Mryntu

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Word for: a synonym with a positive connotation?

different output for groups and groups USERNAME after adding a username to a group

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Categorical vs continuous feature selection/engineering

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

What is the padding with red substance inside of steak packaging?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Can each chord in a progression create its own key?

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Define a list range inside a list

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

What aspect of planet earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

How to create a folder symlink that has a different name?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

1

1

I want to create a symlink

~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log

When I run

ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs

I get a symlink

~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log

which is not what I want.

I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.

symlink ln

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦

141k17263439

asked 4 hours ago

ptkvskptkvsk

1062

New contributor

ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

1

1

I want to create a symlink

~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log

When I run

ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs

I get a symlink

~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log

which is not what I want.

I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.

symlink ln

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦

141k17263439

asked 4 hours ago

ptkvskptkvsk

1062

New contributor

ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

I want to create a symlink

~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log

When I run

ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs

I get a symlink

~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log

which is not what I want.

I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.

symlink ln

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦

141k17263439

asked 4 hours ago

ptkvskptkvsk

1062

New contributor

ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log

ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs

~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦

141k17263439

asked 4 hours ago

ptkvskptkvsk

1062

New contributor

ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦

141k17263439

asked 4 hours ago

ptkvskptkvsk

1062

New contributor

ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦

141k17263439

edited 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦

141k17263439

asked 4 hours ago

ptkvskptkvsk

1062

New contributor

ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 4 hours ago

ptkvskptkvsk

1062

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

3

You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.

Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦Kusalananda

141k17263439

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
  
  – ptkvsk
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.
  
  – Kusalananda♦
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
  
  – 0xSheepdog
  3 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

XrXcaXrXca

813

add a comment | 

0

As other answers say, there is already a directory there.

To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).

From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).

 ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
 ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)

Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).

In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

12.4k52662

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f512139%2fhow-to-create-a-folder-symlink-that-has-a-different-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.

Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦Kusalananda

141k17263439

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
  
  – ptkvsk
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.
  
  – Kusalananda♦
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
  
  – 0xSheepdog
  3 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.

Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦Kusalananda

141k17263439

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
  
  – ptkvsk
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.
  
  – Kusalananda♦
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
  
  – 0xSheepdog
  3 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.

Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦Kusalananda

141k17263439

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦Kusalananda

141k17263439

answered 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦Kusalananda

141k17263439

answered 4 hours ago

Kusalananda♦Kusalananda

141k17263439

1

Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

XrXcaXrXca

813

add a comment | 

1

Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

XrXcaXrXca

813

add a comment | 

Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

XrXcaXrXca

813

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

XrXcaXrXca

813

answered 4 hours ago

XrXcaXrXca

813

answered 4 hours ago

XrXcaXrXca

813

0

As other answers say, there is already a directory there.

To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).

From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).

 ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
 ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)

Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).

In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

12.4k52662

add a comment | 

0

As other answers say, there is already a directory there.

To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).

From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).

 ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
 ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)

Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).

In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

12.4k52662

add a comment | 

As other answers say, there is already a directory there.

To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).

From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).

 ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
 ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)

Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).

In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

12.4k52662

 ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
 ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
 ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

12.4k52662

answered 1 hour ago

ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

12.4k52662

answered 1 hour ago

ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

12.4k52662