Does every subgroup of an abelian group have to be abelian? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraA condition for a subgroup of a finitely generated free abelian group to have finite indexAdditive non-abelian group?Galois Group, Field Extension Prove AbelianCommutator subgroup is the minimal normal subgroup such that quotient group is abelianShowing that every subgroup of an abelian group is normalevery subgroup of the quaternion group is normalQuotient Group $D_2n/R$ is abelian where $R$ is the group of rotations?Proving a subgroup of a Galois group is normalNormal Subgroup of Galois GroupFaithful group action and Galois correspondence

Could a cockatrice have parasitic embryos?

Will I lose my paid in full property

Mechanism of the formation of peracetic acid

What's parked in Mil Moscow helicopter plant?

Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?

Are there existing rules/lore for MTG planeswalkers?

How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?

Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class?

Determinant of a matrix with 2 equal rows

What is the numbering system used for the DSN dishes?

What is /etc/mtab in Linux?

What to do with someone that cheated their way though university and a PhD program?

How would it unbalance gameplay to rule that Weapon Master allows for picking a fighting style?

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

Where to find documentation for `whois` command options?

Where did Arya get these scars?

When speaking, how do you change your mind mid-sentence?

Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

Page Layouts : 1 column , 2 columns-left , 2 columns-right , 3 column

What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?

In search of the origins of term censor, I hit a dead end stuck with the greek term, to censor, λογοκρίνω



Does every subgroup of an abelian group have to be abelian?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraA condition for a subgroup of a finitely generated free abelian group to have finite indexAdditive non-abelian group?Galois Group, Field Extension Prove AbelianCommutator subgroup is the minimal normal subgroup such that quotient group is abelianShowing that every subgroup of an abelian group is normalevery subgroup of the quaternion group is normalQuotient Group $D_2n/R$ is abelian where $R$ is the group of rotations?Proving a subgroup of a Galois group is normalNormal Subgroup of Galois GroupFaithful group action and Galois correspondence










4












$begingroup$


My original problem is to show that E/L is an abelian extension over L and L/F is an abelian extension over F, given that E/F is an abelian extension over F and that L is a normal extension of F such that $Fsubseteq L subseteq E$.



So far I have proved that E is a normal extension of F, E is a normal extension of L, and L is a normal extension of F. I know that to prove abelian extension I must also prove that Gal(E/L) is an abelian group. I have shown that Gal(E/L) $subseteq$ Gal (E/F). In my mind it makes sense that I cannot lose commutativity therefore my subgroup must be Abelian too. How do I show this in a proof? Is it enough to show two elements in the subgroup must also exist in the larger group and that they must be commutative in the larger group? I feel like I know what needs to be done, just not how to phrase it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    My original problem is to show that E/L is an abelian extension over L and L/F is an abelian extension over F, given that E/F is an abelian extension over F and that L is a normal extension of F such that $Fsubseteq L subseteq E$.



    So far I have proved that E is a normal extension of F, E is a normal extension of L, and L is a normal extension of F. I know that to prove abelian extension I must also prove that Gal(E/L) is an abelian group. I have shown that Gal(E/L) $subseteq$ Gal (E/F). In my mind it makes sense that I cannot lose commutativity therefore my subgroup must be Abelian too. How do I show this in a proof? Is it enough to show two elements in the subgroup must also exist in the larger group and that they must be commutative in the larger group? I feel like I know what needs to be done, just not how to phrase it.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      My original problem is to show that E/L is an abelian extension over L and L/F is an abelian extension over F, given that E/F is an abelian extension over F and that L is a normal extension of F such that $Fsubseteq L subseteq E$.



      So far I have proved that E is a normal extension of F, E is a normal extension of L, and L is a normal extension of F. I know that to prove abelian extension I must also prove that Gal(E/L) is an abelian group. I have shown that Gal(E/L) $subseteq$ Gal (E/F). In my mind it makes sense that I cannot lose commutativity therefore my subgroup must be Abelian too. How do I show this in a proof? Is it enough to show two elements in the subgroup must also exist in the larger group and that they must be commutative in the larger group? I feel like I know what needs to be done, just not how to phrase it.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My original problem is to show that E/L is an abelian extension over L and L/F is an abelian extension over F, given that E/F is an abelian extension over F and that L is a normal extension of F such that $Fsubseteq L subseteq E$.



      So far I have proved that E is a normal extension of F, E is a normal extension of L, and L is a normal extension of F. I know that to prove abelian extension I must also prove that Gal(E/L) is an abelian group. I have shown that Gal(E/L) $subseteq$ Gal (E/F). In my mind it makes sense that I cannot lose commutativity therefore my subgroup must be Abelian too. How do I show this in a proof? Is it enough to show two elements in the subgroup must also exist in the larger group and that they must be commutative in the larger group? I feel like I know what needs to be done, just not how to phrase it.







      abstract-algebra group-theory galois-theory abelian-groups






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      J. W. Tanner

      5,1651520




      5,1651520










      asked 6 hours ago









      MT mathMT math

      303




      303




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



          Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



          Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
            $endgroup$
            – MT math
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            4 hours ago


















          2












          $begingroup$

          If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3198960%2fdoes-every-subgroup-of-an-abelian-group-have-to-be-abelian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



            Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



            Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
              $endgroup$
              – MT math
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe so, yes.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              4 hours ago















            4












            $begingroup$

            Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



            Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



            Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
              $endgroup$
              – MT math
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe so, yes.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              4 hours ago













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



            Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



            Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



            Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



            Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

            10.8k31843




            10.8k31843











            • $begingroup$
              can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
              $endgroup$
              – MT math
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe so, yes.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              4 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
              $endgroup$
              – MT math
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe so, yes.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              4 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
            $endgroup$
            – MT math
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
            $endgroup$
            – MT math
            6 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            4 hours ago











            2












            $begingroup$

            If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 6 hours ago









                Matt SamuelMatt Samuel

                39.5k63870




                39.5k63870



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3198960%2fdoes-every-subgroup-of-an-abelian-group-have-to-be-abelian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can not update quote_id field of “quote_item” table magento 2Magento 2.1 - We can't remove the item. (Shopping Cart doesnt allow us to remove items before becomes empty)Add value for custom quote item attribute using REST apiREST API endpoint v1/carts/cartId/items always returns error messageCorrect way to save entries to databaseHow to remove all associated quote objects of a customer completelyMagento 2 - Save value from custom input field to quote_itemGet quote_item data using quote id and product id filter in Magento 2How to set additional data to quote_item table from controller in Magento 2?What is the purpose of additional_data column in quote_item table in magento2Set Custom Price to Quote item magento2 from controller

                    How to solve knockout JS error in Magento 2 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?(Magento2) knockout.js:3012 Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process bindingUnable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Cannot read property `scopeLabel` of undefined on Product Detail PageCan't get Customer Data on frontend in Magento 2Magento2 Order Summary - unable to process bindingKO templates are not loading in Magento 2.1 applicationgetting knockout js error magento 2Product grid not load -— Unable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Product form not loaded in magento2Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process binding “if: function()return (isShowLegend()) ” magento 2

                    Nissan Patrol Зміст Перше покоління — 4W60 (1951-1960) | Друге покоління — 60 series (1960-1980) | Третє покоління (1980–2002) | Четверте покоління — Y60 (1987–1998) | П'яте покоління — Y61 (1997–2013) | Шосте покоління — Y62 (2010- ) | Посилання | Зноски | Навігаційне менюОфіційний український сайтТест-драйв Nissan Patrol 2010 7-го поколінняNissan PatrolКак мы тестировали Nissan Patrol 2016рвиправивши або дописавши її