What can I do to 'burn' a journal? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhat to do if reviewers reject a paper without understanding the content?Should I contact the EIC for additional information regarding his decision on my paper?What to do if a discussion letter/paper is rejected because it's not an original research article?What does “reject and resubmit” mean?Firstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Do journals need to save all publication-relevant communicationsJournal review failurePaper rejected based on “informal review” - any point in appealing?How to handle unprofessional negative reviews from a journal?Is it possible to ask the identity of a particular reviewer to oppose for future submission?
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?
How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
Can a flute soloist sit?
What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?
Can I visit the Trinity College (Cambridge) library and see some of their rare books
Homework question about an engine pulling a train
What is the padding with red substance inside of steak packaging?
How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
Was credit for the black hole image misappropriated?
What happens to a Warlock's expended Spell Slots when they gain a Level?
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time
Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
Solving overdetermined system by QR decomposition
How to handle characters who are more educated than the author?
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
What can I do to 'burn' a journal?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhat to do if reviewers reject a paper without understanding the content?Should I contact the EIC for additional information regarding his decision on my paper?What to do if a discussion letter/paper is rejected because it's not an original research article?What does “reject and resubmit” mean?Firstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Do journals need to save all publication-relevant communicationsJournal review failurePaper rejected based on “informal review” - any point in appealing?How to handle unprofessional negative reviews from a journal?Is it possible to ask the identity of a particular reviewer to oppose for future submission?
Several months ago, I sent a paper to a journal (Transport Reviews). Today, I got back a_single_review_, from one reviewer, with comments from the editor that are a sad summary of that reviewers comments. The reviewer clearly wrote the review in a rush (stream-of-conciousness, mispellings, sentences lacking referent. I'm pissed. Is there a journal-ranking site out there, like 'rate my professor'?
And yes. It was totally rejected. But I would understand that, if I'd gotten 1/3 reviewers, instead of 0/1. And no, the editor provided no useful comments.
journals etiquette
edited 1 hour ago
henning
19.1k46696
asked 2 hours ago
MoxMox
38418
add a comment |
Several months ago, I sent a paper to a journal (Transport Reviews). Today, I got back a_single_review_, from one reviewer, with comments from the editor that are a sad summary of that reviewers comments. The reviewer clearly wrote the review in a rush (stream-of-conciousness, mispellings, sentences lacking referent. I'm pissed. Is there a journal-ranking site out there, like 'rate my professor'?
And yes. It was totally rejected. But I would understand that, if I'd gotten 1/3 reviewers, instead of 0/1. And no, the editor provided no useful comments.
journals etiquette
edited 1 hour ago
henning
19.1k46696
asked 2 hours ago
MoxMox
38418
4 months doesn't seem that long to me, but it really depends on your field. But not knowing the journal's review process (do they send it to three people initially? Or does the editor include themself as a reviewer?) it's hard to say much more.
– guifa
1 hour ago
7
This sounds like a rant, not a genuine question.
– YiFan
1 hour ago
1
Could it be that the reviewer isn't a native speaker?
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
It is normal to be angry. You have worked hard on the paper and expected the same level of care. Unfortunately, some times, this doesn't happen. It may be due to the topic area as opposed to the journal. Indeed, some times it is the editor! he/she may be lazy or too busy. Move on.
– Prof. Santa Claus
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Several months ago, I sent a paper to a journal (Transport Reviews). Today, I got back a_single_review_, from one reviewer, with comments from the editor that are a sad summary of that reviewers comments. The reviewer clearly wrote the review in a rush (stream-of-conciousness, mispellings, sentences lacking referent. I'm pissed. Is there a journal-ranking site out there, like 'rate my professor'?
And yes. It was totally rejected. But I would understand that, if I'd gotten 1/3 reviewers, instead of 0/1. And no, the editor provided no useful comments.
journals etiquette
edited 1 hour ago
henning
19.1k46696
asked 2 hours ago
MoxMox
38418
Several months ago, I sent a paper to a journal (Transport Reviews). Today, I got back a_single_review_, from one reviewer, with comments from the editor that are a sad summary of that reviewers comments. The reviewer clearly wrote the review in a rush (stream-of-conciousness, mispellings, sentences lacking referent. I'm pissed. Is there a journal-ranking site out there, like 'rate my professor'?
And yes. It was totally rejected. But I would understand that, if I'd gotten 1/3 reviewers, instead of 0/1. And no, the editor provided no useful comments.
journals etiquette
journals etiquette
edited 1 hour ago
henning
19.1k46696
asked 2 hours ago
MoxMox
38418
edited 1 hour ago
henning
19.1k46696
asked 2 hours ago
MoxMox
38418
edited 1 hour ago
henning
19.1k46696
edited 1 hour ago
henning
19.1k46696
edited 1 hour ago
henning
19.1k46696
19.1k46696
asked 2 hours ago
MoxMox
38418
asked 2 hours ago
MoxMox
38418
asked 2 hours ago
MoxMox
38418
38418
4 months doesn't seem that long to me, but it really depends on your field. But not knowing the journal's review process (do they send it to three people initially? Or does the editor include themself as a reviewer?) it's hard to say much more.
– guifa
1 hour ago
7
This sounds like a rant, not a genuine question.
– YiFan
1 hour ago
1
Could it be that the reviewer isn't a native speaker?
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
It is normal to be angry. You have worked hard on the paper and expected the same level of care. Unfortunately, some times, this doesn't happen. It may be due to the topic area as opposed to the journal. Indeed, some times it is the editor! he/she may be lazy or too busy. Move on.
– Prof. Santa Claus
1 hour ago
add a comment |
4 months doesn't seem that long to me, but it really depends on your field. But not knowing the journal's review process (do they send it to three people initially? Or does the editor include themself as a reviewer?) it's hard to say much more.
– guifa
1 hour ago
7
This sounds like a rant, not a genuine question.
– YiFan
1 hour ago
1
Could it be that the reviewer isn't a native speaker?
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
It is normal to be angry. You have worked hard on the paper and expected the same level of care. Unfortunately, some times, this doesn't happen. It may be due to the topic area as opposed to the journal. Indeed, some times it is the editor! he/she may be lazy or too busy. Move on.
– Prof. Santa Claus
1 hour ago
4 months doesn't seem that long to me, but it really depends on your field. But not knowing the journal's review process (do they send it to three people initially? Or does the editor include themself as a reviewer?) it's hard to say much more.
– guifa
1 hour ago
4 months doesn't seem that long to me, but it really depends on your field. But not knowing the journal's review process (do they send it to three people initially? Or does the editor include themself as a reviewer?) it's hard to say much more.
– guifa
1 hour ago
7
7
This sounds like a rant, not a genuine question.
– YiFan
1 hour ago
This sounds like a rant, not a genuine question.
– YiFan
1 hour ago
1
1
Could it be that the reviewer isn't a native speaker?
– Buffy
1 hour ago
Could it be that the reviewer isn't a native speaker?
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
2
It is normal to be angry. You have worked hard on the paper and expected the same level of care. Unfortunately, some times, this doesn't happen. It may be due to the topic area as opposed to the journal. Indeed, some times it is the editor! he/she may be lazy or too busy. Move on.
– Prof. Santa Claus
1 hour ago
It is normal to be angry. You have worked hard on the paper and expected the same level of care. Unfortunately, some times, this doesn't happen. It may be due to the topic area as opposed to the journal. Indeed, some times it is the editor! he/she may be lazy or too busy. Move on.
– Prof. Santa Claus
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If the journal is available in print, a matchbook should do.
Make sure there are not any current burning restrictions in your locale due to drought or otherwise, keep the burning outdoors and away from neighboring structures, and use a suitable non-flammable surround such as a metal firepit or ring of stones. Have a little ceremony, and keep in attendance until the embers are cool. Have a pint if that's your fancy, or whatever sort of morsel you like to treat yourself to.
Hopefully after this time, you've had a bit of time to let emotions taper a little bit and you can refocus yourself to doing what you need to do to submit the work to another journal, either as-is or preferably with some edits that take into account any useful feedback you are able to extract from the review you got. Perhaps solicit some feedback from people in your field that you know personally and trust to be honest so you can improve your chances with your next submission.
Rejection is frustrating but normal. Rejection for bad reasons is more frustrating but just as normal. Hopefully you'll have better success next time around, until then, know you aren't alone and that you will have trouble finding an experienced academic who can't share a similar story.
answered 1 hour ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
16.2k34569
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128029%2fwhat-can-i-do-to-burn-a-journal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If the journal is available in print, a matchbook should do.
Make sure there are not any current burning restrictions in your locale due to drought or otherwise, keep the burning outdoors and away from neighboring structures, and use a suitable non-flammable surround such as a metal firepit or ring of stones. Have a little ceremony, and keep in attendance until the embers are cool. Have a pint if that's your fancy, or whatever sort of morsel you like to treat yourself to.
Hopefully after this time, you've had a bit of time to let emotions taper a little bit and you can refocus yourself to doing what you need to do to submit the work to another journal, either as-is or preferably with some edits that take into account any useful feedback you are able to extract from the review you got. Perhaps solicit some feedback from people in your field that you know personally and trust to be honest so you can improve your chances with your next submission.
Rejection is frustrating but normal. Rejection for bad reasons is more frustrating but just as normal. Hopefully you'll have better success next time around, until then, know you aren't alone and that you will have trouble finding an experienced academic who can't share a similar story.
answered 1 hour ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
16.2k34569
add a comment |
If the journal is available in print, a matchbook should do.
Make sure there are not any current burning restrictions in your locale due to drought or otherwise, keep the burning outdoors and away from neighboring structures, and use a suitable non-flammable surround such as a metal firepit or ring of stones. Have a little ceremony, and keep in attendance until the embers are cool. Have a pint if that's your fancy, or whatever sort of morsel you like to treat yourself to.
Hopefully after this time, you've had a bit of time to let emotions taper a little bit and you can refocus yourself to doing what you need to do to submit the work to another journal, either as-is or preferably with some edits that take into account any useful feedback you are able to extract from the review you got. Perhaps solicit some feedback from people in your field that you know personally and trust to be honest so you can improve your chances with your next submission.
Rejection is frustrating but normal. Rejection for bad reasons is more frustrating but just as normal. Hopefully you'll have better success next time around, until then, know you aren't alone and that you will have trouble finding an experienced academic who can't share a similar story.
answered 1 hour ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
16.2k34569
add a comment |
If the journal is available in print, a matchbook should do.
Make sure there are not any current burning restrictions in your locale due to drought or otherwise, keep the burning outdoors and away from neighboring structures, and use a suitable non-flammable surround such as a metal firepit or ring of stones. Have a little ceremony, and keep in attendance until the embers are cool. Have a pint if that's your fancy, or whatever sort of morsel you like to treat yourself to.
Hopefully after this time, you've had a bit of time to let emotions taper a little bit and you can refocus yourself to doing what you need to do to submit the work to another journal, either as-is or preferably with some edits that take into account any useful feedback you are able to extract from the review you got. Perhaps solicit some feedback from people in your field that you know personally and trust to be honest so you can improve your chances with your next submission.
Rejection is frustrating but normal. Rejection for bad reasons is more frustrating but just as normal. Hopefully you'll have better success next time around, until then, know you aren't alone and that you will have trouble finding an experienced academic who can't share a similar story.
answered 1 hour ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
16.2k34569
If the journal is available in print, a matchbook should do.
Make sure there are not any current burning restrictions in your locale due to drought or otherwise, keep the burning outdoors and away from neighboring structures, and use a suitable non-flammable surround such as a metal firepit or ring of stones. Have a little ceremony, and keep in attendance until the embers are cool. Have a pint if that's your fancy, or whatever sort of morsel you like to treat yourself to.
Hopefully after this time, you've had a bit of time to let emotions taper a little bit and you can refocus yourself to doing what you need to do to submit the work to another journal, either as-is or preferably with some edits that take into account any useful feedback you are able to extract from the review you got. Perhaps solicit some feedback from people in your field that you know personally and trust to be honest so you can improve your chances with your next submission.
Rejection is frustrating but normal. Rejection for bad reasons is more frustrating but just as normal. Hopefully you'll have better success next time around, until then, know you aren't alone and that you will have trouble finding an experienced academic who can't share a similar story.
answered 1 hour ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
16.2k34569
answered 1 hour ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
16.2k34569
answered 1 hour ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
16.2k34569
answered 1 hour ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
16.2k34569
16.2k34569
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128029%2fwhat-can-i-do-to-burn-a-journal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4 months doesn't seem that long to me, but it really depends on your field. But not knowing the journal's review process (do they send it to three people initially? Or does the editor include themself as a reviewer?) it's hard to say much more.
– guifa
1 hour ago
7
This sounds like a rant, not a genuine question.
– YiFan
1 hour ago
1
Could it be that the reviewer isn't a native speaker?
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
It is normal to be angry. You have worked hard on the paper and expected the same level of care. Unfortunately, some times, this doesn't happen. It may be due to the topic area as opposed to the journal. Indeed, some times it is the editor! he/she may be lazy or too busy. Move on.
– Prof. Santa Claus
1 hour ago