How to answer pointed “are you quitting” questioning when I don't want them to suspectMy manager told me I should feel comfortable about telling him if I want to leave the company. Should I tell him?My current boss asks surprising questions which haven't been asked by a boss before, how should I respond?Politics in implementing a belief for a projectHow to gauge how much to justify oneselfMail response time and delayTroubles communicating with my bossWhat to do when your boss holds an investigation against you when you are not formally suspectedHow and when do you tell your boss that you are moving and want to transfer?How do I convince my employer to take my mention of resignation seriously?Quit Job without burning bridges. Dislike company, like ownerAsking for a raise when you are quitting for future job search
Finding files for which a command fails
aging parents with no investments
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
Crop image to path created in TikZ?
Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?
Ideas for 3rd eye abilities
What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution
What does 'script /dev/null' do?
Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?
Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?
Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python
Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco
Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning
Eliminate empty elements from a list with a specific pattern
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)
Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?
LWC and complex parameters
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?
Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money
How to answer pointed “are you quitting” questioning when I don't want them to suspect
My manager told me I should feel comfortable about telling him if I want to leave the company. Should I tell him?My current boss asks surprising questions which haven't been asked by a boss before, how should I respond?Politics in implementing a belief for a projectHow to gauge how much to justify oneselfMail response time and delayTroubles communicating with my bossWhat to do when your boss holds an investigation against you when you are not formally suspectedHow and when do you tell your boss that you are moving and want to transfer?How do I convince my employer to take my mention of resignation seriously?Quit Job without burning bridges. Dislike company, like ownerAsking for a raise when you are quitting for future job search
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
"[Not] telling your boss you're quitting" is a broad issue spread over many questions, the closest duplicate to mine is probably here. The consensus is that you have no obligation to prewarn employers that you're looking elsewhere and there are unnecessary risks in doing so.
My question is not about what I "should" do (see above) but how to do it. Specifically, how to maintain the above reasonable desire for privacy in the face of my boss' reasonable desire to know my intentions ASAP. This is a simple conflict of interests whereby I'm trying to delay coming clean until I have a new offer and he's trying to catch as much warning of unhappiness graduating to active job search as he can.
Probably this wouldn't even be an issue if I could just do the strategic dishonesty that seems to be so widely justified these days. Morals aside I am simply a very poor liar. My boss by contrast is very experienced at getting things out of people and will have had this specific conversation many times before.
We are having a meeting later wherein I predict I am to be 'cornered'. He will enquire as to my unhappiness. I will give a vague answer. He will ask directly and pointedly whether I'm considering leaving.
What do I say then? Flat out lie? Maybe you can see now the level of response I'm looking for - how do I navigate this social situation, what words do I say?
Let's say I respond "no I've not been considering leaving". He will point to the context of my apparent unhappiness etc., there might be some discussion, but ultimately that'll all be in the service of re-asking the question from a new angle. This will continue for as long as he doubts my answer and can think of new angles from which to pry open my true intentions.
How does one withstand this with professionalism? All the previous answers just say "you shouldn't tell your boss you're going" without recognising the boss' obvious motivation to work against that.
"Just keep giving the same answer" won't cut it without an unprofessional degree of absurdity. Remember he is probably aware of that tactic and actively trying to lever it out of the way. Vagueness will be countered with specificity - lots of 'surrounding' questions again all attacking the central one. How do I answer those questions? I can't just act like a robot with one canned response...
professionalism management quitting
New contributor
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 5 more comments
"[Not] telling your boss you're quitting" is a broad issue spread over many questions, the closest duplicate to mine is probably here. The consensus is that you have no obligation to prewarn employers that you're looking elsewhere and there are unnecessary risks in doing so.
My question is not about what I "should" do (see above) but how to do it. Specifically, how to maintain the above reasonable desire for privacy in the face of my boss' reasonable desire to know my intentions ASAP. This is a simple conflict of interests whereby I'm trying to delay coming clean until I have a new offer and he's trying to catch as much warning of unhappiness graduating to active job search as he can.
Probably this wouldn't even be an issue if I could just do the strategic dishonesty that seems to be so widely justified these days. Morals aside I am simply a very poor liar. My boss by contrast is very experienced at getting things out of people and will have had this specific conversation many times before.
We are having a meeting later wherein I predict I am to be 'cornered'. He will enquire as to my unhappiness. I will give a vague answer. He will ask directly and pointedly whether I'm considering leaving.
What do I say then? Flat out lie? Maybe you can see now the level of response I'm looking for - how do I navigate this social situation, what words do I say?
Let's say I respond "no I've not been considering leaving". He will point to the context of my apparent unhappiness etc., there might be some discussion, but ultimately that'll all be in the service of re-asking the question from a new angle. This will continue for as long as he doubts my answer and can think of new angles from which to pry open my true intentions.
How does one withstand this with professionalism? All the previous answers just say "you shouldn't tell your boss you're going" without recognising the boss' obvious motivation to work against that.
"Just keep giving the same answer" won't cut it without an unprofessional degree of absurdity. Remember he is probably aware of that tactic and actively trying to lever it out of the way. Vagueness will be countered with specificity - lots of 'surrounding' questions again all attacking the central one. How do I answer those questions? I can't just act like a robot with one canned response...
professionalism management quitting
New contributor
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I had added an answer, but this is just a duplicate actually
– Atizs
14 hours ago
3
Are you committed to leaving? Is there absolutely no way you can have a conversation about your situation and he can attempt to fix whatever it is you are unhappy with? That would be a more mutually fruitful situation. If he doesn't know, he cannot help but I realise that's not necessarily the case.
– LoztInSpace
14 hours ago
2
@Nivas why not make this an answer?
– Mark
12 hours ago
2
I will add one more to @Nivas which are great: "Why would you ask that"? The bottom line is that, like most people, managers tend to think they are wonderful at their job and everyone wants to work for them. No need to dissuade them from that illusion.
– Pete B.
11 hours ago
Lying isn't always wrong. In the Old Testament, the midwives lie to Pharoah, who ordered them to kill all Hebrew male infants. God Himself rewards them for their lying. So at least in the Judeo-Christian moral system, lying is OK, even honorable and required, in certain situations. To save a life, for instance, or to throw a surprise party, or in the case above where the truth would cause harm. You're probably a bad liar because your conscience is bothering you. Your conscience is clear here. The boss is a predator and you're protecting your career.
– B. Goddard
10 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
"[Not] telling your boss you're quitting" is a broad issue spread over many questions, the closest duplicate to mine is probably here. The consensus is that you have no obligation to prewarn employers that you're looking elsewhere and there are unnecessary risks in doing so.
My question is not about what I "should" do (see above) but how to do it. Specifically, how to maintain the above reasonable desire for privacy in the face of my boss' reasonable desire to know my intentions ASAP. This is a simple conflict of interests whereby I'm trying to delay coming clean until I have a new offer and he's trying to catch as much warning of unhappiness graduating to active job search as he can.
Probably this wouldn't even be an issue if I could just do the strategic dishonesty that seems to be so widely justified these days. Morals aside I am simply a very poor liar. My boss by contrast is very experienced at getting things out of people and will have had this specific conversation many times before.
We are having a meeting later wherein I predict I am to be 'cornered'. He will enquire as to my unhappiness. I will give a vague answer. He will ask directly and pointedly whether I'm considering leaving.
What do I say then? Flat out lie? Maybe you can see now the level of response I'm looking for - how do I navigate this social situation, what words do I say?
Let's say I respond "no I've not been considering leaving". He will point to the context of my apparent unhappiness etc., there might be some discussion, but ultimately that'll all be in the service of re-asking the question from a new angle. This will continue for as long as he doubts my answer and can think of new angles from which to pry open my true intentions.
How does one withstand this with professionalism? All the previous answers just say "you shouldn't tell your boss you're going" without recognising the boss' obvious motivation to work against that.
"Just keep giving the same answer" won't cut it without an unprofessional degree of absurdity. Remember he is probably aware of that tactic and actively trying to lever it out of the way. Vagueness will be countered with specificity - lots of 'surrounding' questions again all attacking the central one. How do I answer those questions? I can't just act like a robot with one canned response...
professionalism management quitting
New contributor
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
"[Not] telling your boss you're quitting" is a broad issue spread over many questions, the closest duplicate to mine is probably here. The consensus is that you have no obligation to prewarn employers that you're looking elsewhere and there are unnecessary risks in doing so.
My question is not about what I "should" do (see above) but how to do it. Specifically, how to maintain the above reasonable desire for privacy in the face of my boss' reasonable desire to know my intentions ASAP. This is a simple conflict of interests whereby I'm trying to delay coming clean until I have a new offer and he's trying to catch as much warning of unhappiness graduating to active job search as he can.
Probably this wouldn't even be an issue if I could just do the strategic dishonesty that seems to be so widely justified these days. Morals aside I am simply a very poor liar. My boss by contrast is very experienced at getting things out of people and will have had this specific conversation many times before.
We are having a meeting later wherein I predict I am to be 'cornered'. He will enquire as to my unhappiness. I will give a vague answer. He will ask directly and pointedly whether I'm considering leaving.
What do I say then? Flat out lie? Maybe you can see now the level of response I'm looking for - how do I navigate this social situation, what words do I say?
Let's say I respond "no I've not been considering leaving". He will point to the context of my apparent unhappiness etc., there might be some discussion, but ultimately that'll all be in the service of re-asking the question from a new angle. This will continue for as long as he doubts my answer and can think of new angles from which to pry open my true intentions.
How does one withstand this with professionalism? All the previous answers just say "you shouldn't tell your boss you're going" without recognising the boss' obvious motivation to work against that.
"Just keep giving the same answer" won't cut it without an unprofessional degree of absurdity. Remember he is probably aware of that tactic and actively trying to lever it out of the way. Vagueness will be countered with specificity - lots of 'surrounding' questions again all attacking the central one. How do I answer those questions? I can't just act like a robot with one canned response...
professionalism management quitting
professionalism management quitting
New contributor
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 14 hours ago
disillusioned_postdocdisillusioned_postdoc
231124
231124
New contributor
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I had added an answer, but this is just a duplicate actually
– Atizs
14 hours ago
3
Are you committed to leaving? Is there absolutely no way you can have a conversation about your situation and he can attempt to fix whatever it is you are unhappy with? That would be a more mutually fruitful situation. If he doesn't know, he cannot help but I realise that's not necessarily the case.
– LoztInSpace
14 hours ago
2
@Nivas why not make this an answer?
– Mark
12 hours ago
2
I will add one more to @Nivas which are great: "Why would you ask that"? The bottom line is that, like most people, managers tend to think they are wonderful at their job and everyone wants to work for them. No need to dissuade them from that illusion.
– Pete B.
11 hours ago
Lying isn't always wrong. In the Old Testament, the midwives lie to Pharoah, who ordered them to kill all Hebrew male infants. God Himself rewards them for their lying. So at least in the Judeo-Christian moral system, lying is OK, even honorable and required, in certain situations. To save a life, for instance, or to throw a surprise party, or in the case above where the truth would cause harm. You're probably a bad liar because your conscience is bothering you. Your conscience is clear here. The boss is a predator and you're protecting your career.
– B. Goddard
10 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
I had added an answer, but this is just a duplicate actually
– Atizs
14 hours ago
3
Are you committed to leaving? Is there absolutely no way you can have a conversation about your situation and he can attempt to fix whatever it is you are unhappy with? That would be a more mutually fruitful situation. If he doesn't know, he cannot help but I realise that's not necessarily the case.
– LoztInSpace
14 hours ago
2
@Nivas why not make this an answer?
– Mark
12 hours ago
2
I will add one more to @Nivas which are great: "Why would you ask that"? The bottom line is that, like most people, managers tend to think they are wonderful at their job and everyone wants to work for them. No need to dissuade them from that illusion.
– Pete B.
11 hours ago
Lying isn't always wrong. In the Old Testament, the midwives lie to Pharoah, who ordered them to kill all Hebrew male infants. God Himself rewards them for their lying. So at least in the Judeo-Christian moral system, lying is OK, even honorable and required, in certain situations. To save a life, for instance, or to throw a surprise party, or in the case above where the truth would cause harm. You're probably a bad liar because your conscience is bothering you. Your conscience is clear here. The boss is a predator and you're protecting your career.
– B. Goddard
10 hours ago
I had added an answer, but this is just a duplicate actually
– Atizs
14 hours ago
I had added an answer, but this is just a duplicate actually
– Atizs
14 hours ago
3
3
Are you committed to leaving? Is there absolutely no way you can have a conversation about your situation and he can attempt to fix whatever it is you are unhappy with? That would be a more mutually fruitful situation. If he doesn't know, he cannot help but I realise that's not necessarily the case.
– LoztInSpace
14 hours ago
Are you committed to leaving? Is there absolutely no way you can have a conversation about your situation and he can attempt to fix whatever it is you are unhappy with? That would be a more mutually fruitful situation. If he doesn't know, he cannot help but I realise that's not necessarily the case.
– LoztInSpace
14 hours ago
2
2
@Nivas why not make this an answer?
– Mark
12 hours ago
@Nivas why not make this an answer?
– Mark
12 hours ago
2
2
I will add one more to @Nivas which are great: "Why would you ask that"? The bottom line is that, like most people, managers tend to think they are wonderful at their job and everyone wants to work for them. No need to dissuade them from that illusion.
– Pete B.
11 hours ago
I will add one more to @Nivas which are great: "Why would you ask that"? The bottom line is that, like most people, managers tend to think they are wonderful at their job and everyone wants to work for them. No need to dissuade them from that illusion.
– Pete B.
11 hours ago
Lying isn't always wrong. In the Old Testament, the midwives lie to Pharoah, who ordered them to kill all Hebrew male infants. God Himself rewards them for their lying. So at least in the Judeo-Christian moral system, lying is OK, even honorable and required, in certain situations. To save a life, for instance, or to throw a surprise party, or in the case above where the truth would cause harm. You're probably a bad liar because your conscience is bothering you. Your conscience is clear here. The boss is a predator and you're protecting your career.
– B. Goddard
10 hours ago
Lying isn't always wrong. In the Old Testament, the midwives lie to Pharoah, who ordered them to kill all Hebrew male infants. God Himself rewards them for their lying. So at least in the Judeo-Christian moral system, lying is OK, even honorable and required, in certain situations. To save a life, for instance, or to throw a surprise party, or in the case above where the truth would cause harm. You're probably a bad liar because your conscience is bothering you. Your conscience is clear here. The boss is a predator and you're protecting your career.
– B. Goddard
10 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
"Not unless I get a better offer!"
It is actually true. You're not leaving unless you get a better offer and until you hand in your notice. That is as true today as every other day.
You can say as much, and your boss will probably ask "Are you looking?" - but it's normal and acceptable for employees to keep an eye on the job market, and for recruiters to contact you (via LinkedIn or from an old CV, or any other method). You should do this anyway, to ensure you're being paid something close to the market average, and to track which skills are in demand.
He may ask whether you've been to an interview, which you can probably answer truthfully. Eventually he'll be asking "Would you leave if someone offered you more money and/or better conditions?" to which you could truthfully answer "well, duh!" ;-)
4
You make a good point. Fundamentally, employment is a mutual relationship of exchanging time and skills, for compensation. I'm as loyal as they come, just as long as you're paying me.
– Sobrique
12 hours ago
40
Agreed. "Are you quitting?" can honestly be responded to with a "No" up until the point at which OP puts in a notice. To elaborate, there is no deceit in this, because until there is a signed offer, presumably OP is not in fact quitting. "Are you looking?" can honestly be responded to with an "Of course I have my eyes open, just as everyone should! Those who don't are doing themselves a disservice."
– maxathousand
11 hours ago
16
Also, the correct answer to "Are you looking" is "I'm always looking".
– aleppke
10 hours ago
3
I've heard this phrase, and it may even be a choice on LinkedIn, I don't recall. "Happily employed but open to great opportunities."
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
2
@ShinEmperor Sure, but "Are you quitting?" is a different question than "Are you planning on quitting soon?" to which OP can still honestly say they have no plans to resign. Again, until there is another signed offer, it seems that OP's plans are to continue working for the current company. Finding a new job could take years.
– maxathousand
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
This question falls in the category “If you don’t want to hear lies, then don’t ask this question”. Your answer is “No”, or “No, what makes you think that”. You should give exactly the same answer as someone who doesn’t have the slightest desire to leave.
Why is it Ok to lie? Because the question shouldn’t have been asked. And because you need to lie to avoid having unjustified problems. It is entirely your right to tell your boss that you think about leaving the moment you give notice, and not one second earlier.
43
The problem with this is that OP isn't comfortable lying, and feels that the boss would spot it straight away. In that situation, a poor lie is effectively both admitting the truth and insulting the boss by lying.
– Robin Bennett
12 hours ago
3
-1 OP is not asking whether it is moral to lie, but how to actually do it, "technically".
– AnoE
10 hours ago
8
Then don't make it a lie. You wouldn't consider leaving before accepting another offer, right? So until that happens, saying you aren't considering leaving is absolutely the truth right up until the moment you are ready to hand in your resignation.
– Seth R
9 hours ago
3
Lying is wrong whether or not anyone else plays by the rules. What if OP responds as you suggest and then the next day or next week accepts a job and puts in his notice? It's going to be clear that he's been lying which diminishes his reputation.
– JeffC
7 hours ago
2
@JeffC OP would not really be lying. You are not officially leaving until you put in your notice. So if OP has not put in notice, he/she can answer no with a clear conscience
– Joker28322
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
I've been in this situation before, and honestly I regretted caving in and telling them. If I had to do it again, I would rather flat-out lie than tell the truth; as unprofessional as it may be to lie, it's also unprofessional for them to put you in that position. Regardless, here are two ways you can get around this without barefaced lies.
With jokes
In an informal conversation, if you want to avoid outright lying, you can use humour to imply things without actually saying them.
Something like "Actually I feel quite tied to this place. If only because no one will pass me the scissors to cut the rope" might work.
Or you might be a little daring and liken it to a relationship with a jealous lover: " I thought you trusted me, . If you cant trust me, maybe we should see other people". The added metaphorical ballsiness of this joke might work even further in your favour, but definitely make sure that you know this will be taken as a joke before trying!
It catches your boss off-guard, makes the conversation feel a little less like an interrogation, and it implies that you want to stay. Remember, it's not a lie if you're telling a joke. Humour can let you get away with all sorts.
With deflection
If it's more formal, to the point where you can't appropriately work in the humour aspect but still don't want to bald-face lie, talk about the things you like about this place but don't word it in a way that makes it obvious that you are deflecting.
An example might be: "You know, I'm actually okay, I mean the people are nice and the perks are useful". All of those things might be true, but none of them mean that you are or aren't looking elsewhere. "I'm okay" is not "I'm staying".
I appreciate this will all feel like mental gymnastics at this point, but it's your best shield against this type of boss.
3
A joke can be the literal truth. "Well, I'm not likely to be working here for ever" is as good a response as any.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
In the joke category: why, do you want to get rid of me?
– Bernhard
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I've been in a very similar situation in the past with a manager who seemed to have no boundaries. I'm also not a great liar. I was asked if I was intending to leave, to which I responded:
I'm not actively looking for a new job.
The word actively was key to me being able to say this truthfully.
When pressed further by my manager, asking whether I'd take another job if it were offered, I said:
I'm sure you'd agree that I'd be foolish to sabotage my career by passing up a great opportunity. I don't have anything on the table at the moment, but you would be the first to know if I decide to pursue a job elsewhere.
If you're presented with more questions around this, from different angles, repeat the same thing with different words, using phrases such as:
I'm not interviewing at the moment
I don't plan to leave
I don't have any plans right now
I would let you know immediately if anything changes
It can also be really useful when somebody is trying to pry information from you to prefix your response with:
Like I said...
This indicates that you're not going to be browbeaten into saying something you don't want to.
I suppose this does fall under the umbrella of being evasive, but it avoids lying outright, which can be easier to pull off. I'm aware that it's similar to the current top rated answer, but thought some other phrases could be useful.
New contributor
Arronical is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
he's trying to catch as much warning of unhappiness graduating to active job search as he can.
Isn't this a good thing? You don't mention what you think he will do if he figures it out. You also didn't mention if you've given him the chance to understand why you're unhappy and are working on leaving.
Unless you're expecting to be fired on the spot (I presume you're American) what would the harm be in simply engaging him on his suspicion and saying: "Good of you to notice my unhappiness, here's what I'm unhappy about"? By focusing on that instead of your actual plans to leave, you can give him insight into what he could improve.
Your conclusion that people seem to advise to say nothing may be missing the point. There is no (or shouldn't be) any harm in giving your boss a chance before moving on. Once you've given them a chance and they don't listen, sure. But if you've mentioned your discontent before then I don't see why your boss would be 'cornering' you to get you to tell him why you're unhappy.
New contributor
Simmetric is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
I'd argue it's almost definitely not a good thing due to the specific phrasing. Boss isn't trying to catch warning of unhappiness, boss is trying to catch warning of unhappiness turning to job search. Which pretty heavily implies boss knows of unhappiness. And a boss trying to "catch" employees looking to leave rather than helping dampen the unhappiness isn't a boss I want to work for.
– Delioth
10 hours ago
add a comment |
You can be as forward as him without lying:
If he ask you if you are unhappy and why you can get into detail about this, this is regular stuff so far.
When it comes to:
Are you considering leaving the company?
Just answer:
Sorry but I'm not willing to talk about that, I've already mention what are the things that bother me and can be improved, we should focus on that. If eventually decide to leave I'll let you know in the notice period agreed in our work contract.
12
If I was your boss and you said that I would know you had one for out the door.
– bruglesco
13 hours ago
@bruglesco I agree completely with your comment.
– JustSaying
13 hours ago
3
I don't read any of these comments as promoting lying. Just saying that this answer is a little too elaborate to be dismissed as something other than deflection, and that ends up implying the very thing OP is trying to avoid admitting. Even moreso if, as you suggest, the boss already suspects OP might be leaving.
– Steve-O
12 hours ago
1
The most voted answer is to lie because the question shouldn't be asked. If someone ask you something he/she shouldn't ask that gives you the right to lie? no! you refuse to answer. I know op don't want tthem to suspect, I'm just questioning that premise, does he wanna work in a place where you might get fired because your boss SUSPECTS you may leave?
– Homerothompson
11 hours ago
1
I think the problem here is that OP is not just responding to "Are you leaving" but "Are you looking to leave" and wants to hide it. Saying "I've already mentioned [complaints] [...] If I eventually decide to leave" is essentially saying "I am looking to leave", or at least you're very close to it.
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
The fundamental problem here is that anything other than a complete and positive refutal, will be taken as "yes I am thinking of leaving".
Lying is wrong, and invariably comes back to haunt at a later stage - for example in this situation could lead to a rapid deterioration of trust during your notice period.
I think the best approach if faced with this situation, is to use a combination of humour and deflection. For example:
What kind of a question is that?!
...if said with the right tone, should lighten the atmosphere, hopefully remain ambiguous and so defuse the situation.
Ultimately though, I'd say it's better to avoid getting into this situation unintentionally, through wise behaviour and discretion.
The fundamental problem is similar to a quote from a novel I've read recently. "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes". +1
– Mindwin
10 hours ago
2
"Lying is wrong" - Citation needed, as well as the definition of a lie. I've long held the opinion that most every lie can be worded in such a way as to contain enough truth to make it not a lie. And as wonderful as it would be if everyone could tell the whole truth all the time, this exact scenario is the go-to example for many people of an acceptable time to lie.
– raumkrieger
3 hours ago
@raumkrieger I'd say it would be terrible if everyone answered every question with the whole truth, especially as long as there continue to be people who will abusively ask questions about things they have no right to full information about.
– Dronz
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Simple, you just need to look your boss in the face and say "No, why would I do that". Maintain eye contact the entire time.
This essentially puts your boss in a position where your boss has to either admit to doing things poorly or convince you as to why you should leave the company. If your boss is smart they'll leave it alone. If your boss isn't then you can just follow up pretty much any response to that question with, "Sounds like you really want me to leave".
Any boss who, "gets things out of people" should be handled in a polite and cut throat manner. They've earned it.
add a comment |
There is no good solution.
There is no answer that allows you to be honest and also keep your hand hidden. Either you're telling the truth or not. There's no middle ground here.
There's no version of this that plays out that makes you look good. If you lie, you destroy some of your professional reputation, but you get to leave on your terms.
If you tell the truth then you might be fired in advance or phased out in response, but you keep your professional reputation in one piece.
You COULD maybe find a middle ground. Having a meeting and making clear that you intend to leave in the foreseeable future and help the company find and train someone before your deadline.
I don't know the best answer, but it's clear from the break down of the question is that there is no GOOD solution. There's just varying degrees of discomfort.
My answer to "are you quitting"
No, but I'm not happy here and I can't see myself staying here much longer.
.. and then follow up with a list of things that are making you unhappy.
This is assuming you can be convinced to stay.
If you cannot be convinced to stay then:
Yes, but I'm not going to abandon you. I'd like to work with you on finding my replacement and even some training if they need it.
This is a fairly diplomatic and responsible answer.
My issue with lying to an employer, is they're paying to do work. But if you're there on a pretense of essentially running out the clock till it's time to go, that's... disingenuous.
Final note: We need to stop operating in bad faith. There are many managers out there who get it. Who get that we need to grow as professionals, not everyone is out to get you and maybe assuming good faith isn't such a bad approach. Maybe this manager is just trying to keep the ship on course and if that's the case, he can also be a really great ally in your transition or in getting new opportunities with a referral.
add a comment |
While other answers are helpful, I'd add that telling him outright that the line of questioning is not appropriate should stem the badgering/pursuit he is expected to do.
You may have to answer briefly first with a No or something evasive, and then follow with halting further questions. You still need to choose your own words in doing so, but choosing in advance may make you more comfortable going into that meeting. Highlighting that he should stop seems like something he won't be expecting or prepared for.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133467%2fhow-to-answer-pointed-are-you-quitting-questioning-when-i-dont-want-them-to-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function ()
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
var showEditor = function()
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
;
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True')
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup(
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup)
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
)
else
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
showEditor();
);
);
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
"Not unless I get a better offer!"
It is actually true. You're not leaving unless you get a better offer and until you hand in your notice. That is as true today as every other day.
You can say as much, and your boss will probably ask "Are you looking?" - but it's normal and acceptable for employees to keep an eye on the job market, and for recruiters to contact you (via LinkedIn or from an old CV, or any other method). You should do this anyway, to ensure you're being paid something close to the market average, and to track which skills are in demand.
He may ask whether you've been to an interview, which you can probably answer truthfully. Eventually he'll be asking "Would you leave if someone offered you more money and/or better conditions?" to which you could truthfully answer "well, duh!" ;-)
4
You make a good point. Fundamentally, employment is a mutual relationship of exchanging time and skills, for compensation. I'm as loyal as they come, just as long as you're paying me.
– Sobrique
12 hours ago
40
Agreed. "Are you quitting?" can honestly be responded to with a "No" up until the point at which OP puts in a notice. To elaborate, there is no deceit in this, because until there is a signed offer, presumably OP is not in fact quitting. "Are you looking?" can honestly be responded to with an "Of course I have my eyes open, just as everyone should! Those who don't are doing themselves a disservice."
– maxathousand
11 hours ago
16
Also, the correct answer to "Are you looking" is "I'm always looking".
– aleppke
10 hours ago
3
I've heard this phrase, and it may even be a choice on LinkedIn, I don't recall. "Happily employed but open to great opportunities."
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
2
@ShinEmperor Sure, but "Are you quitting?" is a different question than "Are you planning on quitting soon?" to which OP can still honestly say they have no plans to resign. Again, until there is another signed offer, it seems that OP's plans are to continue working for the current company. Finding a new job could take years.
– maxathousand
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
"Not unless I get a better offer!"
It is actually true. You're not leaving unless you get a better offer and until you hand in your notice. That is as true today as every other day.
You can say as much, and your boss will probably ask "Are you looking?" - but it's normal and acceptable for employees to keep an eye on the job market, and for recruiters to contact you (via LinkedIn or from an old CV, or any other method). You should do this anyway, to ensure you're being paid something close to the market average, and to track which skills are in demand.
He may ask whether you've been to an interview, which you can probably answer truthfully. Eventually he'll be asking "Would you leave if someone offered you more money and/or better conditions?" to which you could truthfully answer "well, duh!" ;-)
4
You make a good point. Fundamentally, employment is a mutual relationship of exchanging time and skills, for compensation. I'm as loyal as they come, just as long as you're paying me.
– Sobrique
12 hours ago
40
Agreed. "Are you quitting?" can honestly be responded to with a "No" up until the point at which OP puts in a notice. To elaborate, there is no deceit in this, because until there is a signed offer, presumably OP is not in fact quitting. "Are you looking?" can honestly be responded to with an "Of course I have my eyes open, just as everyone should! Those who don't are doing themselves a disservice."
– maxathousand
11 hours ago
16
Also, the correct answer to "Are you looking" is "I'm always looking".
– aleppke
10 hours ago
3
I've heard this phrase, and it may even be a choice on LinkedIn, I don't recall. "Happily employed but open to great opportunities."
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
2
@ShinEmperor Sure, but "Are you quitting?" is a different question than "Are you planning on quitting soon?" to which OP can still honestly say they have no plans to resign. Again, until there is another signed offer, it seems that OP's plans are to continue working for the current company. Finding a new job could take years.
– maxathousand
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
"Not unless I get a better offer!"
It is actually true. You're not leaving unless you get a better offer and until you hand in your notice. That is as true today as every other day.
You can say as much, and your boss will probably ask "Are you looking?" - but it's normal and acceptable for employees to keep an eye on the job market, and for recruiters to contact you (via LinkedIn or from an old CV, or any other method). You should do this anyway, to ensure you're being paid something close to the market average, and to track which skills are in demand.
He may ask whether you've been to an interview, which you can probably answer truthfully. Eventually he'll be asking "Would you leave if someone offered you more money and/or better conditions?" to which you could truthfully answer "well, duh!" ;-)
"Not unless I get a better offer!"
It is actually true. You're not leaving unless you get a better offer and until you hand in your notice. That is as true today as every other day.
You can say as much, and your boss will probably ask "Are you looking?" - but it's normal and acceptable for employees to keep an eye on the job market, and for recruiters to contact you (via LinkedIn or from an old CV, or any other method). You should do this anyway, to ensure you're being paid something close to the market average, and to track which skills are in demand.
He may ask whether you've been to an interview, which you can probably answer truthfully. Eventually he'll be asking "Would you leave if someone offered you more money and/or better conditions?" to which you could truthfully answer "well, duh!" ;-)
answered 12 hours ago
Robin BennettRobin Bennett
80126
80126
4
You make a good point. Fundamentally, employment is a mutual relationship of exchanging time and skills, for compensation. I'm as loyal as they come, just as long as you're paying me.
– Sobrique
12 hours ago
40
Agreed. "Are you quitting?" can honestly be responded to with a "No" up until the point at which OP puts in a notice. To elaborate, there is no deceit in this, because until there is a signed offer, presumably OP is not in fact quitting. "Are you looking?" can honestly be responded to with an "Of course I have my eyes open, just as everyone should! Those who don't are doing themselves a disservice."
– maxathousand
11 hours ago
16
Also, the correct answer to "Are you looking" is "I'm always looking".
– aleppke
10 hours ago
3
I've heard this phrase, and it may even be a choice on LinkedIn, I don't recall. "Happily employed but open to great opportunities."
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
2
@ShinEmperor Sure, but "Are you quitting?" is a different question than "Are you planning on quitting soon?" to which OP can still honestly say they have no plans to resign. Again, until there is another signed offer, it seems that OP's plans are to continue working for the current company. Finding a new job could take years.
– maxathousand
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
4
You make a good point. Fundamentally, employment is a mutual relationship of exchanging time and skills, for compensation. I'm as loyal as they come, just as long as you're paying me.
– Sobrique
12 hours ago
40
Agreed. "Are you quitting?" can honestly be responded to with a "No" up until the point at which OP puts in a notice. To elaborate, there is no deceit in this, because until there is a signed offer, presumably OP is not in fact quitting. "Are you looking?" can honestly be responded to with an "Of course I have my eyes open, just as everyone should! Those who don't are doing themselves a disservice."
– maxathousand
11 hours ago
16
Also, the correct answer to "Are you looking" is "I'm always looking".
– aleppke
10 hours ago
3
I've heard this phrase, and it may even be a choice on LinkedIn, I don't recall. "Happily employed but open to great opportunities."
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
2
@ShinEmperor Sure, but "Are you quitting?" is a different question than "Are you planning on quitting soon?" to which OP can still honestly say they have no plans to resign. Again, until there is another signed offer, it seems that OP's plans are to continue working for the current company. Finding a new job could take years.
– maxathousand
8 hours ago
4
4
You make a good point. Fundamentally, employment is a mutual relationship of exchanging time and skills, for compensation. I'm as loyal as they come, just as long as you're paying me.
– Sobrique
12 hours ago
You make a good point. Fundamentally, employment is a mutual relationship of exchanging time and skills, for compensation. I'm as loyal as they come, just as long as you're paying me.
– Sobrique
12 hours ago
40
40
Agreed. "Are you quitting?" can honestly be responded to with a "No" up until the point at which OP puts in a notice. To elaborate, there is no deceit in this, because until there is a signed offer, presumably OP is not in fact quitting. "Are you looking?" can honestly be responded to with an "Of course I have my eyes open, just as everyone should! Those who don't are doing themselves a disservice."
– maxathousand
11 hours ago
Agreed. "Are you quitting?" can honestly be responded to with a "No" up until the point at which OP puts in a notice. To elaborate, there is no deceit in this, because until there is a signed offer, presumably OP is not in fact quitting. "Are you looking?" can honestly be responded to with an "Of course I have my eyes open, just as everyone should! Those who don't are doing themselves a disservice."
– maxathousand
11 hours ago
16
16
Also, the correct answer to "Are you looking" is "I'm always looking".
– aleppke
10 hours ago
Also, the correct answer to "Are you looking" is "I'm always looking".
– aleppke
10 hours ago
3
3
I've heard this phrase, and it may even be a choice on LinkedIn, I don't recall. "Happily employed but open to great opportunities."
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
I've heard this phrase, and it may even be a choice on LinkedIn, I don't recall. "Happily employed but open to great opportunities."
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
2
2
@ShinEmperor Sure, but "Are you quitting?" is a different question than "Are you planning on quitting soon?" to which OP can still honestly say they have no plans to resign. Again, until there is another signed offer, it seems that OP's plans are to continue working for the current company. Finding a new job could take years.
– maxathousand
8 hours ago
@ShinEmperor Sure, but "Are you quitting?" is a different question than "Are you planning on quitting soon?" to which OP can still honestly say they have no plans to resign. Again, until there is another signed offer, it seems that OP's plans are to continue working for the current company. Finding a new job could take years.
– maxathousand
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
This question falls in the category “If you don’t want to hear lies, then don’t ask this question”. Your answer is “No”, or “No, what makes you think that”. You should give exactly the same answer as someone who doesn’t have the slightest desire to leave.
Why is it Ok to lie? Because the question shouldn’t have been asked. And because you need to lie to avoid having unjustified problems. It is entirely your right to tell your boss that you think about leaving the moment you give notice, and not one second earlier.
43
The problem with this is that OP isn't comfortable lying, and feels that the boss would spot it straight away. In that situation, a poor lie is effectively both admitting the truth and insulting the boss by lying.
– Robin Bennett
12 hours ago
3
-1 OP is not asking whether it is moral to lie, but how to actually do it, "technically".
– AnoE
10 hours ago
8
Then don't make it a lie. You wouldn't consider leaving before accepting another offer, right? So until that happens, saying you aren't considering leaving is absolutely the truth right up until the moment you are ready to hand in your resignation.
– Seth R
9 hours ago
3
Lying is wrong whether or not anyone else plays by the rules. What if OP responds as you suggest and then the next day or next week accepts a job and puts in his notice? It's going to be clear that he's been lying which diminishes his reputation.
– JeffC
7 hours ago
2
@JeffC OP would not really be lying. You are not officially leaving until you put in your notice. So if OP has not put in notice, he/she can answer no with a clear conscience
– Joker28322
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
This question falls in the category “If you don’t want to hear lies, then don’t ask this question”. Your answer is “No”, or “No, what makes you think that”. You should give exactly the same answer as someone who doesn’t have the slightest desire to leave.
Why is it Ok to lie? Because the question shouldn’t have been asked. And because you need to lie to avoid having unjustified problems. It is entirely your right to tell your boss that you think about leaving the moment you give notice, and not one second earlier.
43
The problem with this is that OP isn't comfortable lying, and feels that the boss would spot it straight away. In that situation, a poor lie is effectively both admitting the truth and insulting the boss by lying.
– Robin Bennett
12 hours ago
3
-1 OP is not asking whether it is moral to lie, but how to actually do it, "technically".
– AnoE
10 hours ago
8
Then don't make it a lie. You wouldn't consider leaving before accepting another offer, right? So until that happens, saying you aren't considering leaving is absolutely the truth right up until the moment you are ready to hand in your resignation.
– Seth R
9 hours ago
3
Lying is wrong whether or not anyone else plays by the rules. What if OP responds as you suggest and then the next day or next week accepts a job and puts in his notice? It's going to be clear that he's been lying which diminishes his reputation.
– JeffC
7 hours ago
2
@JeffC OP would not really be lying. You are not officially leaving until you put in your notice. So if OP has not put in notice, he/she can answer no with a clear conscience
– Joker28322
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
This question falls in the category “If you don’t want to hear lies, then don’t ask this question”. Your answer is “No”, or “No, what makes you think that”. You should give exactly the same answer as someone who doesn’t have the slightest desire to leave.
Why is it Ok to lie? Because the question shouldn’t have been asked. And because you need to lie to avoid having unjustified problems. It is entirely your right to tell your boss that you think about leaving the moment you give notice, and not one second earlier.
This question falls in the category “If you don’t want to hear lies, then don’t ask this question”. Your answer is “No”, or “No, what makes you think that”. You should give exactly the same answer as someone who doesn’t have the slightest desire to leave.
Why is it Ok to lie? Because the question shouldn’t have been asked. And because you need to lie to avoid having unjustified problems. It is entirely your right to tell your boss that you think about leaving the moment you give notice, and not one second earlier.
answered 13 hours ago
gnasher729gnasher729
91.1k41162286
91.1k41162286
43
The problem with this is that OP isn't comfortable lying, and feels that the boss would spot it straight away. In that situation, a poor lie is effectively both admitting the truth and insulting the boss by lying.
– Robin Bennett
12 hours ago
3
-1 OP is not asking whether it is moral to lie, but how to actually do it, "technically".
– AnoE
10 hours ago
8
Then don't make it a lie. You wouldn't consider leaving before accepting another offer, right? So until that happens, saying you aren't considering leaving is absolutely the truth right up until the moment you are ready to hand in your resignation.
– Seth R
9 hours ago
3
Lying is wrong whether or not anyone else plays by the rules. What if OP responds as you suggest and then the next day or next week accepts a job and puts in his notice? It's going to be clear that he's been lying which diminishes his reputation.
– JeffC
7 hours ago
2
@JeffC OP would not really be lying. You are not officially leaving until you put in your notice. So if OP has not put in notice, he/she can answer no with a clear conscience
– Joker28322
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
43
The problem with this is that OP isn't comfortable lying, and feels that the boss would spot it straight away. In that situation, a poor lie is effectively both admitting the truth and insulting the boss by lying.
– Robin Bennett
12 hours ago
3
-1 OP is not asking whether it is moral to lie, but how to actually do it, "technically".
– AnoE
10 hours ago
8
Then don't make it a lie. You wouldn't consider leaving before accepting another offer, right? So until that happens, saying you aren't considering leaving is absolutely the truth right up until the moment you are ready to hand in your resignation.
– Seth R
9 hours ago
3
Lying is wrong whether or not anyone else plays by the rules. What if OP responds as you suggest and then the next day or next week accepts a job and puts in his notice? It's going to be clear that he's been lying which diminishes his reputation.
– JeffC
7 hours ago
2
@JeffC OP would not really be lying. You are not officially leaving until you put in your notice. So if OP has not put in notice, he/she can answer no with a clear conscience
– Joker28322
2 hours ago
43
43
The problem with this is that OP isn't comfortable lying, and feels that the boss would spot it straight away. In that situation, a poor lie is effectively both admitting the truth and insulting the boss by lying.
– Robin Bennett
12 hours ago
The problem with this is that OP isn't comfortable lying, and feels that the boss would spot it straight away. In that situation, a poor lie is effectively both admitting the truth and insulting the boss by lying.
– Robin Bennett
12 hours ago
3
3
-1 OP is not asking whether it is moral to lie, but how to actually do it, "technically".
– AnoE
10 hours ago
-1 OP is not asking whether it is moral to lie, but how to actually do it, "technically".
– AnoE
10 hours ago
8
8
Then don't make it a lie. You wouldn't consider leaving before accepting another offer, right? So until that happens, saying you aren't considering leaving is absolutely the truth right up until the moment you are ready to hand in your resignation.
– Seth R
9 hours ago
Then don't make it a lie. You wouldn't consider leaving before accepting another offer, right? So until that happens, saying you aren't considering leaving is absolutely the truth right up until the moment you are ready to hand in your resignation.
– Seth R
9 hours ago
3
3
Lying is wrong whether or not anyone else plays by the rules. What if OP responds as you suggest and then the next day or next week accepts a job and puts in his notice? It's going to be clear that he's been lying which diminishes his reputation.
– JeffC
7 hours ago
Lying is wrong whether or not anyone else plays by the rules. What if OP responds as you suggest and then the next day or next week accepts a job and puts in his notice? It's going to be clear that he's been lying which diminishes his reputation.
– JeffC
7 hours ago
2
2
@JeffC OP would not really be lying. You are not officially leaving until you put in your notice. So if OP has not put in notice, he/she can answer no with a clear conscience
– Joker28322
2 hours ago
@JeffC OP would not really be lying. You are not officially leaving until you put in your notice. So if OP has not put in notice, he/she can answer no with a clear conscience
– Joker28322
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
I've been in this situation before, and honestly I regretted caving in and telling them. If I had to do it again, I would rather flat-out lie than tell the truth; as unprofessional as it may be to lie, it's also unprofessional for them to put you in that position. Regardless, here are two ways you can get around this without barefaced lies.
With jokes
In an informal conversation, if you want to avoid outright lying, you can use humour to imply things without actually saying them.
Something like "Actually I feel quite tied to this place. If only because no one will pass me the scissors to cut the rope" might work.
Or you might be a little daring and liken it to a relationship with a jealous lover: " I thought you trusted me, . If you cant trust me, maybe we should see other people". The added metaphorical ballsiness of this joke might work even further in your favour, but definitely make sure that you know this will be taken as a joke before trying!
It catches your boss off-guard, makes the conversation feel a little less like an interrogation, and it implies that you want to stay. Remember, it's not a lie if you're telling a joke. Humour can let you get away with all sorts.
With deflection
If it's more formal, to the point where you can't appropriately work in the humour aspect but still don't want to bald-face lie, talk about the things you like about this place but don't word it in a way that makes it obvious that you are deflecting.
An example might be: "You know, I'm actually okay, I mean the people are nice and the perks are useful". All of those things might be true, but none of them mean that you are or aren't looking elsewhere. "I'm okay" is not "I'm staying".
I appreciate this will all feel like mental gymnastics at this point, but it's your best shield against this type of boss.
3
A joke can be the literal truth. "Well, I'm not likely to be working here for ever" is as good a response as any.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
In the joke category: why, do you want to get rid of me?
– Bernhard
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I've been in this situation before, and honestly I regretted caving in and telling them. If I had to do it again, I would rather flat-out lie than tell the truth; as unprofessional as it may be to lie, it's also unprofessional for them to put you in that position. Regardless, here are two ways you can get around this without barefaced lies.
With jokes
In an informal conversation, if you want to avoid outright lying, you can use humour to imply things without actually saying them.
Something like "Actually I feel quite tied to this place. If only because no one will pass me the scissors to cut the rope" might work.
Or you might be a little daring and liken it to a relationship with a jealous lover: " I thought you trusted me, . If you cant trust me, maybe we should see other people". The added metaphorical ballsiness of this joke might work even further in your favour, but definitely make sure that you know this will be taken as a joke before trying!
It catches your boss off-guard, makes the conversation feel a little less like an interrogation, and it implies that you want to stay. Remember, it's not a lie if you're telling a joke. Humour can let you get away with all sorts.
With deflection
If it's more formal, to the point where you can't appropriately work in the humour aspect but still don't want to bald-face lie, talk about the things you like about this place but don't word it in a way that makes it obvious that you are deflecting.
An example might be: "You know, I'm actually okay, I mean the people are nice and the perks are useful". All of those things might be true, but none of them mean that you are or aren't looking elsewhere. "I'm okay" is not "I'm staying".
I appreciate this will all feel like mental gymnastics at this point, but it's your best shield against this type of boss.
3
A joke can be the literal truth. "Well, I'm not likely to be working here for ever" is as good a response as any.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
In the joke category: why, do you want to get rid of me?
– Bernhard
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I've been in this situation before, and honestly I regretted caving in and telling them. If I had to do it again, I would rather flat-out lie than tell the truth; as unprofessional as it may be to lie, it's also unprofessional for them to put you in that position. Regardless, here are two ways you can get around this without barefaced lies.
With jokes
In an informal conversation, if you want to avoid outright lying, you can use humour to imply things without actually saying them.
Something like "Actually I feel quite tied to this place. If only because no one will pass me the scissors to cut the rope" might work.
Or you might be a little daring and liken it to a relationship with a jealous lover: " I thought you trusted me, . If you cant trust me, maybe we should see other people". The added metaphorical ballsiness of this joke might work even further in your favour, but definitely make sure that you know this will be taken as a joke before trying!
It catches your boss off-guard, makes the conversation feel a little less like an interrogation, and it implies that you want to stay. Remember, it's not a lie if you're telling a joke. Humour can let you get away with all sorts.
With deflection
If it's more formal, to the point where you can't appropriately work in the humour aspect but still don't want to bald-face lie, talk about the things you like about this place but don't word it in a way that makes it obvious that you are deflecting.
An example might be: "You know, I'm actually okay, I mean the people are nice and the perks are useful". All of those things might be true, but none of them mean that you are or aren't looking elsewhere. "I'm okay" is not "I'm staying".
I appreciate this will all feel like mental gymnastics at this point, but it's your best shield against this type of boss.
I've been in this situation before, and honestly I regretted caving in and telling them. If I had to do it again, I would rather flat-out lie than tell the truth; as unprofessional as it may be to lie, it's also unprofessional for them to put you in that position. Regardless, here are two ways you can get around this without barefaced lies.
With jokes
In an informal conversation, if you want to avoid outright lying, you can use humour to imply things without actually saying them.
Something like "Actually I feel quite tied to this place. If only because no one will pass me the scissors to cut the rope" might work.
Or you might be a little daring and liken it to a relationship with a jealous lover: " I thought you trusted me, . If you cant trust me, maybe we should see other people". The added metaphorical ballsiness of this joke might work even further in your favour, but definitely make sure that you know this will be taken as a joke before trying!
It catches your boss off-guard, makes the conversation feel a little less like an interrogation, and it implies that you want to stay. Remember, it's not a lie if you're telling a joke. Humour can let you get away with all sorts.
With deflection
If it's more formal, to the point where you can't appropriately work in the humour aspect but still don't want to bald-face lie, talk about the things you like about this place but don't word it in a way that makes it obvious that you are deflecting.
An example might be: "You know, I'm actually okay, I mean the people are nice and the perks are useful". All of those things might be true, but none of them mean that you are or aren't looking elsewhere. "I'm okay" is not "I'm staying".
I appreciate this will all feel like mental gymnastics at this point, but it's your best shield against this type of boss.
edited 13 hours ago
answered 14 hours ago
520520
4,958726
4,958726
3
A joke can be the literal truth. "Well, I'm not likely to be working here for ever" is as good a response as any.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
In the joke category: why, do you want to get rid of me?
– Bernhard
4 hours ago
add a comment |
3
A joke can be the literal truth. "Well, I'm not likely to be working here for ever" is as good a response as any.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
In the joke category: why, do you want to get rid of me?
– Bernhard
4 hours ago
3
3
A joke can be the literal truth. "Well, I'm not likely to be working here for ever" is as good a response as any.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
A joke can be the literal truth. "Well, I'm not likely to be working here for ever" is as good a response as any.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
In the joke category: why, do you want to get rid of me?
– Bernhard
4 hours ago
In the joke category: why, do you want to get rid of me?
– Bernhard
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I've been in a very similar situation in the past with a manager who seemed to have no boundaries. I'm also not a great liar. I was asked if I was intending to leave, to which I responded:
I'm not actively looking for a new job.
The word actively was key to me being able to say this truthfully.
When pressed further by my manager, asking whether I'd take another job if it were offered, I said:
I'm sure you'd agree that I'd be foolish to sabotage my career by passing up a great opportunity. I don't have anything on the table at the moment, but you would be the first to know if I decide to pursue a job elsewhere.
If you're presented with more questions around this, from different angles, repeat the same thing with different words, using phrases such as:
I'm not interviewing at the moment
I don't plan to leave
I don't have any plans right now
I would let you know immediately if anything changes
It can also be really useful when somebody is trying to pry information from you to prefix your response with:
Like I said...
This indicates that you're not going to be browbeaten into saying something you don't want to.
I suppose this does fall under the umbrella of being evasive, but it avoids lying outright, which can be easier to pull off. I'm aware that it's similar to the current top rated answer, but thought some other phrases could be useful.
New contributor
Arronical is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I've been in a very similar situation in the past with a manager who seemed to have no boundaries. I'm also not a great liar. I was asked if I was intending to leave, to which I responded:
I'm not actively looking for a new job.
The word actively was key to me being able to say this truthfully.
When pressed further by my manager, asking whether I'd take another job if it were offered, I said:
I'm sure you'd agree that I'd be foolish to sabotage my career by passing up a great opportunity. I don't have anything on the table at the moment, but you would be the first to know if I decide to pursue a job elsewhere.
If you're presented with more questions around this, from different angles, repeat the same thing with different words, using phrases such as:
I'm not interviewing at the moment
I don't plan to leave
I don't have any plans right now
I would let you know immediately if anything changes
It can also be really useful when somebody is trying to pry information from you to prefix your response with:
Like I said...
This indicates that you're not going to be browbeaten into saying something you don't want to.
I suppose this does fall under the umbrella of being evasive, but it avoids lying outright, which can be easier to pull off. I'm aware that it's similar to the current top rated answer, but thought some other phrases could be useful.
New contributor
Arronical is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I've been in a very similar situation in the past with a manager who seemed to have no boundaries. I'm also not a great liar. I was asked if I was intending to leave, to which I responded:
I'm not actively looking for a new job.
The word actively was key to me being able to say this truthfully.
When pressed further by my manager, asking whether I'd take another job if it were offered, I said:
I'm sure you'd agree that I'd be foolish to sabotage my career by passing up a great opportunity. I don't have anything on the table at the moment, but you would be the first to know if I decide to pursue a job elsewhere.
If you're presented with more questions around this, from different angles, repeat the same thing with different words, using phrases such as:
I'm not interviewing at the moment
I don't plan to leave
I don't have any plans right now
I would let you know immediately if anything changes
It can also be really useful when somebody is trying to pry information from you to prefix your response with:
Like I said...
This indicates that you're not going to be browbeaten into saying something you don't want to.
I suppose this does fall under the umbrella of being evasive, but it avoids lying outright, which can be easier to pull off. I'm aware that it's similar to the current top rated answer, but thought some other phrases could be useful.
New contributor
Arronical is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I've been in a very similar situation in the past with a manager who seemed to have no boundaries. I'm also not a great liar. I was asked if I was intending to leave, to which I responded:
I'm not actively looking for a new job.
The word actively was key to me being able to say this truthfully.
When pressed further by my manager, asking whether I'd take another job if it were offered, I said:
I'm sure you'd agree that I'd be foolish to sabotage my career by passing up a great opportunity. I don't have anything on the table at the moment, but you would be the first to know if I decide to pursue a job elsewhere.
If you're presented with more questions around this, from different angles, repeat the same thing with different words, using phrases such as:
I'm not interviewing at the moment
I don't plan to leave
I don't have any plans right now
I would let you know immediately if anything changes
It can also be really useful when somebody is trying to pry information from you to prefix your response with:
Like I said...
This indicates that you're not going to be browbeaten into saying something you don't want to.
I suppose this does fall under the umbrella of being evasive, but it avoids lying outright, which can be easier to pull off. I'm aware that it's similar to the current top rated answer, but thought some other phrases could be useful.
New contributor
Arronical is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 8 hours ago
New contributor
Arronical is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 9 hours ago
ArronicalArronical
2915
2915
New contributor
Arronical is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Arronical is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Arronical is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
he's trying to catch as much warning of unhappiness graduating to active job search as he can.
Isn't this a good thing? You don't mention what you think he will do if he figures it out. You also didn't mention if you've given him the chance to understand why you're unhappy and are working on leaving.
Unless you're expecting to be fired on the spot (I presume you're American) what would the harm be in simply engaging him on his suspicion and saying: "Good of you to notice my unhappiness, here's what I'm unhappy about"? By focusing on that instead of your actual plans to leave, you can give him insight into what he could improve.
Your conclusion that people seem to advise to say nothing may be missing the point. There is no (or shouldn't be) any harm in giving your boss a chance before moving on. Once you've given them a chance and they don't listen, sure. But if you've mentioned your discontent before then I don't see why your boss would be 'cornering' you to get you to tell him why you're unhappy.
New contributor
Simmetric is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
I'd argue it's almost definitely not a good thing due to the specific phrasing. Boss isn't trying to catch warning of unhappiness, boss is trying to catch warning of unhappiness turning to job search. Which pretty heavily implies boss knows of unhappiness. And a boss trying to "catch" employees looking to leave rather than helping dampen the unhappiness isn't a boss I want to work for.
– Delioth
10 hours ago
add a comment |
he's trying to catch as much warning of unhappiness graduating to active job search as he can.
Isn't this a good thing? You don't mention what you think he will do if he figures it out. You also didn't mention if you've given him the chance to understand why you're unhappy and are working on leaving.
Unless you're expecting to be fired on the spot (I presume you're American) what would the harm be in simply engaging him on his suspicion and saying: "Good of you to notice my unhappiness, here's what I'm unhappy about"? By focusing on that instead of your actual plans to leave, you can give him insight into what he could improve.
Your conclusion that people seem to advise to say nothing may be missing the point. There is no (or shouldn't be) any harm in giving your boss a chance before moving on. Once you've given them a chance and they don't listen, sure. But if you've mentioned your discontent before then I don't see why your boss would be 'cornering' you to get you to tell him why you're unhappy.
New contributor
Simmetric is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
I'd argue it's almost definitely not a good thing due to the specific phrasing. Boss isn't trying to catch warning of unhappiness, boss is trying to catch warning of unhappiness turning to job search. Which pretty heavily implies boss knows of unhappiness. And a boss trying to "catch" employees looking to leave rather than helping dampen the unhappiness isn't a boss I want to work for.
– Delioth
10 hours ago
add a comment |
he's trying to catch as much warning of unhappiness graduating to active job search as he can.
Isn't this a good thing? You don't mention what you think he will do if he figures it out. You also didn't mention if you've given him the chance to understand why you're unhappy and are working on leaving.
Unless you're expecting to be fired on the spot (I presume you're American) what would the harm be in simply engaging him on his suspicion and saying: "Good of you to notice my unhappiness, here's what I'm unhappy about"? By focusing on that instead of your actual plans to leave, you can give him insight into what he could improve.
Your conclusion that people seem to advise to say nothing may be missing the point. There is no (or shouldn't be) any harm in giving your boss a chance before moving on. Once you've given them a chance and they don't listen, sure. But if you've mentioned your discontent before then I don't see why your boss would be 'cornering' you to get you to tell him why you're unhappy.
New contributor
Simmetric is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
he's trying to catch as much warning of unhappiness graduating to active job search as he can.
Isn't this a good thing? You don't mention what you think he will do if he figures it out. You also didn't mention if you've given him the chance to understand why you're unhappy and are working on leaving.
Unless you're expecting to be fired on the spot (I presume you're American) what would the harm be in simply engaging him on his suspicion and saying: "Good of you to notice my unhappiness, here's what I'm unhappy about"? By focusing on that instead of your actual plans to leave, you can give him insight into what he could improve.
Your conclusion that people seem to advise to say nothing may be missing the point. There is no (or shouldn't be) any harm in giving your boss a chance before moving on. Once you've given them a chance and they don't listen, sure. But if you've mentioned your discontent before then I don't see why your boss would be 'cornering' you to get you to tell him why you're unhappy.
New contributor
Simmetric is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Simmetric is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 12 hours ago
SimmetricSimmetric
1591
1591
New contributor
Simmetric is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Simmetric is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Simmetric is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
I'd argue it's almost definitely not a good thing due to the specific phrasing. Boss isn't trying to catch warning of unhappiness, boss is trying to catch warning of unhappiness turning to job search. Which pretty heavily implies boss knows of unhappiness. And a boss trying to "catch" employees looking to leave rather than helping dampen the unhappiness isn't a boss I want to work for.
– Delioth
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3
I'd argue it's almost definitely not a good thing due to the specific phrasing. Boss isn't trying to catch warning of unhappiness, boss is trying to catch warning of unhappiness turning to job search. Which pretty heavily implies boss knows of unhappiness. And a boss trying to "catch" employees looking to leave rather than helping dampen the unhappiness isn't a boss I want to work for.
– Delioth
10 hours ago
3
3
I'd argue it's almost definitely not a good thing due to the specific phrasing. Boss isn't trying to catch warning of unhappiness, boss is trying to catch warning of unhappiness turning to job search. Which pretty heavily implies boss knows of unhappiness. And a boss trying to "catch" employees looking to leave rather than helping dampen the unhappiness isn't a boss I want to work for.
– Delioth
10 hours ago
I'd argue it's almost definitely not a good thing due to the specific phrasing. Boss isn't trying to catch warning of unhappiness, boss is trying to catch warning of unhappiness turning to job search. Which pretty heavily implies boss knows of unhappiness. And a boss trying to "catch" employees looking to leave rather than helping dampen the unhappiness isn't a boss I want to work for.
– Delioth
10 hours ago
add a comment |
You can be as forward as him without lying:
If he ask you if you are unhappy and why you can get into detail about this, this is regular stuff so far.
When it comes to:
Are you considering leaving the company?
Just answer:
Sorry but I'm not willing to talk about that, I've already mention what are the things that bother me and can be improved, we should focus on that. If eventually decide to leave I'll let you know in the notice period agreed in our work contract.
12
If I was your boss and you said that I would know you had one for out the door.
– bruglesco
13 hours ago
@bruglesco I agree completely with your comment.
– JustSaying
13 hours ago
3
I don't read any of these comments as promoting lying. Just saying that this answer is a little too elaborate to be dismissed as something other than deflection, and that ends up implying the very thing OP is trying to avoid admitting. Even moreso if, as you suggest, the boss already suspects OP might be leaving.
– Steve-O
12 hours ago
1
The most voted answer is to lie because the question shouldn't be asked. If someone ask you something he/she shouldn't ask that gives you the right to lie? no! you refuse to answer. I know op don't want tthem to suspect, I'm just questioning that premise, does he wanna work in a place where you might get fired because your boss SUSPECTS you may leave?
– Homerothompson
11 hours ago
1
I think the problem here is that OP is not just responding to "Are you leaving" but "Are you looking to leave" and wants to hide it. Saying "I've already mentioned [complaints] [...] If I eventually decide to leave" is essentially saying "I am looking to leave", or at least you're very close to it.
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
You can be as forward as him without lying:
If he ask you if you are unhappy and why you can get into detail about this, this is regular stuff so far.
When it comes to:
Are you considering leaving the company?
Just answer:
Sorry but I'm not willing to talk about that, I've already mention what are the things that bother me and can be improved, we should focus on that. If eventually decide to leave I'll let you know in the notice period agreed in our work contract.
12
If I was your boss and you said that I would know you had one for out the door.
– bruglesco
13 hours ago
@bruglesco I agree completely with your comment.
– JustSaying
13 hours ago
3
I don't read any of these comments as promoting lying. Just saying that this answer is a little too elaborate to be dismissed as something other than deflection, and that ends up implying the very thing OP is trying to avoid admitting. Even moreso if, as you suggest, the boss already suspects OP might be leaving.
– Steve-O
12 hours ago
1
The most voted answer is to lie because the question shouldn't be asked. If someone ask you something he/she shouldn't ask that gives you the right to lie? no! you refuse to answer. I know op don't want tthem to suspect, I'm just questioning that premise, does he wanna work in a place where you might get fired because your boss SUSPECTS you may leave?
– Homerothompson
11 hours ago
1
I think the problem here is that OP is not just responding to "Are you leaving" but "Are you looking to leave" and wants to hide it. Saying "I've already mentioned [complaints] [...] If I eventually decide to leave" is essentially saying "I am looking to leave", or at least you're very close to it.
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
You can be as forward as him without lying:
If he ask you if you are unhappy and why you can get into detail about this, this is regular stuff so far.
When it comes to:
Are you considering leaving the company?
Just answer:
Sorry but I'm not willing to talk about that, I've already mention what are the things that bother me and can be improved, we should focus on that. If eventually decide to leave I'll let you know in the notice period agreed in our work contract.
You can be as forward as him without lying:
If he ask you if you are unhappy and why you can get into detail about this, this is regular stuff so far.
When it comes to:
Are you considering leaving the company?
Just answer:
Sorry but I'm not willing to talk about that, I've already mention what are the things that bother me and can be improved, we should focus on that. If eventually decide to leave I'll let you know in the notice period agreed in our work contract.
answered 14 hours ago
HomerothompsonHomerothompson
2,570723
2,570723
12
If I was your boss and you said that I would know you had one for out the door.
– bruglesco
13 hours ago
@bruglesco I agree completely with your comment.
– JustSaying
13 hours ago
3
I don't read any of these comments as promoting lying. Just saying that this answer is a little too elaborate to be dismissed as something other than deflection, and that ends up implying the very thing OP is trying to avoid admitting. Even moreso if, as you suggest, the boss already suspects OP might be leaving.
– Steve-O
12 hours ago
1
The most voted answer is to lie because the question shouldn't be asked. If someone ask you something he/she shouldn't ask that gives you the right to lie? no! you refuse to answer. I know op don't want tthem to suspect, I'm just questioning that premise, does he wanna work in a place where you might get fired because your boss SUSPECTS you may leave?
– Homerothompson
11 hours ago
1
I think the problem here is that OP is not just responding to "Are you leaving" but "Are you looking to leave" and wants to hide it. Saying "I've already mentioned [complaints] [...] If I eventually decide to leave" is essentially saying "I am looking to leave", or at least you're very close to it.
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
12
If I was your boss and you said that I would know you had one for out the door.
– bruglesco
13 hours ago
@bruglesco I agree completely with your comment.
– JustSaying
13 hours ago
3
I don't read any of these comments as promoting lying. Just saying that this answer is a little too elaborate to be dismissed as something other than deflection, and that ends up implying the very thing OP is trying to avoid admitting. Even moreso if, as you suggest, the boss already suspects OP might be leaving.
– Steve-O
12 hours ago
1
The most voted answer is to lie because the question shouldn't be asked. If someone ask you something he/she shouldn't ask that gives you the right to lie? no! you refuse to answer. I know op don't want tthem to suspect, I'm just questioning that premise, does he wanna work in a place where you might get fired because your boss SUSPECTS you may leave?
– Homerothompson
11 hours ago
1
I think the problem here is that OP is not just responding to "Are you leaving" but "Are you looking to leave" and wants to hide it. Saying "I've already mentioned [complaints] [...] If I eventually decide to leave" is essentially saying "I am looking to leave", or at least you're very close to it.
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
12
12
If I was your boss and you said that I would know you had one for out the door.
– bruglesco
13 hours ago
If I was your boss and you said that I would know you had one for out the door.
– bruglesco
13 hours ago
@bruglesco I agree completely with your comment.
– JustSaying
13 hours ago
@bruglesco I agree completely with your comment.
– JustSaying
13 hours ago
3
3
I don't read any of these comments as promoting lying. Just saying that this answer is a little too elaborate to be dismissed as something other than deflection, and that ends up implying the very thing OP is trying to avoid admitting. Even moreso if, as you suggest, the boss already suspects OP might be leaving.
– Steve-O
12 hours ago
I don't read any of these comments as promoting lying. Just saying that this answer is a little too elaborate to be dismissed as something other than deflection, and that ends up implying the very thing OP is trying to avoid admitting. Even moreso if, as you suggest, the boss already suspects OP might be leaving.
– Steve-O
12 hours ago
1
1
The most voted answer is to lie because the question shouldn't be asked. If someone ask you something he/she shouldn't ask that gives you the right to lie? no! you refuse to answer. I know op don't want tthem to suspect, I'm just questioning that premise, does he wanna work in a place where you might get fired because your boss SUSPECTS you may leave?
– Homerothompson
11 hours ago
The most voted answer is to lie because the question shouldn't be asked. If someone ask you something he/she shouldn't ask that gives you the right to lie? no! you refuse to answer. I know op don't want tthem to suspect, I'm just questioning that premise, does he wanna work in a place where you might get fired because your boss SUSPECTS you may leave?
– Homerothompson
11 hours ago
1
1
I think the problem here is that OP is not just responding to "Are you leaving" but "Are you looking to leave" and wants to hide it. Saying "I've already mentioned [complaints] [...] If I eventually decide to leave" is essentially saying "I am looking to leave", or at least you're very close to it.
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
I think the problem here is that OP is not just responding to "Are you leaving" but "Are you looking to leave" and wants to hide it. Saying "I've already mentioned [complaints] [...] If I eventually decide to leave" is essentially saying "I am looking to leave", or at least you're very close to it.
– Captain Man
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
The fundamental problem here is that anything other than a complete and positive refutal, will be taken as "yes I am thinking of leaving".
Lying is wrong, and invariably comes back to haunt at a later stage - for example in this situation could lead to a rapid deterioration of trust during your notice period.
I think the best approach if faced with this situation, is to use a combination of humour and deflection. For example:
What kind of a question is that?!
...if said with the right tone, should lighten the atmosphere, hopefully remain ambiguous and so defuse the situation.
Ultimately though, I'd say it's better to avoid getting into this situation unintentionally, through wise behaviour and discretion.
The fundamental problem is similar to a quote from a novel I've read recently. "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes". +1
– Mindwin
10 hours ago
2
"Lying is wrong" - Citation needed, as well as the definition of a lie. I've long held the opinion that most every lie can be worded in such a way as to contain enough truth to make it not a lie. And as wonderful as it would be if everyone could tell the whole truth all the time, this exact scenario is the go-to example for many people of an acceptable time to lie.
– raumkrieger
3 hours ago
@raumkrieger I'd say it would be terrible if everyone answered every question with the whole truth, especially as long as there continue to be people who will abusively ask questions about things they have no right to full information about.
– Dronz
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The fundamental problem here is that anything other than a complete and positive refutal, will be taken as "yes I am thinking of leaving".
Lying is wrong, and invariably comes back to haunt at a later stage - for example in this situation could lead to a rapid deterioration of trust during your notice period.
I think the best approach if faced with this situation, is to use a combination of humour and deflection. For example:
What kind of a question is that?!
...if said with the right tone, should lighten the atmosphere, hopefully remain ambiguous and so defuse the situation.
Ultimately though, I'd say it's better to avoid getting into this situation unintentionally, through wise behaviour and discretion.
The fundamental problem is similar to a quote from a novel I've read recently. "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes". +1
– Mindwin
10 hours ago
2
"Lying is wrong" - Citation needed, as well as the definition of a lie. I've long held the opinion that most every lie can be worded in such a way as to contain enough truth to make it not a lie. And as wonderful as it would be if everyone could tell the whole truth all the time, this exact scenario is the go-to example for many people of an acceptable time to lie.
– raumkrieger
3 hours ago
@raumkrieger I'd say it would be terrible if everyone answered every question with the whole truth, especially as long as there continue to be people who will abusively ask questions about things they have no right to full information about.
– Dronz
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The fundamental problem here is that anything other than a complete and positive refutal, will be taken as "yes I am thinking of leaving".
Lying is wrong, and invariably comes back to haunt at a later stage - for example in this situation could lead to a rapid deterioration of trust during your notice period.
I think the best approach if faced with this situation, is to use a combination of humour and deflection. For example:
What kind of a question is that?!
...if said with the right tone, should lighten the atmosphere, hopefully remain ambiguous and so defuse the situation.
Ultimately though, I'd say it's better to avoid getting into this situation unintentionally, through wise behaviour and discretion.
The fundamental problem here is that anything other than a complete and positive refutal, will be taken as "yes I am thinking of leaving".
Lying is wrong, and invariably comes back to haunt at a later stage - for example in this situation could lead to a rapid deterioration of trust during your notice period.
I think the best approach if faced with this situation, is to use a combination of humour and deflection. For example:
What kind of a question is that?!
...if said with the right tone, should lighten the atmosphere, hopefully remain ambiguous and so defuse the situation.
Ultimately though, I'd say it's better to avoid getting into this situation unintentionally, through wise behaviour and discretion.
answered 13 hours ago
Andrew EblingAndrew Ebling
62846
62846
The fundamental problem is similar to a quote from a novel I've read recently. "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes". +1
– Mindwin
10 hours ago
2
"Lying is wrong" - Citation needed, as well as the definition of a lie. I've long held the opinion that most every lie can be worded in such a way as to contain enough truth to make it not a lie. And as wonderful as it would be if everyone could tell the whole truth all the time, this exact scenario is the go-to example for many people of an acceptable time to lie.
– raumkrieger
3 hours ago
@raumkrieger I'd say it would be terrible if everyone answered every question with the whole truth, especially as long as there continue to be people who will abusively ask questions about things they have no right to full information about.
– Dronz
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The fundamental problem is similar to a quote from a novel I've read recently. "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes". +1
– Mindwin
10 hours ago
2
"Lying is wrong" - Citation needed, as well as the definition of a lie. I've long held the opinion that most every lie can be worded in such a way as to contain enough truth to make it not a lie. And as wonderful as it would be if everyone could tell the whole truth all the time, this exact scenario is the go-to example for many people of an acceptable time to lie.
– raumkrieger
3 hours ago
@raumkrieger I'd say it would be terrible if everyone answered every question with the whole truth, especially as long as there continue to be people who will abusively ask questions about things they have no right to full information about.
– Dronz
2 hours ago
The fundamental problem is similar to a quote from a novel I've read recently. "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes". +1
– Mindwin
10 hours ago
The fundamental problem is similar to a quote from a novel I've read recently. "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes". +1
– Mindwin
10 hours ago
2
2
"Lying is wrong" - Citation needed, as well as the definition of a lie. I've long held the opinion that most every lie can be worded in such a way as to contain enough truth to make it not a lie. And as wonderful as it would be if everyone could tell the whole truth all the time, this exact scenario is the go-to example for many people of an acceptable time to lie.
– raumkrieger
3 hours ago
"Lying is wrong" - Citation needed, as well as the definition of a lie. I've long held the opinion that most every lie can be worded in such a way as to contain enough truth to make it not a lie. And as wonderful as it would be if everyone could tell the whole truth all the time, this exact scenario is the go-to example for many people of an acceptable time to lie.
– raumkrieger
3 hours ago
@raumkrieger I'd say it would be terrible if everyone answered every question with the whole truth, especially as long as there continue to be people who will abusively ask questions about things they have no right to full information about.
– Dronz
2 hours ago
@raumkrieger I'd say it would be terrible if everyone answered every question with the whole truth, especially as long as there continue to be people who will abusively ask questions about things they have no right to full information about.
– Dronz
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Simple, you just need to look your boss in the face and say "No, why would I do that". Maintain eye contact the entire time.
This essentially puts your boss in a position where your boss has to either admit to doing things poorly or convince you as to why you should leave the company. If your boss is smart they'll leave it alone. If your boss isn't then you can just follow up pretty much any response to that question with, "Sounds like you really want me to leave".
Any boss who, "gets things out of people" should be handled in a polite and cut throat manner. They've earned it.
add a comment |
Simple, you just need to look your boss in the face and say "No, why would I do that". Maintain eye contact the entire time.
This essentially puts your boss in a position where your boss has to either admit to doing things poorly or convince you as to why you should leave the company. If your boss is smart they'll leave it alone. If your boss isn't then you can just follow up pretty much any response to that question with, "Sounds like you really want me to leave".
Any boss who, "gets things out of people" should be handled in a polite and cut throat manner. They've earned it.
add a comment |
Simple, you just need to look your boss in the face and say "No, why would I do that". Maintain eye contact the entire time.
This essentially puts your boss in a position where your boss has to either admit to doing things poorly or convince you as to why you should leave the company. If your boss is smart they'll leave it alone. If your boss isn't then you can just follow up pretty much any response to that question with, "Sounds like you really want me to leave".
Any boss who, "gets things out of people" should be handled in a polite and cut throat manner. They've earned it.
Simple, you just need to look your boss in the face and say "No, why would I do that". Maintain eye contact the entire time.
This essentially puts your boss in a position where your boss has to either admit to doing things poorly or convince you as to why you should leave the company. If your boss is smart they'll leave it alone. If your boss isn't then you can just follow up pretty much any response to that question with, "Sounds like you really want me to leave".
Any boss who, "gets things out of people" should be handled in a polite and cut throat manner. They've earned it.
answered 11 hours ago
SteveSteve
3,327621
3,327621
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is no good solution.
There is no answer that allows you to be honest and also keep your hand hidden. Either you're telling the truth or not. There's no middle ground here.
There's no version of this that plays out that makes you look good. If you lie, you destroy some of your professional reputation, but you get to leave on your terms.
If you tell the truth then you might be fired in advance or phased out in response, but you keep your professional reputation in one piece.
You COULD maybe find a middle ground. Having a meeting and making clear that you intend to leave in the foreseeable future and help the company find and train someone before your deadline.
I don't know the best answer, but it's clear from the break down of the question is that there is no GOOD solution. There's just varying degrees of discomfort.
My answer to "are you quitting"
No, but I'm not happy here and I can't see myself staying here much longer.
.. and then follow up with a list of things that are making you unhappy.
This is assuming you can be convinced to stay.
If you cannot be convinced to stay then:
Yes, but I'm not going to abandon you. I'd like to work with you on finding my replacement and even some training if they need it.
This is a fairly diplomatic and responsible answer.
My issue with lying to an employer, is they're paying to do work. But if you're there on a pretense of essentially running out the clock till it's time to go, that's... disingenuous.
Final note: We need to stop operating in bad faith. There are many managers out there who get it. Who get that we need to grow as professionals, not everyone is out to get you and maybe assuming good faith isn't such a bad approach. Maybe this manager is just trying to keep the ship on course and if that's the case, he can also be a really great ally in your transition or in getting new opportunities with a referral.
add a comment |
There is no good solution.
There is no answer that allows you to be honest and also keep your hand hidden. Either you're telling the truth or not. There's no middle ground here.
There's no version of this that plays out that makes you look good. If you lie, you destroy some of your professional reputation, but you get to leave on your terms.
If you tell the truth then you might be fired in advance or phased out in response, but you keep your professional reputation in one piece.
You COULD maybe find a middle ground. Having a meeting and making clear that you intend to leave in the foreseeable future and help the company find and train someone before your deadline.
I don't know the best answer, but it's clear from the break down of the question is that there is no GOOD solution. There's just varying degrees of discomfort.
My answer to "are you quitting"
No, but I'm not happy here and I can't see myself staying here much longer.
.. and then follow up with a list of things that are making you unhappy.
This is assuming you can be convinced to stay.
If you cannot be convinced to stay then:
Yes, but I'm not going to abandon you. I'd like to work with you on finding my replacement and even some training if they need it.
This is a fairly diplomatic and responsible answer.
My issue with lying to an employer, is they're paying to do work. But if you're there on a pretense of essentially running out the clock till it's time to go, that's... disingenuous.
Final note: We need to stop operating in bad faith. There are many managers out there who get it. Who get that we need to grow as professionals, not everyone is out to get you and maybe assuming good faith isn't such a bad approach. Maybe this manager is just trying to keep the ship on course and if that's the case, he can also be a really great ally in your transition or in getting new opportunities with a referral.
add a comment |
There is no good solution.
There is no answer that allows you to be honest and also keep your hand hidden. Either you're telling the truth or not. There's no middle ground here.
There's no version of this that plays out that makes you look good. If you lie, you destroy some of your professional reputation, but you get to leave on your terms.
If you tell the truth then you might be fired in advance or phased out in response, but you keep your professional reputation in one piece.
You COULD maybe find a middle ground. Having a meeting and making clear that you intend to leave in the foreseeable future and help the company find and train someone before your deadline.
I don't know the best answer, but it's clear from the break down of the question is that there is no GOOD solution. There's just varying degrees of discomfort.
My answer to "are you quitting"
No, but I'm not happy here and I can't see myself staying here much longer.
.. and then follow up with a list of things that are making you unhappy.
This is assuming you can be convinced to stay.
If you cannot be convinced to stay then:
Yes, but I'm not going to abandon you. I'd like to work with you on finding my replacement and even some training if they need it.
This is a fairly diplomatic and responsible answer.
My issue with lying to an employer, is they're paying to do work. But if you're there on a pretense of essentially running out the clock till it's time to go, that's... disingenuous.
Final note: We need to stop operating in bad faith. There are many managers out there who get it. Who get that we need to grow as professionals, not everyone is out to get you and maybe assuming good faith isn't such a bad approach. Maybe this manager is just trying to keep the ship on course and if that's the case, he can also be a really great ally in your transition or in getting new opportunities with a referral.
There is no good solution.
There is no answer that allows you to be honest and also keep your hand hidden. Either you're telling the truth or not. There's no middle ground here.
There's no version of this that plays out that makes you look good. If you lie, you destroy some of your professional reputation, but you get to leave on your terms.
If you tell the truth then you might be fired in advance or phased out in response, but you keep your professional reputation in one piece.
You COULD maybe find a middle ground. Having a meeting and making clear that you intend to leave in the foreseeable future and help the company find and train someone before your deadline.
I don't know the best answer, but it's clear from the break down of the question is that there is no GOOD solution. There's just varying degrees of discomfort.
My answer to "are you quitting"
No, but I'm not happy here and I can't see myself staying here much longer.
.. and then follow up with a list of things that are making you unhappy.
This is assuming you can be convinced to stay.
If you cannot be convinced to stay then:
Yes, but I'm not going to abandon you. I'd like to work with you on finding my replacement and even some training if they need it.
This is a fairly diplomatic and responsible answer.
My issue with lying to an employer, is they're paying to do work. But if you're there on a pretense of essentially running out the clock till it's time to go, that's... disingenuous.
Final note: We need to stop operating in bad faith. There are many managers out there who get it. Who get that we need to grow as professionals, not everyone is out to get you and maybe assuming good faith isn't such a bad approach. Maybe this manager is just trying to keep the ship on course and if that's the case, he can also be a really great ally in your transition or in getting new opportunities with a referral.
answered 9 hours ago
ShinEmperorShinEmperor
3,128518
3,128518
add a comment |
add a comment |
While other answers are helpful, I'd add that telling him outright that the line of questioning is not appropriate should stem the badgering/pursuit he is expected to do.
You may have to answer briefly first with a No or something evasive, and then follow with halting further questions. You still need to choose your own words in doing so, but choosing in advance may make you more comfortable going into that meeting. Highlighting that he should stop seems like something he won't be expecting or prepared for.
add a comment |
While other answers are helpful, I'd add that telling him outright that the line of questioning is not appropriate should stem the badgering/pursuit he is expected to do.
You may have to answer briefly first with a No or something evasive, and then follow with halting further questions. You still need to choose your own words in doing so, but choosing in advance may make you more comfortable going into that meeting. Highlighting that he should stop seems like something he won't be expecting or prepared for.
add a comment |
While other answers are helpful, I'd add that telling him outright that the line of questioning is not appropriate should stem the badgering/pursuit he is expected to do.
You may have to answer briefly first with a No or something evasive, and then follow with halting further questions. You still need to choose your own words in doing so, but choosing in advance may make you more comfortable going into that meeting. Highlighting that he should stop seems like something he won't be expecting or prepared for.
While other answers are helpful, I'd add that telling him outright that the line of questioning is not appropriate should stem the badgering/pursuit he is expected to do.
You may have to answer briefly first with a No or something evasive, and then follow with halting further questions. You still need to choose your own words in doing so, but choosing in advance may make you more comfortable going into that meeting. Highlighting that he should stop seems like something he won't be expecting or prepared for.
answered 8 hours ago
donjuedodonjuedo
461410
461410
add a comment |
add a comment |
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
disillusioned_postdoc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133467%2fhow-to-answer-pointed-are-you-quitting-questioning-when-i-dont-want-them-to-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I had added an answer, but this is just a duplicate actually
– Atizs
14 hours ago
3
Are you committed to leaving? Is there absolutely no way you can have a conversation about your situation and he can attempt to fix whatever it is you are unhappy with? That would be a more mutually fruitful situation. If he doesn't know, he cannot help but I realise that's not necessarily the case.
– LoztInSpace
14 hours ago
2
@Nivas why not make this an answer?
– Mark
12 hours ago
2
I will add one more to @Nivas which are great: "Why would you ask that"? The bottom line is that, like most people, managers tend to think they are wonderful at their job and everyone wants to work for them. No need to dissuade them from that illusion.
– Pete B.
11 hours ago
Lying isn't always wrong. In the Old Testament, the midwives lie to Pharoah, who ordered them to kill all Hebrew male infants. God Himself rewards them for their lying. So at least in the Judeo-Christian moral system, lying is OK, even honorable and required, in certain situations. To save a life, for instance, or to throw a surprise party, or in the case above where the truth would cause harm. You're probably a bad liar because your conscience is bothering you. Your conscience is clear here. The boss is a predator and you're protecting your career.
– B. Goddard
10 hours ago