How to avoid repetitive long generic constraints in RustIs it possible to automatically implement a trait for any tuple that is made up of types that all implement the trait?Is there a constraint that restricts my generic method to numeric types?How can foreign key constraints be temporarily disabled using T-SQL?How do I use reflection to call a generic method?How to create a generic array in Java?How to get a class instance of generics type THow is `last` allowed to be called for an Args value?How to implement a trait for a parameterized traitAvoiding PhantomData in a struct to enforce type constraintsIs it possible to return part of a struct by reference?Associated References types as Value Types
Hosting Wordpress in a EC2 Load Balanced Instance
Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?
How can I add custom success page
Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?
What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?
Where to refill my bottle in India?
COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?
What's the difference between repeating elections every few years and repeating a referendum after a few years?
Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?
If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?
Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco
What is GPS' 19 year rollover and does it present a cybersecurity issue?
What does 'script /dev/null' do?
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money
Finding files for which a command fails
"My colleague's body is amazing"
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
"listening to me about as much as you're listening to this pole here"
Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python
Symmetry in quantum mechanics
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
Why doesn't a const reference extend the life of a temporary object passed via a function?
Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors
How to avoid repetitive long generic constraints in Rust
Is it possible to automatically implement a trait for any tuple that is made up of types that all implement the trait?Is there a constraint that restricts my generic method to numeric types?How can foreign key constraints be temporarily disabled using T-SQL?How do I use reflection to call a generic method?How to create a generic array in Java?How to get a class instance of generics type THow is `last` allowed to be called for an Args value?How to implement a trait for a parameterized traitAvoiding PhantomData in a struct to enforce type constraintsIs it possible to return part of a struct by reference?Associated References types as Value Types
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I'm trying to make my own implementation of big integers (just for education). The implementation is generic by data type:
struct LongNum<T>
where T: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
values: Vec<T>,
powers: Vec<u8>,
radix: u8,
The problem is that I need to repeat this verbose constraint for T in all impls. It's too cumbersome.
I can make my own trait combining these constraints, like this:
trait LongNumValue: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
struct LongNum<T: LongNumValue>
values: Vec<T>,
powers: Vec<u8>,
radix: u8,
But in this case I have to add impls for this LongNumValue trait to all types which can be used in LongNum:
impl LongNumValue for u8
impl LongNumValue for u16
impl LongNumValue for u32
...
This means that if I don't add some type to this list of impls, the user of my crate will be unable to use this type for LongNum, even if this type is passes all constraints.
Is there any way to avoid writing long repetitive costraints without adding unnecessary restrictions to user?
generics rust constraints traits
add a comment |
I'm trying to make my own implementation of big integers (just for education). The implementation is generic by data type:
struct LongNum<T>
where T: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
values: Vec<T>,
powers: Vec<u8>,
radix: u8,
The problem is that I need to repeat this verbose constraint for T in all impls. It's too cumbersome.
I can make my own trait combining these constraints, like this:
trait LongNumValue: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
struct LongNum<T: LongNumValue>
values: Vec<T>,
powers: Vec<u8>,
radix: u8,
But in this case I have to add impls for this LongNumValue trait to all types which can be used in LongNum:
impl LongNumValue for u8
impl LongNumValue for u16
impl LongNumValue for u32
...
This means that if I don't add some type to this list of impls, the user of my crate will be unable to use this type for LongNum, even if this type is passes all constraints.
Is there any way to avoid writing long repetitive costraints without adding unnecessary restrictions to user?
generics rust constraints traits
1
You mean something similar to this? stackoverflow.com/questions/55553281/…
– hellow
17 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm trying to make my own implementation of big integers (just for education). The implementation is generic by data type:
struct LongNum<T>
where T: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
values: Vec<T>,
powers: Vec<u8>,
radix: u8,
The problem is that I need to repeat this verbose constraint for T in all impls. It's too cumbersome.
I can make my own trait combining these constraints, like this:
trait LongNumValue: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
struct LongNum<T: LongNumValue>
values: Vec<T>,
powers: Vec<u8>,
radix: u8,
But in this case I have to add impls for this LongNumValue trait to all types which can be used in LongNum:
impl LongNumValue for u8
impl LongNumValue for u16
impl LongNumValue for u32
...
This means that if I don't add some type to this list of impls, the user of my crate will be unable to use this type for LongNum, even if this type is passes all constraints.
Is there any way to avoid writing long repetitive costraints without adding unnecessary restrictions to user?
generics rust constraints traits
I'm trying to make my own implementation of big integers (just for education). The implementation is generic by data type:
struct LongNum<T>
where T: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
values: Vec<T>,
powers: Vec<u8>,
radix: u8,
The problem is that I need to repeat this verbose constraint for T in all impls. It's too cumbersome.
I can make my own trait combining these constraints, like this:
trait LongNumValue: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
struct LongNum<T: LongNumValue>
values: Vec<T>,
powers: Vec<u8>,
radix: u8,
But in this case I have to add impls for this LongNumValue trait to all types which can be used in LongNum:
impl LongNumValue for u8
impl LongNumValue for u16
impl LongNumValue for u32
...
This means that if I don't add some type to this list of impls, the user of my crate will be unable to use this type for LongNum, even if this type is passes all constraints.
Is there any way to avoid writing long repetitive costraints without adding unnecessary restrictions to user?
generics rust constraints traits
generics rust constraints traits
asked 17 hours ago
Michael IlyinMichael Ilyin
12426
12426
1
You mean something similar to this? stackoverflow.com/questions/55553281/…
– hellow
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1
You mean something similar to this? stackoverflow.com/questions/55553281/…
– hellow
17 hours ago
1
1
You mean something similar to this? stackoverflow.com/questions/55553281/…
– hellow
17 hours ago
You mean something similar to this? stackoverflow.com/questions/55553281/…
– hellow
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can add a blanket implementation:
impl<T> LongNumValue for T
where
T: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55568655%2fhow-to-avoid-repetitive-long-generic-constraints-in-rust%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can add a blanket implementation:
impl<T> LongNumValue for T
where
T: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
add a comment |
You can add a blanket implementation:
impl<T> LongNumValue for T
where
T: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
add a comment |
You can add a blanket implementation:
impl<T> LongNumValue for T
where
T: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
You can add a blanket implementation:
impl<T> LongNumValue for T
where
T: Integer + MulAssign + CheckedMul + CheckedAdd + Copy + From<u8>
answered 17 hours ago
starbluestarblue
45.6k1177138
45.6k1177138
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55568655%2fhow-to-avoid-repetitive-long-generic-constraints-in-rust%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
You mean something similar to this? stackoverflow.com/questions/55553281/…
– hellow
17 hours ago