Why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?Bayesian logit model - intuitive explanation?Are logistic regression coefficient estimates biased when the predictor has large variance?logistic regression with slackClosed form for the variance of a sum of two estimates in logistic regression?Evaluate posterior predictive distribution in Bayesian linear regressionClassical vs Bayesian logistic regression assumptionsCase Control Sampling in Logistic RegressionFit logistic regression with linear constraints on coefficients in RIs Bayesian Ridge Regression another name of Bayesian Linear Regression?Bayesian Inference for More Than Linear RegressionEconometrics: What are the assumptions of logistic regression for causal inference?
Extract rows of a table, that include less than x NULLs
Determining Impedance With An Antenna Analyzer
How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?
What are some good books on Machine Learning and AI like Krugman, Wells and Graddy's "Essentials of Economics"
How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?
Assassin's bullet with mercury
Forming a German sentence with/without the verb at the end
What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?
Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?
Different meanings of こわい
How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?
What does the expression "A Mann!" means
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?
How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?
Expand and Contract
Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions
CAST throwing error when run in stored procedure but not when run as raw query
iPad being using in wall mount battery swollen
How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?
Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?
Why do bosons tend to occupy the same state?
What do you call someone who asks many questions?
Which is the best way to check return result?
Why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?
Bayesian logit model - intuitive explanation?Are logistic regression coefficient estimates biased when the predictor has large variance?logistic regression with slackClosed form for the variance of a sum of two estimates in logistic regression?Evaluate posterior predictive distribution in Bayesian linear regressionClassical vs Bayesian logistic regression assumptionsCase Control Sampling in Logistic RegressionFit logistic regression with linear constraints on coefficients in RIs Bayesian Ridge Regression another name of Bayesian Linear Regression?Bayesian Inference for More Than Linear RegressionEconometrics: What are the assumptions of logistic regression for causal inference?
$begingroup$
I've read here that
... (Bayesian linear regression) is most similar to Bayesian inference
in logistic regression, but in some ways logistic regression is even
simpler, because there is no variance term to estimate, only the
regression parameters.
Why is it the case, why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?
logistic bayesian variance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've read here that
... (Bayesian linear regression) is most similar to Bayesian inference
in logistic regression, but in some ways logistic regression is even
simpler, because there is no variance term to estimate, only the
regression parameters.
Why is it the case, why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?
logistic bayesian variance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've read here that
... (Bayesian linear regression) is most similar to Bayesian inference
in logistic regression, but in some ways logistic regression is even
simpler, because there is no variance term to estimate, only the
regression parameters.
Why is it the case, why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?
logistic bayesian variance
$endgroup$
I've read here that
... (Bayesian linear regression) is most similar to Bayesian inference
in logistic regression, but in some ways logistic regression is even
simpler, because there is no variance term to estimate, only the
regression parameters.
Why is it the case, why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?
logistic bayesian variance
logistic bayesian variance
asked 1 hour ago
PatrickPatrick
1396
1396
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Logistic regression, Bayesian or not, is a model defined in terms of Bernoulli distribution. The distribution is parametrized by "probability of success" $p$ with mean $p$ and variance $p(1-p)$, i.e. the variance directly follows from the mean. So there is no "separate" variance term, this is what the quote seems to say.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@patrick for linear regression $y = mx + c + epsilon$, whereas logistic regression p(y=1|x) = logistic(mx +c).
$endgroup$
– seanv507
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
@seanv507 and would it make sense to have $p(y=1|x)=logistic(mx+c+epsilon)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Patrick
54 secs ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f401045%2fwhy-no-variance-term-in-bayesian-logistic-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Logistic regression, Bayesian or not, is a model defined in terms of Bernoulli distribution. The distribution is parametrized by "probability of success" $p$ with mean $p$ and variance $p(1-p)$, i.e. the variance directly follows from the mean. So there is no "separate" variance term, this is what the quote seems to say.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@patrick for linear regression $y = mx + c + epsilon$, whereas logistic regression p(y=1|x) = logistic(mx +c).
$endgroup$
– seanv507
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
@seanv507 and would it make sense to have $p(y=1|x)=logistic(mx+c+epsilon)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Patrick
54 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Logistic regression, Bayesian or not, is a model defined in terms of Bernoulli distribution. The distribution is parametrized by "probability of success" $p$ with mean $p$ and variance $p(1-p)$, i.e. the variance directly follows from the mean. So there is no "separate" variance term, this is what the quote seems to say.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@patrick for linear regression $y = mx + c + epsilon$, whereas logistic regression p(y=1|x) = logistic(mx +c).
$endgroup$
– seanv507
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
@seanv507 and would it make sense to have $p(y=1|x)=logistic(mx+c+epsilon)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Patrick
54 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Logistic regression, Bayesian or not, is a model defined in terms of Bernoulli distribution. The distribution is parametrized by "probability of success" $p$ with mean $p$ and variance $p(1-p)$, i.e. the variance directly follows from the mean. So there is no "separate" variance term, this is what the quote seems to say.
$endgroup$
Logistic regression, Bayesian or not, is a model defined in terms of Bernoulli distribution. The distribution is parametrized by "probability of success" $p$ with mean $p$ and variance $p(1-p)$, i.e. the variance directly follows from the mean. So there is no "separate" variance term, this is what the quote seems to say.
answered 51 mins ago
Tim♦Tim
59.6k9131224
59.6k9131224
$begingroup$
@patrick for linear regression $y = mx + c + epsilon$, whereas logistic regression p(y=1|x) = logistic(mx +c).
$endgroup$
– seanv507
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
@seanv507 and would it make sense to have $p(y=1|x)=logistic(mx+c+epsilon)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Patrick
54 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@patrick for linear regression $y = mx + c + epsilon$, whereas logistic regression p(y=1|x) = logistic(mx +c).
$endgroup$
– seanv507
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
@seanv507 and would it make sense to have $p(y=1|x)=logistic(mx+c+epsilon)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Patrick
54 secs ago
$begingroup$
@patrick for linear regression $y = mx + c + epsilon$, whereas logistic regression p(y=1|x) = logistic(mx +c).
$endgroup$
– seanv507
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
@patrick for linear regression $y = mx + c + epsilon$, whereas logistic regression p(y=1|x) = logistic(mx +c).
$endgroup$
– seanv507
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
@seanv507 and would it make sense to have $p(y=1|x)=logistic(mx+c+epsilon)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Patrick
54 secs ago
$begingroup$
@seanv507 and would it make sense to have $p(y=1|x)=logistic(mx+c+epsilon)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Patrick
54 secs ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f401045%2fwhy-no-variance-term-in-bayesian-logistic-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown