show some of them
I: Taylor Series Expansion of $log(1-x)$
As it was first suggested within the comments (and done by FDP) we may expand the $log(1-x)$ term as Taylor Series. Specifically, by using the MacLaurin Series of the aforementioned logarithm we obtain
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=int_0^1fraclog(x)xleft[-sum_n=1^inftyfracx^nnright]mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nint_0^1x^n-1log(x)mathrm dx\
&=-sum_n=1^inftyfrac1nleft[-frac1n^2right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
This might be the most straightforward approach possible.
II: Integration By Parts
Choosing $u=log(1-x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(x)x$ we can apply Integration By Parts which gives
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)x&=underbraceleft[log(1-x)fraclog^2(x)2right]_0^1_to0+frac12int_0^1fraclog^2(x)1-xmathrm dx\
&=frac12int_0^1log^2(x)left[sum_n=0^infty x^nright]mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1x^nlog^2(x)mathrm dx\
&=frac12sum_n=0^inftyleft[frac2(n+1)^3right]\
&=sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Again, we utilized a series expansion, this time the one of the geometric series.
III: Integral Representation of the Zeta Function
To use the Integral Representation of the Zeta Function here we need to reshape the integral a little bit. Starting with substitution $log(x)mapsto -x$ followed by Integration By Parts again we find
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=-int_infty^0(-x)log(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=-int_0^infty xlog(1-e^-x)mathrm dx\
&=underbraceleft[fracx^22log(1-e^-x)right]_0^infty_to0+frac12int_0^inftyfracx^21-e^-xe^-xmathrm dx\
&=frac1Gamma(3)int_0^inftyfracx^3-1e^x-1mathrm dx\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
Overall this is more or less the same as the second approach, but I wanted to bring the integral representation into play. While this approach seems to omit the usage of a series representation we need it actually in order to prove the here used representation for the Zeta Function.
IV: The Trilogarithm $operatornameLi_3(1)$
Similiar to the second approach we may chose Integration By Parts as suitable technique but instead we will apply it with $u=log(x)$ and $mathrm dv=fraclog(1-x)x$ to get
beginalign*
int_0^1fraclog(1-x)log(x)xmathrm dx&=underbraceleft[log(x)(-operatornameLi_2(x))right]_0^1_to0+int_0^1fracoperatornameLi_2(x)xmathrm dx\
&=[operatornameLi_3(x)]_0^1\
&=zeta(3)
endalign*
A quick look at the series representation of the Trilogarithm verifies the last line.
answered 56 mins ago
mrtaurhomrtaurho
6,29071742
6,29071742
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
beginalignJ&=int_0^1 fracln(1-x)ln xx dx\
&=-int_0^1 left(sum_n=1^infty fracx^n-1nright)ln x,dx\
&=-sum_n=1^infty frac1nint_0^1 x^n-1ln x,dx\
&=sum_n=1^infty frac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
beginalignJ&=int_0^1 fracln(1-x)ln xx dx\
&=-int_0^1 left(sum_n=1^infty fracx^n-1nright)ln x,dx\
&=-sum_n=1^infty frac1nint_0^1 x^n-1ln x,dx\
&=sum_n=1^infty frac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
beginalignJ&=int_0^1 fracln(1-x)ln xx dx\
&=-int_0^1 left(sum_n=1^infty fracx^n-1nright)ln x,dx\
&=-sum_n=1^infty frac1nint_0^1 x^n-1ln x,dx\
&=sum_n=1^infty frac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign
$endgroup$
beginalignJ&=int_0^1 fracln(1-x)ln xx dx\
&=-int_0^1 left(sum_n=1^infty fracx^n-1nright)ln x,dx\
&=-sum_n=1^infty frac1nint_0^1 x^n-1ln x,dx\
&=sum_n=1^infty frac1n^3\
&=zeta(3)
endalign
answered 1 hour ago
FDPFDP
6,28211931
6,28211931
add a comment |
add a comment |
Coalition Coal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Coalition Coal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Coalition Coal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Coalition Coal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3203711%2fwhat-are-the-steps-to-solving-this-definite-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Did you try expanding $ln(1-x)$?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Taylor series ... expand $ln(1-x)$ in terms of powers of $x$.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to math.stackexchange please include any attempts you've made to solve the problem in your post. This will help us better help you.
$endgroup$
– Digitalis
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Did you try to integrate it by parts? By taking $u=ln(1-x)$ and $dv=fracln xxdx$
$endgroup$
– Fareed AF
1 hour ago