Unit testing extension method adding view location expander Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Unit testing extension for equality testingCalculate the physical centreAre these the right type of unit tests to write?File validation and unit testingUnit Testing in VBAUnit testing a service to return items from a databaseValidation extensions v2Java REST-assured acceptance testsGenerate pieces of an SQL queryUnit testing a generic interface: proposal to avoid test duplication for different generic types
Can a Beast Master ranger change beast companions?
What does Turing mean by this statement?
Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?
How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?
Would it be easier to apply for a UK visa if there is a host family to sponsor for you in going there?
How to align multiple equations
AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network
What makes a man succeed?
What is an "asse" in Elizabethan English?
Unit testing extension method adding view location expander
Central Vacuuming: Is it worth it, and how does it compare to normal vacuuming?
A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way
How does the math work when buying airline miles?
What order were files/directories output in dir?
C's equality operator on converted pointers
How to write capital alpha?
What is the difference between globalisation and imperialism?
What does this say in Elvish?
Trademark violation for app?
Why we try to capture variability?
How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?
Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?
What is the home of the drow in Flanaess?
Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?
Unit testing extension method adding view location expander
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Unit testing extension for equality testingCalculate the physical centreAre these the right type of unit tests to write?File validation and unit testingUnit Testing in VBAUnit testing a service to return items from a databaseValidation extensions v2Java REST-assured acceptance testsGenerate pieces of an SQL queryUnit testing a generic interface: proposal to avoid test duplication for different generic types
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Introduction
I'm writing unit tests for an extension method I wrote. Its only purpose it is to wrap startup logic which extends ViewLocationExpanders list by an instance implementating IViewLocationExpander. ViewLocationExpanders is a property of RazorViewEngineOptions, which can be configured in application startup in ConfigureServices() method. I'm using XUnit 2.4.1.
Usage
Instead of:
services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>
options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(new ViewLocationExpander());
);
I can use:
services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
ViewLocationExpander
public class ViewLocationExpander : IViewLocationExpander
public IEnumerable<string> ExpandViewLocations(
ViewLocationExpanderContext context,
IEnumerable<string> viewLocations)
if (context == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
if (viewLocations == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocations));
/*
* Note:
* 0 = action name
* 1 = controller name
* 2 = area name
*/
var newViewLocations = new string[]
// Example: '/Views/Home/_Partials/FooBar.cshtml'
"/Views/1/_Partials/0.cshtml",
;
// Add new locations *AFTER* MVC default locations.
return viewLocations.Union(newViewLocations);
public void PopulateValues(ViewLocationExpanderContext context)
context.Values["customviewlocation"] = nameof(ViewLocationExpander);
Extension method
public static IServiceCollection AddViewLocationExpander(
this IServiceCollection services,
IViewLocationExpander viewLocationExpander)
if (services == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));
if (viewLocationExpander == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocationExpander));
return services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>
options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(viewLocationExpander);
);
Unit tests
[Fact]
public void ExtensionMethodAddsNewViewLocationExpander()
// Arrange
var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddMvc();
// These two are required to active the RazorViewEngineOptions.
services.AddSingleton<IHostingEnvironment, HostingEnvironment>();
services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, LoggerFactory>();
// Act
var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var oldOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var newOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
// Assert
Assert.True(newOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count > oldOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count);
Questions
- Am I going beyond the scope of what unit testing should include? I'm afraid that my code is actually testing the basic functions of generic collections and/or aspects of ASP.NET Core.
- If my concern above is true, that should I write unit tests to this at all? How should it work?
c# unit-testing asp.net-core
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Introduction
I'm writing unit tests for an extension method I wrote. Its only purpose it is to wrap startup logic which extends ViewLocationExpanders list by an instance implementating IViewLocationExpander. ViewLocationExpanders is a property of RazorViewEngineOptions, which can be configured in application startup in ConfigureServices() method. I'm using XUnit 2.4.1.
Usage
Instead of:
services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>
options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(new ViewLocationExpander());
);
I can use:
services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
ViewLocationExpander
public class ViewLocationExpander : IViewLocationExpander
public IEnumerable<string> ExpandViewLocations(
ViewLocationExpanderContext context,
IEnumerable<string> viewLocations)
if (context == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
if (viewLocations == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocations));
/*
* Note:
* 0 = action name
* 1 = controller name
* 2 = area name
*/
var newViewLocations = new string[]
// Example: '/Views/Home/_Partials/FooBar.cshtml'
"/Views/1/_Partials/0.cshtml",
;
// Add new locations *AFTER* MVC default locations.
return viewLocations.Union(newViewLocations);
public void PopulateValues(ViewLocationExpanderContext context)
context.Values["customviewlocation"] = nameof(ViewLocationExpander);
Extension method
public static IServiceCollection AddViewLocationExpander(
this IServiceCollection services,
IViewLocationExpander viewLocationExpander)
if (services == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));
if (viewLocationExpander == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocationExpander));
return services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>
options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(viewLocationExpander);
);
Unit tests
[Fact]
public void ExtensionMethodAddsNewViewLocationExpander()
// Arrange
var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddMvc();
// These two are required to active the RazorViewEngineOptions.
services.AddSingleton<IHostingEnvironment, HostingEnvironment>();
services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, LoggerFactory>();
// Act
var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var oldOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var newOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
// Assert
Assert.True(newOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count > oldOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count);
Questions
- Am I going beyond the scope of what unit testing should include? I'm afraid that my code is actually testing the basic functions of generic collections and/or aspects of ASP.NET Core.
- If my concern above is true, that should I write unit tests to this at all? How should it work?
c# unit-testing asp.net-core
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Introduction
I'm writing unit tests for an extension method I wrote. Its only purpose it is to wrap startup logic which extends ViewLocationExpanders list by an instance implementating IViewLocationExpander. ViewLocationExpanders is a property of RazorViewEngineOptions, which can be configured in application startup in ConfigureServices() method. I'm using XUnit 2.4.1.
Usage
Instead of:
services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>
options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(new ViewLocationExpander());
);
I can use:
services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
ViewLocationExpander
public class ViewLocationExpander : IViewLocationExpander
public IEnumerable<string> ExpandViewLocations(
ViewLocationExpanderContext context,
IEnumerable<string> viewLocations)
if (context == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
if (viewLocations == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocations));
/*
* Note:
* 0 = action name
* 1 = controller name
* 2 = area name
*/
var newViewLocations = new string[]
// Example: '/Views/Home/_Partials/FooBar.cshtml'
"/Views/1/_Partials/0.cshtml",
;
// Add new locations *AFTER* MVC default locations.
return viewLocations.Union(newViewLocations);
public void PopulateValues(ViewLocationExpanderContext context)
context.Values["customviewlocation"] = nameof(ViewLocationExpander);
Extension method
public static IServiceCollection AddViewLocationExpander(
this IServiceCollection services,
IViewLocationExpander viewLocationExpander)
if (services == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));
if (viewLocationExpander == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocationExpander));
return services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>
options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(viewLocationExpander);
);
Unit tests
[Fact]
public void ExtensionMethodAddsNewViewLocationExpander()
// Arrange
var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddMvc();
// These two are required to active the RazorViewEngineOptions.
services.AddSingleton<IHostingEnvironment, HostingEnvironment>();
services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, LoggerFactory>();
// Act
var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var oldOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var newOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
// Assert
Assert.True(newOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count > oldOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count);
Questions
- Am I going beyond the scope of what unit testing should include? I'm afraid that my code is actually testing the basic functions of generic collections and/or aspects of ASP.NET Core.
- If my concern above is true, that should I write unit tests to this at all? How should it work?
c# unit-testing asp.net-core
$endgroup$
Introduction
I'm writing unit tests for an extension method I wrote. Its only purpose it is to wrap startup logic which extends ViewLocationExpanders list by an instance implementating IViewLocationExpander. ViewLocationExpanders is a property of RazorViewEngineOptions, which can be configured in application startup in ConfigureServices() method. I'm using XUnit 2.4.1.
Usage
Instead of:
services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>
options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(new ViewLocationExpander());
);
I can use:
services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
ViewLocationExpander
public class ViewLocationExpander : IViewLocationExpander
public IEnumerable<string> ExpandViewLocations(
ViewLocationExpanderContext context,
IEnumerable<string> viewLocations)
if (context == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
if (viewLocations == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocations));
/*
* Note:
* 0 = action name
* 1 = controller name
* 2 = area name
*/
var newViewLocations = new string[]
// Example: '/Views/Home/_Partials/FooBar.cshtml'
"/Views/1/_Partials/0.cshtml",
;
// Add new locations *AFTER* MVC default locations.
return viewLocations.Union(newViewLocations);
public void PopulateValues(ViewLocationExpanderContext context)
context.Values["customviewlocation"] = nameof(ViewLocationExpander);
Extension method
public static IServiceCollection AddViewLocationExpander(
this IServiceCollection services,
IViewLocationExpander viewLocationExpander)
if (services == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));
if (viewLocationExpander == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocationExpander));
return services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>
options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(viewLocationExpander);
);
Unit tests
[Fact]
public void ExtensionMethodAddsNewViewLocationExpander()
// Arrange
var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddMvc();
// These two are required to active the RazorViewEngineOptions.
services.AddSingleton<IHostingEnvironment, HostingEnvironment>();
services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, LoggerFactory>();
// Act
var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var oldOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var newOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
// Assert
Assert.True(newOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count > oldOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count);
Questions
- Am I going beyond the scope of what unit testing should include? I'm afraid that my code is actually testing the basic functions of generic collections and/or aspects of ASP.NET Core.
- If my concern above is true, that should I write unit tests to this at all? How should it work?
c# unit-testing asp.net-core
c# unit-testing asp.net-core
asked 4 hours ago
PrologProlog
468
468
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.
You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.
This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the newViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
$endgroup$
– Prolog
43 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217748%2funit-testing-extension-method-adding-view-location-expander%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.
You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.
This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the newViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
$endgroup$
– Prolog
43 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.
You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.
This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the newViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
$endgroup$
– Prolog
43 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.
You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.
This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.
$endgroup$
I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.
You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.
This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.
answered 2 hours ago
t3chb0tt3chb0t
35.3k754127
35.3k754127
$begingroup$
Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the newViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
$endgroup$
– Prolog
43 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the newViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
$endgroup$
– Prolog
43 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the new
ViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.$endgroup$
– Prolog
43 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the new
ViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.$endgroup$
– Prolog
43 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217748%2funit-testing-extension-method-adding-view-location-expander%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown