Why was the “bread communication” in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?Why was the end of Watchmen changed in the movie version?Why was a certain character in The Hunger Games killed?Did Peter Jackson ever explain why he left out the Scouring of the Shire?Why did Harry not repair his wand in the movie?Are there any differences between the Catching Fire movie and book?Why were the trackers necessary in Catching Fire?The Hunger Angst. Why the Arena tech yet the population is subjugated?Why didn't a certain character communicate more to his co-conspirators in Catching Fire?Why didn't the Tributes jump the gun in Catching Fire?Why was Gale edited out of the propos in the movie version?
Copycat chess is back
Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?
What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?
What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?
Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?
Crop image to path created in TikZ?
How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?
Is Social Media Science Fiction?
aging parents with no investments
Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
How could a lack of term limits lead to a "dictatorship?"
Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?
Ideas for 3rd eye abilities
Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?
How do I create uniquely male characters?
What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?
What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files
Where to refill my bottle in India?
How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)
Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium
Are objects structures and/or vice versa?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Why was the “bread communication” in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?
Why was the end of Watchmen changed in the movie version?Why was a certain character in The Hunger Games killed?Did Peter Jackson ever explain why he left out the Scouring of the Shire?Why did Harry not repair his wand in the movie?Are there any differences between the Catching Fire movie and book?Why were the trackers necessary in Catching Fire?The Hunger Angst. Why the Arena tech yet the population is subjugated?Why didn't a certain character communicate more to his co-conspirators in Catching Fire?Why didn't the Tributes jump the gun in Catching Fire?Why was Gale edited out of the propos in the movie version?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.
Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.
This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?
adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire
New contributor
add a comment |
In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.
Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.
This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?
adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire
New contributor
8
why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?
– witchy
13 hours ago
add a comment |
In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.
Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.
This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?
adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire
New contributor
In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.
Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.
This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?
adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire
adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire
New contributor
New contributor
edited 13 hours ago
Thunderforge
31.4k23149310
31.4k23149310
New contributor
asked 14 hours ago
PanchoaPanchoa
616
616
New contributor
New contributor
8
why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?
– witchy
13 hours ago
add a comment |
8
why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?
– witchy
13 hours ago
8
8
why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?
– witchy
13 hours ago
why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?
– witchy
13 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques
Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.
Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.
The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray
The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.
Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.
4
"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
– Thunderforge
13 hours ago
1
@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
– Darrel Hoffman
12 hours ago
1
I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
– Panchoa
12 hours ago
3
@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
– Upper_Case
10 hours ago
1
@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.
– Upper_Case
9 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208706%2fwhy-was-the-bread-communication-in-the-arena-of-catching-fire-left-out-in-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques
Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.
Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.
The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray
The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.
Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.
4
"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
– Thunderforge
13 hours ago
1
@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
– Darrel Hoffman
12 hours ago
1
I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
– Panchoa
12 hours ago
3
@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
– Upper_Case
10 hours ago
1
@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.
– Upper_Case
9 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques
Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.
Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.
The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray
The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.
Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.
4
"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
– Thunderforge
13 hours ago
1
@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
– Darrel Hoffman
12 hours ago
1
I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
– Panchoa
12 hours ago
3
@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
– Upper_Case
10 hours ago
1
@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.
– Upper_Case
9 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques
Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.
Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.
The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray
The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.
Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.
Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques
Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.
Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.
The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray
The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.
Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus
2,368723
2,368723
4
"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
– Thunderforge
13 hours ago
1
@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
– Darrel Hoffman
12 hours ago
1
I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
– Panchoa
12 hours ago
3
@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
– Upper_Case
10 hours ago
1
@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.
– Upper_Case
9 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
4
"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
– Thunderforge
13 hours ago
1
@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
– Darrel Hoffman
12 hours ago
1
I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
– Panchoa
12 hours ago
3
@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
– Upper_Case
10 hours ago
1
@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.
– Upper_Case
9 hours ago
4
4
"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
– Thunderforge
13 hours ago
"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
– Thunderforge
13 hours ago
1
1
@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
– Darrel Hoffman
12 hours ago
@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
– Darrel Hoffman
12 hours ago
1
1
I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
– Panchoa
12 hours ago
I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
– Panchoa
12 hours ago
3
3
@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
– Upper_Case
10 hours ago
@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
– Upper_Case
10 hours ago
1
1
@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.
– Upper_Case
9 hours ago
@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.
– Upper_Case
9 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208706%2fwhy-was-the-bread-communication-in-the-arena-of-catching-fire-left-out-in-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
8
why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?
– witchy
13 hours ago