Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?2019 Community Moderator ElectionBirth is empty on ext4Can I set the “Archive” bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?Can I configure my Linux system for more aggressive file system caching?Which Linux file systems for USB sticks?what is inode for, in FreeBSD or SolarisHow to interact with the concrete file system?file system, archive bitDoes Linux uses the device files for the HDD partitions to access the HDD?Is the Virtual File System (VFS) a program or is it just an interface?How do I format an internal hard drive so that FreeBSD, Linux and Windows can all access it?How does memory mapping a file have significant performance increases over the standard I/O system calls?What is responsible for file permissions in a linux system?
What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?
Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?
Co-worker team leader wants to inject the crap software product of his friends into our development. What should I say to our common boss?
Can someone explain this Mudra being done by Ramakrishna Paramhansa in Samadhi?
Is it ok to include an epilogue dedicated to colleagues who passed away in the end of the manuscript?
Question about partial fractions with irreducible quadratic factors
When were linguistics departments first established
Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?
"However" used in a conditional clause?
US to Europe trip with Canada layover- is 52 minutes enough?
Is King K. Rool's down throw to up-special a true combo?
Playing ONE triplet (not three)
What exactly is the purpose of connection links straped between the rocket and the launch pad
What wound would be of little consequence to a biped but terrible for a quadruped?
Touchscreen-controlled dentist office snowman collector game
What to do when during a meeting client people start to fight (even physically) with each others?
Why does Deadpool say "You're welcome, Canada," after shooting Ryan Reynolds in the end credits?
How to make readers know that my work has used a hidden constraint?
What is the definition of "Natural Selection"?
Make a transparent 448*448 image
Force user to remove USB token
Time dilation for a moving electronic clock
"One can do his homework in the library"
Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
2019 Community Moderator ElectionBirth is empty on ext4Can I set the “Archive” bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?Can I configure my Linux system for more aggressive file system caching?Which Linux file systems for USB sticks?what is inode for, in FreeBSD or SolarisHow to interact with the concrete file system?file system, archive bitDoes Linux uses the device files for the HDD partitions to access the HDD?Is the Virtual File System (VFS) a program or is it just an interface?How do I format an internal hard drive so that FreeBSD, Linux and Windows can all access it?How does memory mapping a file have significant performance increases over the standard I/O system calls?What is responsible for file permissions in a linux system?
Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).
The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:
So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.
Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).
Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.
But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
linux filesystems
asked 4 hours ago
user341642user341642
311
New contributor
user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).
The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:
So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.
Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).
Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.
But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
linux filesystems
asked 4 hours ago
user341642user341642
311
New contributor
user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).
The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:
So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.
Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).
Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.
But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
linux filesystems
asked 4 hours ago
user341642user341642
311
New contributor
user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).
The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:
So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.
Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).
Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.
But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
linux filesystems
linux filesystems
asked 4 hours ago
user341642user341642
311
New contributor
user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
user341642user341642
311
New contributor
user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
user341642user341642
311
New contributor
user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
user341642user341642
311
asked 4 hours ago
user341642user341642
311
311
New contributor
user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
answered 4 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
61.2k1099175
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
4 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
4 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506160%2fdoes-linux-have-system-calls-to-access-all-the-features-of-the-file-systems-it-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
answered 4 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
61.2k1099175
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
4 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
4 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
4 hours ago
add a comment |
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
answered 4 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
61.2k1099175
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
4 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
4 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
4 hours ago
add a comment |
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
answered 4 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
61.2k1099175
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
answered 4 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
61.2k1099175
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
61.2k1099175
answered 4 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
61.2k1099175
answered 4 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
61.2k1099175
61.2k1099175
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
4 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
4 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
4 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
4 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
4 hours ago
2
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
4 hours ago
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
4 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of
statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.– Stephen Kitt
4 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of
statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.– Stephen Kitt
4 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
4 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
4 hours ago
add a comment |
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506160%2fdoes-linux-have-system-calls-to-access-all-the-features-of-the-file-systems-it-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
