How to run a prison with the smallest amount of guards?How to Survive a Tough Prison as a Weakling?How can a prison offer a safe way for inmates to commit suicide?How to enforce a sign language curfew in a maximum security prison?How should implanted technology be handled in prison?How would we maintain an unbroken line of communication with a moon base?Early Army without foraging: How do we keep ourselves supplied in the field?How can the American government legalize a program that implants microchips into convicts in order to curb prison violence and future crimes?On a world with differently sized humans, how do I keep wages fair?How to run a prison planet?

Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?

Lay out the Carpet

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

How many times can American Tourist re-enter UK in same 6 month period?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?

How does the UK government determine the size of a mandate?

How did Doctor Strange see the winning outcome in Avengers: Infinity War?

Is expanding the research of a group into machine learning as a PhD student risky?

How does Loki do this?

How can we prove that any integral in the set of non-elementary integrals cannot be expressed in the form of elementary functions?

How to run a prison with the smallest amount of guards?

Detecting if an element is found inside a container

Do sorcerers' subtle spells require a skill check to be unseen?

Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?

CREATE opcode: what does it really do?

Fastening aluminum fascia to wooden subfascia



How to run a prison with the smallest amount of guards?


How to Survive a Tough Prison as a Weakling?How can a prison offer a safe way for inmates to commit suicide?How to enforce a sign language curfew in a maximum security prison?How should implanted technology be handled in prison?How would we maintain an unbroken line of communication with a moon base?Early Army without foraging: How do we keep ourselves supplied in the field?How can the American government legalize a program that implants microchips into convicts in order to curb prison violence and future crimes?On a world with differently sized humans, how do I keep wages fair?How to run a prison planet?













2












$begingroup$


So, this takes place in a post apocalyptic world, within the borders of a government called the USC. 30 miles north of The Junction (modern-day Bakersfield) is the JSCF, or Junction State Correctional Facility.



About 2500 prisoners are held within the JSCF. The JSCF is used as a punitive labor prison, where convicts are used to do public works projects, such as building roads and railways.



The USC wants to use the smallest amount of guards they can, to cut costs. So, my question is how could a labor prison be run in a way that minimizes the amount of guards needed to run it?



The current technological level is near that of 1890s America, and the USC has considerable infrastructure



Basic layout of JSCF (please tell me if it isn’t realistic)
enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The smallest number of guards would be to just kill everyone. A prison is humane punishment or a source of labor. What are the needs of your prison?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrey
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Andrey: What do you mean? The needs of my prison are to punish/rehabilitate prisoners by use of hard labor
    $endgroup$
    – DT Cooper
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You don't state how 'post' apocalyptic the world is, but presumably there are sufficient resources to make it worthwhile feeding and housing criminals rather than just killing them. Without any other details, this doesn't seem any different to real-life for-profit prisons that operate nowadays. These are already (by their very nature) answering the question of what the minimum-viable staffing level is.
    $endgroup$
    – K. Morgan
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You also don't state the tech level of the world you are building - is it greater than we have now? Less? This affects the nature of the answers you will get (e.g. a fully-automated AI-run murder prison requires zero staff).
    $endgroup$
    – K. Morgan
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to look at the Panopticon (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon) which was designed to work with a single guard. Would be a fairly radical redesign of the structure though.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew
    3 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


So, this takes place in a post apocalyptic world, within the borders of a government called the USC. 30 miles north of The Junction (modern-day Bakersfield) is the JSCF, or Junction State Correctional Facility.



About 2500 prisoners are held within the JSCF. The JSCF is used as a punitive labor prison, where convicts are used to do public works projects, such as building roads and railways.



The USC wants to use the smallest amount of guards they can, to cut costs. So, my question is how could a labor prison be run in a way that minimizes the amount of guards needed to run it?



The current technological level is near that of 1890s America, and the USC has considerable infrastructure



Basic layout of JSCF (please tell me if it isn’t realistic)
enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The smallest number of guards would be to just kill everyone. A prison is humane punishment or a source of labor. What are the needs of your prison?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrey
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Andrey: What do you mean? The needs of my prison are to punish/rehabilitate prisoners by use of hard labor
    $endgroup$
    – DT Cooper
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You don't state how 'post' apocalyptic the world is, but presumably there are sufficient resources to make it worthwhile feeding and housing criminals rather than just killing them. Without any other details, this doesn't seem any different to real-life for-profit prisons that operate nowadays. These are already (by their very nature) answering the question of what the minimum-viable staffing level is.
    $endgroup$
    – K. Morgan
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You also don't state the tech level of the world you are building - is it greater than we have now? Less? This affects the nature of the answers you will get (e.g. a fully-automated AI-run murder prison requires zero staff).
    $endgroup$
    – K. Morgan
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to look at the Panopticon (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon) which was designed to work with a single guard. Would be a fairly radical redesign of the structure though.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew
    3 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


So, this takes place in a post apocalyptic world, within the borders of a government called the USC. 30 miles north of The Junction (modern-day Bakersfield) is the JSCF, or Junction State Correctional Facility.



About 2500 prisoners are held within the JSCF. The JSCF is used as a punitive labor prison, where convicts are used to do public works projects, such as building roads and railways.



The USC wants to use the smallest amount of guards they can, to cut costs. So, my question is how could a labor prison be run in a way that minimizes the amount of guards needed to run it?



The current technological level is near that of 1890s America, and the USC has considerable infrastructure



Basic layout of JSCF (please tell me if it isn’t realistic)
enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




So, this takes place in a post apocalyptic world, within the borders of a government called the USC. 30 miles north of The Junction (modern-day Bakersfield) is the JSCF, or Junction State Correctional Facility.



About 2500 prisoners are held within the JSCF. The JSCF is used as a punitive labor prison, where convicts are used to do public works projects, such as building roads and railways.



The USC wants to use the smallest amount of guards they can, to cut costs. So, my question is how could a labor prison be run in a way that minimizes the amount of guards needed to run it?



The current technological level is near that of 1890s America, and the USC has considerable infrastructure



Basic layout of JSCF (please tell me if it isn’t realistic)
enter image description here







logistics prison






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







DT Cooper

















asked 5 hours ago









DT CooperDT Cooper

2,46171846




2,46171846







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The smallest number of guards would be to just kill everyone. A prison is humane punishment or a source of labor. What are the needs of your prison?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrey
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Andrey: What do you mean? The needs of my prison are to punish/rehabilitate prisoners by use of hard labor
    $endgroup$
    – DT Cooper
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You don't state how 'post' apocalyptic the world is, but presumably there are sufficient resources to make it worthwhile feeding and housing criminals rather than just killing them. Without any other details, this doesn't seem any different to real-life for-profit prisons that operate nowadays. These are already (by their very nature) answering the question of what the minimum-viable staffing level is.
    $endgroup$
    – K. Morgan
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You also don't state the tech level of the world you are building - is it greater than we have now? Less? This affects the nature of the answers you will get (e.g. a fully-automated AI-run murder prison requires zero staff).
    $endgroup$
    – K. Morgan
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to look at the Panopticon (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon) which was designed to work with a single guard. Would be a fairly radical redesign of the structure though.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew
    3 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The smallest number of guards would be to just kill everyone. A prison is humane punishment or a source of labor. What are the needs of your prison?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrey
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Andrey: What do you mean? The needs of my prison are to punish/rehabilitate prisoners by use of hard labor
    $endgroup$
    – DT Cooper
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You don't state how 'post' apocalyptic the world is, but presumably there are sufficient resources to make it worthwhile feeding and housing criminals rather than just killing them. Without any other details, this doesn't seem any different to real-life for-profit prisons that operate nowadays. These are already (by their very nature) answering the question of what the minimum-viable staffing level is.
    $endgroup$
    – K. Morgan
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You also don't state the tech level of the world you are building - is it greater than we have now? Less? This affects the nature of the answers you will get (e.g. a fully-automated AI-run murder prison requires zero staff).
    $endgroup$
    – K. Morgan
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to look at the Panopticon (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon) which was designed to work with a single guard. Would be a fairly radical redesign of the structure though.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew
    3 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
The smallest number of guards would be to just kill everyone. A prison is humane punishment or a source of labor. What are the needs of your prison?
$endgroup$
– Andrey
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
The smallest number of guards would be to just kill everyone. A prison is humane punishment or a source of labor. What are the needs of your prison?
$endgroup$
– Andrey
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Andrey: What do you mean? The needs of my prison are to punish/rehabilitate prisoners by use of hard labor
$endgroup$
– DT Cooper
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Andrey: What do you mean? The needs of my prison are to punish/rehabilitate prisoners by use of hard labor
$endgroup$
– DT Cooper
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
You don't state how 'post' apocalyptic the world is, but presumably there are sufficient resources to make it worthwhile feeding and housing criminals rather than just killing them. Without any other details, this doesn't seem any different to real-life for-profit prisons that operate nowadays. These are already (by their very nature) answering the question of what the minimum-viable staffing level is.
$endgroup$
– K. Morgan
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
You don't state how 'post' apocalyptic the world is, but presumably there are sufficient resources to make it worthwhile feeding and housing criminals rather than just killing them. Without any other details, this doesn't seem any different to real-life for-profit prisons that operate nowadays. These are already (by their very nature) answering the question of what the minimum-viable staffing level is.
$endgroup$
– K. Morgan
4 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
You also don't state the tech level of the world you are building - is it greater than we have now? Less? This affects the nature of the answers you will get (e.g. a fully-automated AI-run murder prison requires zero staff).
$endgroup$
– K. Morgan
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
You also don't state the tech level of the world you are building - is it greater than we have now? Less? This affects the nature of the answers you will get (e.g. a fully-automated AI-run murder prison requires zero staff).
$endgroup$
– K. Morgan
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
You might want to look at the Panopticon (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon) which was designed to work with a single guard. Would be a fairly radical redesign of the structure though.
$endgroup$
– Matthew
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
You might want to look at the Panopticon (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon) which was designed to work with a single guard. Would be a fairly radical redesign of the structure though.
$endgroup$
– Matthew
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Turn prisoners into managers



Many societies across time have used this tactic (Romans for one, Nazis and Stalinists for more modern/malicious examples). Find the prisoners who are willing to enforce rules on other prisoners in exchange for more rights/luxuries/privileges. This creates a type of managerial oversight among the prisoners themselves. It's better to manage than to labor.



Extreme rewards and punishments



Any small violation of rules is enforced brutally. Beatings, tortures, etc. Snitches are rewarded handsomely with accommodations and protection from guards. This keeps prisoners looking for relief an easy way out of their rough situation: betray someone acting out. This type of regulation also keeps prisoners from trying to group together or make a consolidated effort at rebellion.



Group rewards and punishments



If a road or building is constructed well, everyone is rewarded with a day off. If one person makes a run for it, everyone in the group has to work through the night. This reinforces the idea of group obedience.



Keep prisoners occupied



Wake up, work, sleep. Repeat. Give them neither time nor energy to think about anything except their labor. Just enough food to get the work done, and only at the end of the day when they finish the labor. No lunch breaks. Keeping prisoners hungry and desperate for "one more meal" will deplete resolve and eliminate any practical hope of escape.



Although this also breeds intense resentment, there should be a clear path to eliminate or minimize their suffering. Snitching on others, pursuing management over other guards, and performing good labor are simple, safe, straight-forward paths to make their situation better. If there is no (reasonable) hope of escape, but clear paths "up" by turning on other prisoners, then prisoners will pursue those options. Make extreme examples of those who don't.



All these together allow for a few, well-organized, intensely brutal and malicious guards to control a large number of prisoners.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So divide and conquer, basically
    $endgroup$
    – DT Cooper
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depending on how brutal the society is, the 'group punishment' mindset can turn the majority of your prisoners into guards - Every 'cell group' overwatched by a guard with a Gatling gun: Any serious infraction by any member of the group results in said Gatling gun being used to punish the entire cell group... Prisoners now have a vested interest in ensuring no one around them steps out of line.
    $endgroup$
    – TheLuckless
    3 hours ago


















5












$begingroup$

Inmates are the guards. This is the Trusty system.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusty_system_(prison)




The trusty system had designated inmates used by staff to control and
administer physical punishment to other inmates according to a strict,
prison-determined, inmate hierarchy of power...



The bulk of guarding and disciplining of the inmates was performed by
inmate trusties. They also performed most of the administrative work,
supervised by a few employees... Essentially, the trusties ran the
prison system. Highest in the prison inmate hierarchy were the inmates
armed with rifles, called the "trusty shooters." Their job was to act
as prison guards and control other inmates on a day-to-day basis in
the residential camps or out on the field work crews. Next came the
unarmed trusties who performed janitorial, clerical, and other menial
tasks for the prison's staff. Simple tasks, such as distributing
medication, were carried out by other categories of inmates such as
"hallboys.' Inmate trusties enforced discipline within the prison
inmate living quarters (16 different residential camps) and in the
work camps and farms.




Prisons using this system did it for exactly your reasons: limit required paid employees. Trustys were chosen as people who would recognize when they had a good thing going and not screw it up. Oversight was not a priority. American prisons in the South had to quit doing this this way in the 1970s but this system is still used in other countries.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142593%2fhow-to-run-a-prison-with-the-smallest-amount-of-guards%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    Turn prisoners into managers



    Many societies across time have used this tactic (Romans for one, Nazis and Stalinists for more modern/malicious examples). Find the prisoners who are willing to enforce rules on other prisoners in exchange for more rights/luxuries/privileges. This creates a type of managerial oversight among the prisoners themselves. It's better to manage than to labor.



    Extreme rewards and punishments



    Any small violation of rules is enforced brutally. Beatings, tortures, etc. Snitches are rewarded handsomely with accommodations and protection from guards. This keeps prisoners looking for relief an easy way out of their rough situation: betray someone acting out. This type of regulation also keeps prisoners from trying to group together or make a consolidated effort at rebellion.



    Group rewards and punishments



    If a road or building is constructed well, everyone is rewarded with a day off. If one person makes a run for it, everyone in the group has to work through the night. This reinforces the idea of group obedience.



    Keep prisoners occupied



    Wake up, work, sleep. Repeat. Give them neither time nor energy to think about anything except their labor. Just enough food to get the work done, and only at the end of the day when they finish the labor. No lunch breaks. Keeping prisoners hungry and desperate for "one more meal" will deplete resolve and eliminate any practical hope of escape.



    Although this also breeds intense resentment, there should be a clear path to eliminate or minimize their suffering. Snitching on others, pursuing management over other guards, and performing good labor are simple, safe, straight-forward paths to make their situation better. If there is no (reasonable) hope of escape, but clear paths "up" by turning on other prisoners, then prisoners will pursue those options. Make extreme examples of those who don't.



    All these together allow for a few, well-organized, intensely brutal and malicious guards to control a large number of prisoners.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      So divide and conquer, basically
      $endgroup$
      – DT Cooper
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Depending on how brutal the society is, the 'group punishment' mindset can turn the majority of your prisoners into guards - Every 'cell group' overwatched by a guard with a Gatling gun: Any serious infraction by any member of the group results in said Gatling gun being used to punish the entire cell group... Prisoners now have a vested interest in ensuring no one around them steps out of line.
      $endgroup$
      – TheLuckless
      3 hours ago















    8












    $begingroup$

    Turn prisoners into managers



    Many societies across time have used this tactic (Romans for one, Nazis and Stalinists for more modern/malicious examples). Find the prisoners who are willing to enforce rules on other prisoners in exchange for more rights/luxuries/privileges. This creates a type of managerial oversight among the prisoners themselves. It's better to manage than to labor.



    Extreme rewards and punishments



    Any small violation of rules is enforced brutally. Beatings, tortures, etc. Snitches are rewarded handsomely with accommodations and protection from guards. This keeps prisoners looking for relief an easy way out of their rough situation: betray someone acting out. This type of regulation also keeps prisoners from trying to group together or make a consolidated effort at rebellion.



    Group rewards and punishments



    If a road or building is constructed well, everyone is rewarded with a day off. If one person makes a run for it, everyone in the group has to work through the night. This reinforces the idea of group obedience.



    Keep prisoners occupied



    Wake up, work, sleep. Repeat. Give them neither time nor energy to think about anything except their labor. Just enough food to get the work done, and only at the end of the day when they finish the labor. No lunch breaks. Keeping prisoners hungry and desperate for "one more meal" will deplete resolve and eliminate any practical hope of escape.



    Although this also breeds intense resentment, there should be a clear path to eliminate or minimize their suffering. Snitching on others, pursuing management over other guards, and performing good labor are simple, safe, straight-forward paths to make their situation better. If there is no (reasonable) hope of escape, but clear paths "up" by turning on other prisoners, then prisoners will pursue those options. Make extreme examples of those who don't.



    All these together allow for a few, well-organized, intensely brutal and malicious guards to control a large number of prisoners.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      So divide and conquer, basically
      $endgroup$
      – DT Cooper
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Depending on how brutal the society is, the 'group punishment' mindset can turn the majority of your prisoners into guards - Every 'cell group' overwatched by a guard with a Gatling gun: Any serious infraction by any member of the group results in said Gatling gun being used to punish the entire cell group... Prisoners now have a vested interest in ensuring no one around them steps out of line.
      $endgroup$
      – TheLuckless
      3 hours ago













    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    Turn prisoners into managers



    Many societies across time have used this tactic (Romans for one, Nazis and Stalinists for more modern/malicious examples). Find the prisoners who are willing to enforce rules on other prisoners in exchange for more rights/luxuries/privileges. This creates a type of managerial oversight among the prisoners themselves. It's better to manage than to labor.



    Extreme rewards and punishments



    Any small violation of rules is enforced brutally. Beatings, tortures, etc. Snitches are rewarded handsomely with accommodations and protection from guards. This keeps prisoners looking for relief an easy way out of their rough situation: betray someone acting out. This type of regulation also keeps prisoners from trying to group together or make a consolidated effort at rebellion.



    Group rewards and punishments



    If a road or building is constructed well, everyone is rewarded with a day off. If one person makes a run for it, everyone in the group has to work through the night. This reinforces the idea of group obedience.



    Keep prisoners occupied



    Wake up, work, sleep. Repeat. Give them neither time nor energy to think about anything except their labor. Just enough food to get the work done, and only at the end of the day when they finish the labor. No lunch breaks. Keeping prisoners hungry and desperate for "one more meal" will deplete resolve and eliminate any practical hope of escape.



    Although this also breeds intense resentment, there should be a clear path to eliminate or minimize their suffering. Snitching on others, pursuing management over other guards, and performing good labor are simple, safe, straight-forward paths to make their situation better. If there is no (reasonable) hope of escape, but clear paths "up" by turning on other prisoners, then prisoners will pursue those options. Make extreme examples of those who don't.



    All these together allow for a few, well-organized, intensely brutal and malicious guards to control a large number of prisoners.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Turn prisoners into managers



    Many societies across time have used this tactic (Romans for one, Nazis and Stalinists for more modern/malicious examples). Find the prisoners who are willing to enforce rules on other prisoners in exchange for more rights/luxuries/privileges. This creates a type of managerial oversight among the prisoners themselves. It's better to manage than to labor.



    Extreme rewards and punishments



    Any small violation of rules is enforced brutally. Beatings, tortures, etc. Snitches are rewarded handsomely with accommodations and protection from guards. This keeps prisoners looking for relief an easy way out of their rough situation: betray someone acting out. This type of regulation also keeps prisoners from trying to group together or make a consolidated effort at rebellion.



    Group rewards and punishments



    If a road or building is constructed well, everyone is rewarded with a day off. If one person makes a run for it, everyone in the group has to work through the night. This reinforces the idea of group obedience.



    Keep prisoners occupied



    Wake up, work, sleep. Repeat. Give them neither time nor energy to think about anything except their labor. Just enough food to get the work done, and only at the end of the day when they finish the labor. No lunch breaks. Keeping prisoners hungry and desperate for "one more meal" will deplete resolve and eliminate any practical hope of escape.



    Although this also breeds intense resentment, there should be a clear path to eliminate or minimize their suffering. Snitching on others, pursuing management over other guards, and performing good labor are simple, safe, straight-forward paths to make their situation better. If there is no (reasonable) hope of escape, but clear paths "up" by turning on other prisoners, then prisoners will pursue those options. Make extreme examples of those who don't.



    All these together allow for a few, well-organized, intensely brutal and malicious guards to control a large number of prisoners.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 4 hours ago









    cegfaultcegfault

    1,02248




    1,02248











    • $begingroup$
      So divide and conquer, basically
      $endgroup$
      – DT Cooper
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Depending on how brutal the society is, the 'group punishment' mindset can turn the majority of your prisoners into guards - Every 'cell group' overwatched by a guard with a Gatling gun: Any serious infraction by any member of the group results in said Gatling gun being used to punish the entire cell group... Prisoners now have a vested interest in ensuring no one around them steps out of line.
      $endgroup$
      – TheLuckless
      3 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      So divide and conquer, basically
      $endgroup$
      – DT Cooper
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Depending on how brutal the society is, the 'group punishment' mindset can turn the majority of your prisoners into guards - Every 'cell group' overwatched by a guard with a Gatling gun: Any serious infraction by any member of the group results in said Gatling gun being used to punish the entire cell group... Prisoners now have a vested interest in ensuring no one around them steps out of line.
      $endgroup$
      – TheLuckless
      3 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    So divide and conquer, basically
    $endgroup$
    – DT Cooper
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    So divide and conquer, basically
    $endgroup$
    – DT Cooper
    3 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Depending on how brutal the society is, the 'group punishment' mindset can turn the majority of your prisoners into guards - Every 'cell group' overwatched by a guard with a Gatling gun: Any serious infraction by any member of the group results in said Gatling gun being used to punish the entire cell group... Prisoners now have a vested interest in ensuring no one around them steps out of line.
    $endgroup$
    – TheLuckless
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Depending on how brutal the society is, the 'group punishment' mindset can turn the majority of your prisoners into guards - Every 'cell group' overwatched by a guard with a Gatling gun: Any serious infraction by any member of the group results in said Gatling gun being used to punish the entire cell group... Prisoners now have a vested interest in ensuring no one around them steps out of line.
    $endgroup$
    – TheLuckless
    3 hours ago











    5












    $begingroup$

    Inmates are the guards. This is the Trusty system.



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusty_system_(prison)




    The trusty system had designated inmates used by staff to control and
    administer physical punishment to other inmates according to a strict,
    prison-determined, inmate hierarchy of power...



    The bulk of guarding and disciplining of the inmates was performed by
    inmate trusties. They also performed most of the administrative work,
    supervised by a few employees... Essentially, the trusties ran the
    prison system. Highest in the prison inmate hierarchy were the inmates
    armed with rifles, called the "trusty shooters." Their job was to act
    as prison guards and control other inmates on a day-to-day basis in
    the residential camps or out on the field work crews. Next came the
    unarmed trusties who performed janitorial, clerical, and other menial
    tasks for the prison's staff. Simple tasks, such as distributing
    medication, were carried out by other categories of inmates such as
    "hallboys.' Inmate trusties enforced discipline within the prison
    inmate living quarters (16 different residential camps) and in the
    work camps and farms.




    Prisons using this system did it for exactly your reasons: limit required paid employees. Trustys were chosen as people who would recognize when they had a good thing going and not screw it up. Oversight was not a priority. American prisons in the South had to quit doing this this way in the 1970s but this system is still used in other countries.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      5












      $begingroup$

      Inmates are the guards. This is the Trusty system.



      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusty_system_(prison)




      The trusty system had designated inmates used by staff to control and
      administer physical punishment to other inmates according to a strict,
      prison-determined, inmate hierarchy of power...



      The bulk of guarding and disciplining of the inmates was performed by
      inmate trusties. They also performed most of the administrative work,
      supervised by a few employees... Essentially, the trusties ran the
      prison system. Highest in the prison inmate hierarchy were the inmates
      armed with rifles, called the "trusty shooters." Their job was to act
      as prison guards and control other inmates on a day-to-day basis in
      the residential camps or out on the field work crews. Next came the
      unarmed trusties who performed janitorial, clerical, and other menial
      tasks for the prison's staff. Simple tasks, such as distributing
      medication, were carried out by other categories of inmates such as
      "hallboys.' Inmate trusties enforced discipline within the prison
      inmate living quarters (16 different residential camps) and in the
      work camps and farms.




      Prisons using this system did it for exactly your reasons: limit required paid employees. Trustys were chosen as people who would recognize when they had a good thing going and not screw it up. Oversight was not a priority. American prisons in the South had to quit doing this this way in the 1970s but this system is still used in other countries.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        Inmates are the guards. This is the Trusty system.



        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusty_system_(prison)




        The trusty system had designated inmates used by staff to control and
        administer physical punishment to other inmates according to a strict,
        prison-determined, inmate hierarchy of power...



        The bulk of guarding and disciplining of the inmates was performed by
        inmate trusties. They also performed most of the administrative work,
        supervised by a few employees... Essentially, the trusties ran the
        prison system. Highest in the prison inmate hierarchy were the inmates
        armed with rifles, called the "trusty shooters." Their job was to act
        as prison guards and control other inmates on a day-to-day basis in
        the residential camps or out on the field work crews. Next came the
        unarmed trusties who performed janitorial, clerical, and other menial
        tasks for the prison's staff. Simple tasks, such as distributing
        medication, were carried out by other categories of inmates such as
        "hallboys.' Inmate trusties enforced discipline within the prison
        inmate living quarters (16 different residential camps) and in the
        work camps and farms.




        Prisons using this system did it for exactly your reasons: limit required paid employees. Trustys were chosen as people who would recognize when they had a good thing going and not screw it up. Oversight was not a priority. American prisons in the South had to quit doing this this way in the 1970s but this system is still used in other countries.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Inmates are the guards. This is the Trusty system.



        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusty_system_(prison)




        The trusty system had designated inmates used by staff to control and
        administer physical punishment to other inmates according to a strict,
        prison-determined, inmate hierarchy of power...



        The bulk of guarding and disciplining of the inmates was performed by
        inmate trusties. They also performed most of the administrative work,
        supervised by a few employees... Essentially, the trusties ran the
        prison system. Highest in the prison inmate hierarchy were the inmates
        armed with rifles, called the "trusty shooters." Their job was to act
        as prison guards and control other inmates on a day-to-day basis in
        the residential camps or out on the field work crews. Next came the
        unarmed trusties who performed janitorial, clerical, and other menial
        tasks for the prison's staff. Simple tasks, such as distributing
        medication, were carried out by other categories of inmates such as
        "hallboys.' Inmate trusties enforced discipline within the prison
        inmate living quarters (16 different residential camps) and in the
        work camps and farms.




        Prisons using this system did it for exactly your reasons: limit required paid employees. Trustys were chosen as people who would recognize when they had a good thing going and not screw it up. Oversight was not a priority. American prisons in the South had to quit doing this this way in the 1970s but this system is still used in other countries.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        WillkWillk

        115k27216480




        115k27216480



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142593%2fhow-to-run-a-prison-with-the-smallest-amount-of-guards%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can not update quote_id field of “quote_item” table magento 2Magento 2.1 - We can't remove the item. (Shopping Cart doesnt allow us to remove items before becomes empty)Add value for custom quote item attribute using REST apiREST API endpoint v1/carts/cartId/items always returns error messageCorrect way to save entries to databaseHow to remove all associated quote objects of a customer completelyMagento 2 - Save value from custom input field to quote_itemGet quote_item data using quote id and product id filter in Magento 2How to set additional data to quote_item table from controller in Magento 2?What is the purpose of additional_data column in quote_item table in magento2Set Custom Price to Quote item magento2 from controller

            How to solve knockout JS error in Magento 2 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?(Magento2) knockout.js:3012 Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process bindingUnable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Cannot read property `scopeLabel` of undefined on Product Detail PageCan't get Customer Data on frontend in Magento 2Magento2 Order Summary - unable to process bindingKO templates are not loading in Magento 2.1 applicationgetting knockout js error magento 2Product grid not load -— Unable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Product form not loaded in magento2Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process binding “if: function()return (isShowLegend()) ” magento 2

            Nissan Patrol Зміст Перше покоління — 4W60 (1951-1960) | Друге покоління — 60 series (1960-1980) | Третє покоління (1980–2002) | Четверте покоління — Y60 (1987–1998) | П'яте покоління — Y61 (1997–2013) | Шосте покоління — Y62 (2010- ) | Посилання | Зноски | Навігаційне менюОфіційний український сайтТест-драйв Nissan Patrol 2010 7-го поколінняNissan PatrolКак мы тестировали Nissan Patrol 2016рвиправивши або дописавши її