Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?Does Absorb Elements give you resistance to damage from the triggering attack?Does the extra damage from Booming Blade stack if the spell is cast twice on the same target?Is a melee spell attack also a melee attack?Do you still make saving throws for half when benefiting from Absorb Elements?If Wracking Touch applies multiple times on the same attack, does that mean the sneak attack damage is dealt multiple times as well?After using absorb elements, will melee spell attacks grant the extra damage from absorb elements?Does the movement from Infestation count as willing?Does the Absorb Elements spell combine with a sorcerer's Distant Spell metamagic option?Is it possible to stack the damage done by the Absorb Elements spell?If a single attack does multiple types of damage, which type does the Absorb Elements spell give resistance to?
Negative Resistance
Multiple options vs single option UI
Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?
Nails holding drywall
Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?
Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?
Should the Product Owner dictate what info the UI needs to display?
How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile
What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?
What is the term for a person whose job is to place products on shelves in stores?
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Creating a chemical industry without petroleum
Is there any pythonic way to find average of specific tuple elements in array?
Where was the County of Thurn und Taxis located?
Older movie/show about humans on derelict alien warship which refuels by passing through a star
A faster way to compute the largest prime factor
Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department
"My boss was furious with me and I have been fired" vs. "My boss was furious with me and I was fired"
How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?
The weakest link
What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?
std::unique_ptr of base class holding reference of derived class does not show warning in gcc compiler while naked pointer shows it. Why?
Island of Knights, Knaves and Spies
`microtype`: Set Minimum Width of a Space
Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?
Does Absorb Elements give you resistance to damage from the triggering attack?Does the extra damage from Booming Blade stack if the spell is cast twice on the same target?Is a melee spell attack also a melee attack?Do you still make saving throws for half when benefiting from Absorb Elements?If Wracking Touch applies multiple times on the same attack, does that mean the sneak attack damage is dealt multiple times as well?After using absorb elements, will melee spell attacks grant the extra damage from absorb elements?Does the movement from Infestation count as willing?Does the Absorb Elements spell combine with a sorcerer's Distant Spell metamagic option?Is it possible to stack the damage done by the Absorb Elements spell?If a single attack does multiple types of damage, which type does the Absorb Elements spell give resistance to?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The description of the absorb elements spell says:
The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. [...] Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.
The irst line says "next melee attack". Later, it says "next turn". Which is it?
Let's say I use my movement to jump into a bonfire, use my reaction to cast absorb elements, and use the rest of my movement to get up to the enemy and attack him, all in the same turn. Does my attack have the extra elemental damage?
Does absorb elements apply to your next attack or does it have to be on your next turn?
dnd-5e spells
edited 24 mins ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 2 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7182921
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description of the absorb elements spell says:
The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. [...] Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.
The irst line says "next melee attack". Later, it says "next turn". Which is it?
Let's say I use my movement to jump into a bonfire, use my reaction to cast absorb elements, and use the rest of my movement to get up to the enemy and attack him, all in the same turn. Does my attack have the extra elemental damage?
Does absorb elements apply to your next attack or does it have to be on your next turn?
dnd-5e spells
edited 24 mins ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 2 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7182921
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description of the absorb elements spell says:
The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. [...] Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.
The irst line says "next melee attack". Later, it says "next turn". Which is it?
Let's say I use my movement to jump into a bonfire, use my reaction to cast absorb elements, and use the rest of my movement to get up to the enemy and attack him, all in the same turn. Does my attack have the extra elemental damage?
Does absorb elements apply to your next attack or does it have to be on your next turn?
dnd-5e spells
edited 24 mins ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 2 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7182921
$endgroup$
The description of the absorb elements spell says:
The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. [...] Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.
The irst line says "next melee attack". Later, it says "next turn". Which is it?
Let's say I use my movement to jump into a bonfire, use my reaction to cast absorb elements, and use the rest of my movement to get up to the enemy and attack him, all in the same turn. Does my attack have the extra elemental damage?
Does absorb elements apply to your next attack or does it have to be on your next turn?
dnd-5e spells
dnd-5e spells
edited 24 mins ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 2 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7182921
edited 24 mins ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 2 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7182921
edited 24 mins ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
edited 24 mins ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
edited 24 mins ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
27.8k598169
asked 2 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7182921
asked 2 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7182921
asked 2 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7182921
7182921
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 1 hour ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose Yup, addressed that now :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146849%2fdoes-the-damage-from-the-absorb-elements-spell-apply-to-your-next-attack-or-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 1 hour ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose Yup, addressed that now :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 1 hour ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose Yup, addressed that now :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 1 hour ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
$endgroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 1 hour ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
answered 1 hour ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
answered 1 hour ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
63k9229416
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose Yup, addressed that now :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose Yup, addressed that now :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
5
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose Yup, addressed that now :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose Yup, addressed that now :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146849%2fdoes-the-damage-from-the-absorb-elements-spell-apply-to-your-next-attack-or-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
