Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?Can you determine whether a compound can form given particular elements?Except pure alloys, are there any compounds with more metal elements proportion of atoms than nonmetal elements in proportion of atoms?How can transition metals form so many bonds with ligands?Why do different elements form different types of carbides?Can our chemical elements be differents on other universes?Can Carbon Form bonds without Hybridization?Why can two carbon atoms not form more than triple bond with each other?How many bonds can nitrogen form?Textbook Claim: “… in all cases it is the electrostatic force acting between charged particles that is responsible for all the forms of bonding.”Why is it not possible for seven close copper atoms to come together to gain a noble-gas configuration of valence electrons?
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
Is there any official lore on the Far Realm?
How can I practically buy stocks?
Betweenness centrality formula
As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?
Can I grease a crank spindle/bracket without disassembling the crank set?
Map of water taps to fill bottles
Who was the lone kid in the line of people at the lake at the end of Avengers: Endgame?
Could the terminal length of components like resistors be reduced?
Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?
"You've called the wrong number" or "You called the wrong number"
Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?
How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?
What term is being referred to with "reflected-sound-of-underground-spirits"?
Coordinate my way to the name of the (video) game
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
On The Origin of Dissonant Chords
How did Captain America manage to do this?
Dynamic SOQL query relationship with field visibility for Users
How to denote matrix elements succinctly?
Overlay of two functions leaves gaps
Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?
Can you determine whether a compound can form given particular elements?Except pure alloys, are there any compounds with more metal elements proportion of atoms than nonmetal elements in proportion of atoms?How can transition metals form so many bonds with ligands?Why do different elements form different types of carbides?Can our chemical elements be differents on other universes?Can Carbon Form bonds without Hybridization?Why can two carbon atoms not form more than triple bond with each other?How many bonds can nitrogen form?Textbook Claim: “… in all cases it is the electrostatic force acting between charged particles that is responsible for all the forms of bonding.”Why is it not possible for seven close copper atoms to come together to gain a noble-gas configuration of valence electrons?
$begingroup$
My textbook says the following:
Unique among the elements, carbon can bond to itself to form extremely strong two-dimensional sheets, as it does in graphite, as well as buckyballs and nanotubes.
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this? Is there a term to describe such elements?
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
bond elements
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
My textbook says the following:
Unique among the elements, carbon can bond to itself to form extremely strong two-dimensional sheets, as it does in graphite, as well as buckyballs and nanotubes.
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this? Is there a term to describe such elements?
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
bond elements
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Another case is black phosphorus allotrope en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_phosphorus
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
14 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
13 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
3 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
My textbook says the following:
Unique among the elements, carbon can bond to itself to form extremely strong two-dimensional sheets, as it does in graphite, as well as buckyballs and nanotubes.
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this? Is there a term to describe such elements?
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
bond elements
$endgroup$
My textbook says the following:
Unique among the elements, carbon can bond to itself to form extremely strong two-dimensional sheets, as it does in graphite, as well as buckyballs and nanotubes.
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this? Is there a term to describe such elements?
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
bond elements
bond elements
edited 34 mins ago
Karsten Theis
5,137644
5,137644
asked 14 hours ago
The PointerThe Pointer
1814
1814
$begingroup$
Another case is black phosphorus allotrope en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_phosphorus
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
14 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
13 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
3 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Another case is black phosphorus allotrope en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_phosphorus
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
14 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
13 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Another case is black phosphorus allotrope en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_phosphorus
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Another case is black phosphorus allotrope en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_phosphorus
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
14 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
13 hours ago
8
8
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
11 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
3 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
New contributor
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114364%2felements-other-than-carbon-that-can-form-many-different-compounds-by-bonding-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
$endgroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
edited 9 hours ago
Martin - マーチン♦
34.1k9112239
34.1k9112239
answered 13 hours ago
user79161user79161
1686
1686
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
New contributor
$endgroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 9 hours ago
Charlie GogoiCharlie Gogoi
91
91
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
New contributor
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
New contributor
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
New contributor
$endgroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
andselisk
19.9k667129
19.9k667129
New contributor
answered 4 hours ago
Santiago ArellanoSantiago Arellano
12
12
New contributor
New contributor
2
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
2 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114364%2felements-other-than-carbon-that-can-form-many-different-compounds-by-bonding-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Another case is black phosphorus allotrope en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_phosphorus
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
14 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
13 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
3 hours ago