Continuity of Linear Operator Between Hilbert SpacesNorm of adjoint operator in Hilbert spaceSesquilinear forms on Hilbert spacesGradient of inner product in Hilbert spaceDissipativity for Hilbert spacesA self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert spaceComplementary slackness in Hilbert spacesProof that every bounded linear operator between hilbert spaces has an adjoint.Proof explanation related to the operator matricesShowing that $exists x in H : |A(x)| = |A|_mathcalL$ if $H$ is Hilbert and $A in mathcalL_c(X,Y)$.Why is this operator symmetric? A question concerning a paper from Brezis and Crandall

PTIJ: Who should I vote for? (21st Knesset Edition)

Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?

How to read the value of this capacitor?

What should tie a collection of short-stories together?

The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」

Can a druid choose the size of its wild shape beast?

Define, (actually define) the "stability" and "energy" of a compound

How to create the Curved texte?

Identifying the interval from A♭ to D♯

how to write formula in word in latex

Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?

How to make healing in an exploration game interesting

Most cost effective thermostat setting: consistent temperature vs. lowest temperature possible

Interplanetary conflict, some disease destroys the ability to understand or appreciate music

Existence of subset with given Hausdorff dimension

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

A Cautionary Suggestion

My adviser wants to be the first author

Error in Twin Prime Conjecture

What do Xenomorphs eat in the Alien series?

Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

Can I use USB data pins as power source

Gravity magic - How does it work?



Continuity of Linear Operator Between Hilbert Spaces


Norm of adjoint operator in Hilbert spaceSesquilinear forms on Hilbert spacesGradient of inner product in Hilbert spaceDissipativity for Hilbert spacesA self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert spaceComplementary slackness in Hilbert spacesProof that every bounded linear operator between hilbert spaces has an adjoint.Proof explanation related to the operator matricesShowing that $exists x in H : |A(x)| = |A|_mathcalL$ if $H$ is Hilbert and $A in mathcalL_c(X,Y)$.Why is this operator symmetric? A question concerning a paper from Brezis and Crandall













2












$begingroup$



Note: Please do not give a solution; I am curious to understand why my solution is incorrect, and would prefer guidance to help me complete the question myself. Thank you.





Let $mathcalH$ be a Hilbert space, and suppose that $TintextHom(mathcalH,mathcalH)$. Suppose that there exists an operator $tildeT:mathcalHrightarrowmathcalH$ such that,
beginalign
langle Tx,yrangle =langle x,tildeTyrangle,
endalign

$forall x,yinmathcalH$. Show that $T$ is continuous.



My current solution is as follows:



Assume for all $delta>0$ there exists $n>NinmathbbN$ such that,
beginalign
|x_n-x|<delta.
endalign

Then,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle &= |Tx_n-Tx|^2\
&leq|Tx_n-Tx|=|T(x_n-x)|\
&leq|T||x_n-x|rightarrow 0text as nrightarrowinfty.
endalign



What am I doing wrong? I notice I do not use the existence of $tildeT$.



Second Attempt:



Assume $langle x_n,xrangle rightarrow langle x,xrangle$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Then, given $langle Tx,yrangle = langle x,tildeTyrangle$,
beginalign
langle Tx_n,yrangle &= langle x_n,tildeTyranglerightarrow_nrightarrowinftylangle x,tildeTyrangle=langle Tx,yrangle.
endalign

Therefore, $Tx_nrightarrow Tx$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.



Third Attempt:



Assume $|x_n-x|rightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Then,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle=langle x_n-x,x_n-xrangle=|x_n-x|^2.
endalign



By assumption $|x_n-x|^2rightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Hence,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle = |Tx_n-Tx|^2rightarrow 0text as nrightarrowinfty.
endalign

Therefore, $T$ is continuous.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The last inequality basically implies that the norm of T is bounded or that it is continuous
    $endgroup$
    – Andres Mejia
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Comment on the second attempt: you showed that $Tx_n to Tx$ weakly, not in norm. Off-topic comment: I admire your tenacity. Keep trying!
    $endgroup$
    – Umberto P.
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Do you have a hint?
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Third attempt made. Although not sure if this holds either.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    3 hours ago















2












$begingroup$



Note: Please do not give a solution; I am curious to understand why my solution is incorrect, and would prefer guidance to help me complete the question myself. Thank you.





Let $mathcalH$ be a Hilbert space, and suppose that $TintextHom(mathcalH,mathcalH)$. Suppose that there exists an operator $tildeT:mathcalHrightarrowmathcalH$ such that,
beginalign
langle Tx,yrangle =langle x,tildeTyrangle,
endalign

$forall x,yinmathcalH$. Show that $T$ is continuous.



My current solution is as follows:



Assume for all $delta>0$ there exists $n>NinmathbbN$ such that,
beginalign
|x_n-x|<delta.
endalign

Then,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle &= |Tx_n-Tx|^2\
&leq|Tx_n-Tx|=|T(x_n-x)|\
&leq|T||x_n-x|rightarrow 0text as nrightarrowinfty.
endalign



What am I doing wrong? I notice I do not use the existence of $tildeT$.



Second Attempt:



Assume $langle x_n,xrangle rightarrow langle x,xrangle$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Then, given $langle Tx,yrangle = langle x,tildeTyrangle$,
beginalign
langle Tx_n,yrangle &= langle x_n,tildeTyranglerightarrow_nrightarrowinftylangle x,tildeTyrangle=langle Tx,yrangle.
endalign

Therefore, $Tx_nrightarrow Tx$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.



Third Attempt:



Assume $|x_n-x|rightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Then,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle=langle x_n-x,x_n-xrangle=|x_n-x|^2.
endalign



By assumption $|x_n-x|^2rightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Hence,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle = |Tx_n-Tx|^2rightarrow 0text as nrightarrowinfty.
endalign

Therefore, $T$ is continuous.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The last inequality basically implies that the norm of T is bounded or that it is continuous
    $endgroup$
    – Andres Mejia
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Comment on the second attempt: you showed that $Tx_n to Tx$ weakly, not in norm. Off-topic comment: I admire your tenacity. Keep trying!
    $endgroup$
    – Umberto P.
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Do you have a hint?
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Third attempt made. Although not sure if this holds either.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    3 hours ago













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$



Note: Please do not give a solution; I am curious to understand why my solution is incorrect, and would prefer guidance to help me complete the question myself. Thank you.





Let $mathcalH$ be a Hilbert space, and suppose that $TintextHom(mathcalH,mathcalH)$. Suppose that there exists an operator $tildeT:mathcalHrightarrowmathcalH$ such that,
beginalign
langle Tx,yrangle =langle x,tildeTyrangle,
endalign

$forall x,yinmathcalH$. Show that $T$ is continuous.



My current solution is as follows:



Assume for all $delta>0$ there exists $n>NinmathbbN$ such that,
beginalign
|x_n-x|<delta.
endalign

Then,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle &= |Tx_n-Tx|^2\
&leq|Tx_n-Tx|=|T(x_n-x)|\
&leq|T||x_n-x|rightarrow 0text as nrightarrowinfty.
endalign



What am I doing wrong? I notice I do not use the existence of $tildeT$.



Second Attempt:



Assume $langle x_n,xrangle rightarrow langle x,xrangle$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Then, given $langle Tx,yrangle = langle x,tildeTyrangle$,
beginalign
langle Tx_n,yrangle &= langle x_n,tildeTyranglerightarrow_nrightarrowinftylangle x,tildeTyrangle=langle Tx,yrangle.
endalign

Therefore, $Tx_nrightarrow Tx$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.



Third Attempt:



Assume $|x_n-x|rightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Then,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle=langle x_n-x,x_n-xrangle=|x_n-x|^2.
endalign



By assumption $|x_n-x|^2rightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Hence,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle = |Tx_n-Tx|^2rightarrow 0text as nrightarrowinfty.
endalign

Therefore, $T$ is continuous.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Note: Please do not give a solution; I am curious to understand why my solution is incorrect, and would prefer guidance to help me complete the question myself. Thank you.





Let $mathcalH$ be a Hilbert space, and suppose that $TintextHom(mathcalH,mathcalH)$. Suppose that there exists an operator $tildeT:mathcalHrightarrowmathcalH$ such that,
beginalign
langle Tx,yrangle =langle x,tildeTyrangle,
endalign

$forall x,yinmathcalH$. Show that $T$ is continuous.



My current solution is as follows:



Assume for all $delta>0$ there exists $n>NinmathbbN$ such that,
beginalign
|x_n-x|<delta.
endalign

Then,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle &= |Tx_n-Tx|^2\
&leq|Tx_n-Tx|=|T(x_n-x)|\
&leq|T||x_n-x|rightarrow 0text as nrightarrowinfty.
endalign



What am I doing wrong? I notice I do not use the existence of $tildeT$.



Second Attempt:



Assume $langle x_n,xrangle rightarrow langle x,xrangle$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Then, given $langle Tx,yrangle = langle x,tildeTyrangle$,
beginalign
langle Tx_n,yrangle &= langle x_n,tildeTyranglerightarrow_nrightarrowinftylangle x,tildeTyrangle=langle Tx,yrangle.
endalign

Therefore, $Tx_nrightarrow Tx$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.



Third Attempt:



Assume $|x_n-x|rightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Then,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle=langle x_n-x,x_n-xrangle=|x_n-x|^2.
endalign



By assumption $|x_n-x|^2rightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Hence,
beginalign
langle Tx_n-Tx,Tx_n-Txrangle = |Tx_n-Tx|^2rightarrow 0text as nrightarrowinfty.
endalign

Therefore, $T$ is continuous.







functional-analysis continuity hilbert-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







Jack

















asked 5 hours ago









JackJack

887




887







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The last inequality basically implies that the norm of T is bounded or that it is continuous
    $endgroup$
    – Andres Mejia
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Comment on the second attempt: you showed that $Tx_n to Tx$ weakly, not in norm. Off-topic comment: I admire your tenacity. Keep trying!
    $endgroup$
    – Umberto P.
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Do you have a hint?
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Third attempt made. Although not sure if this holds either.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    3 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The last inequality basically implies that the norm of T is bounded or that it is continuous
    $endgroup$
    – Andres Mejia
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Comment on the second attempt: you showed that $Tx_n to Tx$ weakly, not in norm. Off-topic comment: I admire your tenacity. Keep trying!
    $endgroup$
    – Umberto P.
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Do you have a hint?
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Third attempt made. Although not sure if this holds either.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    3 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
The last inequality basically implies that the norm of T is bounded or that it is continuous
$endgroup$
– Andres Mejia
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
The last inequality basically implies that the norm of T is bounded or that it is continuous
$endgroup$
– Andres Mejia
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Comment on the second attempt: you showed that $Tx_n to Tx$ weakly, not in norm. Off-topic comment: I admire your tenacity. Keep trying!
$endgroup$
– Umberto P.
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
Comment on the second attempt: you showed that $Tx_n to Tx$ weakly, not in norm. Off-topic comment: I admire your tenacity. Keep trying!
$endgroup$
– Umberto P.
4 hours ago













$begingroup$
Thank you. Do you have a hint?
$endgroup$
– Jack
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you. Do you have a hint?
$endgroup$
– Jack
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Third attempt made. Although not sure if this holds either.
$endgroup$
– Jack
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Third attempt made. Although not sure if this holds either.
$endgroup$
– Jack
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

The problem is that we can't assume that $T$ has a finite norm. Before we add that condition about having an adjoint map $tildeT$, we're simply assuming that $T$ is a linear map.



In fact, a linear map between normed vector spaces is continuous if and only if it has a finite operator norm. You assumed the statement we were trying to prove.



Second attempt: The assumption here should have been that $x_nto x$, as in the others. Then, yes, $langle Tx_n,yrangle to langle Tx,yrangle$ for each $y$. This is real progress. But, as stated in the comments, it's weak convergence rather than convergence in norm. Not quite there.



Third attempt: No, $langle Tu,Turangle$ is not equal to $langle u,urangle$ - it's equal to $langle u,tildeTTurangle$, and you don't know what $tildeTT$ does. This is not helpful.



All, right, lets go back to the attempt that made some progress. Are you familiar with the uniform boundedness principle? One consequence of that theorem is that any sequence of points in a Hilbert space that converges weakly is bounded. Can we use this to ensure that $T$ is a bounded operator?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So is the idea for me to use $tildeT$ to cancel out the operator norm in my final inequality?
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Jack no, that won't rescue the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Umberto P.
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    New proof attempt. Please check if you can.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149977%2fcontinuity-of-linear-operator-between-hilbert-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

The problem is that we can't assume that $T$ has a finite norm. Before we add that condition about having an adjoint map $tildeT$, we're simply assuming that $T$ is a linear map.



In fact, a linear map between normed vector spaces is continuous if and only if it has a finite operator norm. You assumed the statement we were trying to prove.



Second attempt: The assumption here should have been that $x_nto x$, as in the others. Then, yes, $langle Tx_n,yrangle to langle Tx,yrangle$ for each $y$. This is real progress. But, as stated in the comments, it's weak convergence rather than convergence in norm. Not quite there.



Third attempt: No, $langle Tu,Turangle$ is not equal to $langle u,urangle$ - it's equal to $langle u,tildeTTurangle$, and you don't know what $tildeTT$ does. This is not helpful.



All, right, lets go back to the attempt that made some progress. Are you familiar with the uniform boundedness principle? One consequence of that theorem is that any sequence of points in a Hilbert space that converges weakly is bounded. Can we use this to ensure that $T$ is a bounded operator?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So is the idea for me to use $tildeT$ to cancel out the operator norm in my final inequality?
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Jack no, that won't rescue the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Umberto P.
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    New proof attempt. Please check if you can.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago















4












$begingroup$

The problem is that we can't assume that $T$ has a finite norm. Before we add that condition about having an adjoint map $tildeT$, we're simply assuming that $T$ is a linear map.



In fact, a linear map between normed vector spaces is continuous if and only if it has a finite operator norm. You assumed the statement we were trying to prove.



Second attempt: The assumption here should have been that $x_nto x$, as in the others. Then, yes, $langle Tx_n,yrangle to langle Tx,yrangle$ for each $y$. This is real progress. But, as stated in the comments, it's weak convergence rather than convergence in norm. Not quite there.



Third attempt: No, $langle Tu,Turangle$ is not equal to $langle u,urangle$ - it's equal to $langle u,tildeTTurangle$, and you don't know what $tildeTT$ does. This is not helpful.



All, right, lets go back to the attempt that made some progress. Are you familiar with the uniform boundedness principle? One consequence of that theorem is that any sequence of points in a Hilbert space that converges weakly is bounded. Can we use this to ensure that $T$ is a bounded operator?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So is the idea for me to use $tildeT$ to cancel out the operator norm in my final inequality?
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Jack no, that won't rescue the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Umberto P.
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    New proof attempt. Please check if you can.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

The problem is that we can't assume that $T$ has a finite norm. Before we add that condition about having an adjoint map $tildeT$, we're simply assuming that $T$ is a linear map.



In fact, a linear map between normed vector spaces is continuous if and only if it has a finite operator norm. You assumed the statement we were trying to prove.



Second attempt: The assumption here should have been that $x_nto x$, as in the others. Then, yes, $langle Tx_n,yrangle to langle Tx,yrangle$ for each $y$. This is real progress. But, as stated in the comments, it's weak convergence rather than convergence in norm. Not quite there.



Third attempt: No, $langle Tu,Turangle$ is not equal to $langle u,urangle$ - it's equal to $langle u,tildeTTurangle$, and you don't know what $tildeTT$ does. This is not helpful.



All, right, lets go back to the attempt that made some progress. Are you familiar with the uniform boundedness principle? One consequence of that theorem is that any sequence of points in a Hilbert space that converges weakly is bounded. Can we use this to ensure that $T$ is a bounded operator?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The problem is that we can't assume that $T$ has a finite norm. Before we add that condition about having an adjoint map $tildeT$, we're simply assuming that $T$ is a linear map.



In fact, a linear map between normed vector spaces is continuous if and only if it has a finite operator norm. You assumed the statement we were trying to prove.



Second attempt: The assumption here should have been that $x_nto x$, as in the others. Then, yes, $langle Tx_n,yrangle to langle Tx,yrangle$ for each $y$. This is real progress. But, as stated in the comments, it's weak convergence rather than convergence in norm. Not quite there.



Third attempt: No, $langle Tu,Turangle$ is not equal to $langle u,urangle$ - it's equal to $langle u,tildeTTurangle$, and you don't know what $tildeTT$ does. This is not helpful.



All, right, lets go back to the attempt that made some progress. Are you familiar with the uniform boundedness principle? One consequence of that theorem is that any sequence of points in a Hilbert space that converges weakly is bounded. Can we use this to ensure that $T$ is a bounded operator?







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









jmerryjmerry

14.3k1629




14.3k1629











  • $begingroup$
    So is the idea for me to use $tildeT$ to cancel out the operator norm in my final inequality?
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Jack no, that won't rescue the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Umberto P.
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    New proof attempt. Please check if you can.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    So is the idea for me to use $tildeT$ to cancel out the operator norm in my final inequality?
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Jack no, that won't rescue the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Umberto P.
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    New proof attempt. Please check if you can.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
So is the idea for me to use $tildeT$ to cancel out the operator norm in my final inequality?
$endgroup$
– Jack
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
So is the idea for me to use $tildeT$ to cancel out the operator norm in my final inequality?
$endgroup$
– Jack
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Jack no, that won't rescue the proof.
$endgroup$
– Umberto P.
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Jack no, that won't rescue the proof.
$endgroup$
– Umberto P.
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
New proof attempt. Please check if you can.
$endgroup$
– Jack
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
New proof attempt. Please check if you can.
$endgroup$
– Jack
4 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149977%2fcontinuity-of-linear-operator-between-hilbert-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can not update quote_id field of “quote_item” table magento 2Magento 2.1 - We can't remove the item. (Shopping Cart doesnt allow us to remove items before becomes empty)Add value for custom quote item attribute using REST apiREST API endpoint v1/carts/cartId/items always returns error messageCorrect way to save entries to databaseHow to remove all associated quote objects of a customer completelyMagento 2 - Save value from custom input field to quote_itemGet quote_item data using quote id and product id filter in Magento 2How to set additional data to quote_item table from controller in Magento 2?What is the purpose of additional_data column in quote_item table in magento2Set Custom Price to Quote item magento2 from controller

How to solve knockout JS error in Magento 2 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?(Magento2) knockout.js:3012 Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process bindingUnable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Cannot read property `scopeLabel` of undefined on Product Detail PageCan't get Customer Data on frontend in Magento 2Magento2 Order Summary - unable to process bindingKO templates are not loading in Magento 2.1 applicationgetting knockout js error magento 2Product grid not load -— Unable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Product form not loaded in magento2Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process binding “if: function()return (isShowLegend()) ” magento 2

Nissan Patrol Зміст Перше покоління — 4W60 (1951-1960) | Друге покоління — 60 series (1960-1980) | Третє покоління (1980–2002) | Четверте покоління — Y60 (1987–1998) | П'яте покоління — Y61 (1997–2013) | Шосте покоління — Y62 (2010- ) | Посилання | Зноски | Навігаційне менюОфіційний український сайтТест-драйв Nissan Patrol 2010 7-го поколінняNissan PatrolКак мы тестировали Nissan Patrol 2016рвиправивши або дописавши її