Mryntu

How can I wire 7 outdoor posts correctly?

Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?

Replace four times with sed

Matrix using tikz package

Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?

Variable completely messes up echoed string

Could this Scherzo by Beethoven be considered to be a fugue?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?

Print a physical multiplication table

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

What are substitutions for coconut in curry?

What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?

How could an airship be repaired midflight?

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of fibres of Lipschitz maps

What if (if any) the reason to buy in small local stores?

What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?

Is this an example of a Neapolitan chord?

Unnormalized Log Probability - RNN

Do US professors/group leaders only get a salary, but no group budget?

How does one measure the Fourier components of a signal?

Constant Current LED Circuit

How can my new character not be a role-playing handicap to the party?

What is the plural TO / OF something

experience at/in/on high school levels“Not until” and “by”Write plural of/to the following wordsIs there any difference between “changing mind on something” and “changing mind about something”On the end of somethingwhen to use 'for' in this case?“do to” vs. “do with”“sort of” vs. “a sort of”In the field or on the field?Why is it 'a ticket _to_ the cinema' but 'a ticket _for_ a/the concert'?

3

1

What is the plural of boy?

What is the plural to boy?

Are they interchangeable?

prepositions grammaticality-in-context

share|improve this question

edited 21 mins ago

jwodder

13714

asked 11 hours ago

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

373111

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).
  
  – userr2684291
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

1

What is the plural of boy?

What is the plural to boy?

Are they interchangeable?

prepositions grammaticality-in-context

share|improve this question

edited 21 mins ago

jwodder

13714

asked 11 hours ago

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

373111

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).
  
  – userr2684291
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

What is the plural of boy?

What is the plural to boy?

Are they interchangeable?

prepositions grammaticality-in-context

share|improve this question

edited 21 mins ago

jwodder

13714

asked 11 hours ago

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

373111

share|improve this question

edited 21 mins ago

jwodder

13714

asked 11 hours ago

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

373111

share|improve this question

edited 21 mins ago

jwodder

13714

asked 11 hours ago

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

373111

edited 21 mins ago

jwodder

13714

edited 21 mins ago

jwodder

13714

asked 11 hours ago

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

373111

asked 11 hours ago

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

373111

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

9

It’s always the plural of something.

What is the plural of “boy”?

To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.

“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.

The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.

What's the plural of “tooth”?

share|improve this answer

answered 11 hours ago

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,628521

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."
  
  – Kumar sadhu
  11 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.
  
  – Chris Melville
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.
  
  – amI
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

"there is no singular to audience."

This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.

The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:

There is no plural form of 'sheep'

There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'

This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.

In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.

Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

FSCKurFSCKur

211

New contributor

FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.
  
  – fred2
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."
  
  – amI
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!
  
  – FSCKur
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200923%2fwhat-is-the-plural-to-of-something%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

9

It’s always the plural of something.

What is the plural of “boy”?

To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.

“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.

The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.

What's the plural of “tooth”?

share|improve this answer

answered 11 hours ago

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,628521

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."
  
  – Kumar sadhu
  11 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.
  
  – Chris Melville
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.
  
  – amI
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

9

It’s always the plural of something.

What is the plural of “boy”?

To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.

“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.

The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.

What's the plural of “tooth”?

share|improve this answer

answered 11 hours ago

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,628521

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."
  
  – Kumar sadhu
  11 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.
  
  – Chris Melville
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.
  
  – amI
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

It’s always the plural of something.

What is the plural of “boy”?

To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.

“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.

The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.

What's the plural of “tooth”?

share|improve this answer

answered 11 hours ago

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,628521

share|improve this answer

answered 11 hours ago

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,628521

answered 11 hours ago

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,628521

answered 11 hours ago

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,628521

2

"there is no singular to audience."

This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.

The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:

There is no plural form of 'sheep'

There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'

This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.

In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.

Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

FSCKurFSCKur

211

New contributor

FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.
  
  – fred2
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."
  
  – amI
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!
  
  – FSCKur
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

"there is no singular to audience."

This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.

The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:

There is no plural form of 'sheep'

There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'

This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.

In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.

Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

FSCKurFSCKur

211

New contributor

FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.
  
  – fred2
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."
  
  – amI
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!
  
  – FSCKur
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

"there is no singular to audience."

This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.

The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:

There is no plural form of 'sheep'

There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'

This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.

In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.

Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

FSCKurFSCKur

211

New contributor

FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

FSCKurFSCKur

211

New contributor

FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

answered 4 hours ago

FSCKurFSCKur

211

New contributor

FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

answered 4 hours ago

FSCKurFSCKur

211