Trademark violation for app? Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Duration of a license granted without specific boundWhy an app that streams audio from third party site that extracts audio from Youtube is illegal?Trademark infringement between product and softwareWhatsAPI Use for iOS App - legal/illegal ? & Specific boundaries?Intellectual Property of creating an app version of a board gameUse of Microsoft Trademark in Product NameCan I make and sell printable worksheets for board games without infringing on copyright?Copyright and derivative worksIs it likely that I will be able to use short (1 second) video clips in my mobile app?When is an image considered a recreation of another image?
What does the "x" in "x86" represent?
Most bit efficient text communication method?
Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with command.com?
Is safe to use va_start macro with this as parameter?
For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline
Is it common practice to audition new musicians 1-2-1 before rehearsing with the entire band?
Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube
What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
bold in theorem
How to superpose two composite qubit states?
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
What is the longest distance a player character can jump in one leap?
Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?
Find the length x such that the two distances in the triangle are the same
What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?
What is the meaning of the simile “quick as silk”?
Wu formula for manifolds with boundary
2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?
When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?
Where are Serre’s lectures at Collège de France to be found?
Why do the resolve message appear first?
Does classifying an integer as a discrete log require it be part of a multiplicative group?
Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation
Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?
Trademark violation for app?
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Duration of a license granted without specific boundWhy an app that streams audio from third party site that extracts audio from Youtube is illegal?Trademark infringement between product and softwareWhatsAPI Use for iOS App - legal/illegal ? & Specific boundaries?Intellectual Property of creating an app version of a board gameUse of Microsoft Trademark in Product NameCan I make and sell printable worksheets for board games without infringing on copyright?Copyright and derivative worksIs it likely that I will be able to use short (1 second) video clips in my mobile app?When is an image considered a recreation of another image?
I've just received an email from a Turkish app developer who believes my app infringes on his copyright. I've done some reading and read that essentially I'm not allowed to violate any patents or outright steal the work by copying it but otherwise should be fine if portions of the apps match.
To elaborate:
I'm from Germany, the other developer is from Turkey
The app is distributed using the Google Play store (US-based)
Both apps provide the same core functionality
There are about 30 apps providing the same core functionality
The app of the other developer was published in 2015, mine in 2017.
My app was created from the ground up and doesn't use any sources of other apps (I created the layout by myself as well)
The other developer seems to hold at least some sort of copyright in Turkey: https://imgur.com/a/HWtyDh4 (blacked out)
I admit that both apps have a similar main UI (same color, same input elements) which however noticeably differ in design choices, user experience, and scope. But apart from that (the main view), the UI differs completely.
Is there any grounds for copyright infringement, if the apps look similar, but the actual sources aren't derived from any sort of original work?
copyright trademark
New contributor
Ch4t4r is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 3 more comments
I've just received an email from a Turkish app developer who believes my app infringes on his copyright. I've done some reading and read that essentially I'm not allowed to violate any patents or outright steal the work by copying it but otherwise should be fine if portions of the apps match.
To elaborate:
I'm from Germany, the other developer is from Turkey
The app is distributed using the Google Play store (US-based)
Both apps provide the same core functionality
There are about 30 apps providing the same core functionality
The app of the other developer was published in 2015, mine in 2017.
My app was created from the ground up and doesn't use any sources of other apps (I created the layout by myself as well)
The other developer seems to hold at least some sort of copyright in Turkey: https://imgur.com/a/HWtyDh4 (blacked out)
I admit that both apps have a similar main UI (same color, same input elements) which however noticeably differ in design choices, user experience, and scope. But apart from that (the main view), the UI differs completely.
Is there any grounds for copyright infringement, if the apps look similar, but the actual sources aren't derived from any sort of original work?
copyright trademark
New contributor
Ch4t4r is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Where are you from? Company wise.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
I'm a private person, my app is non-commercial (no ads, no payments, no tracking) -- thus I manage it myself without a company.
– Ch4t4r
2 hours ago
That is fine, I just wondered if you had an office or anything in Turkey that would put you under Turkish laws.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
Sorry to ask, but do you have any reference for that? What you stated matches what I read but it would give me a bit of a better feeling.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
And to add, the app is distributed over the play store in Turkey as well but I'm not based there. The other app developer has some sort of proof of ownership from some sort of turkish ministry, but it doesn't seem to be a patent (it even states "The entitlement does not qualify, it only provides the ease of proof in determining the owner of the work", translated with Google)
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
I've just received an email from a Turkish app developer who believes my app infringes on his copyright. I've done some reading and read that essentially I'm not allowed to violate any patents or outright steal the work by copying it but otherwise should be fine if portions of the apps match.
To elaborate:
I'm from Germany, the other developer is from Turkey
The app is distributed using the Google Play store (US-based)
Both apps provide the same core functionality
There are about 30 apps providing the same core functionality
The app of the other developer was published in 2015, mine in 2017.
My app was created from the ground up and doesn't use any sources of other apps (I created the layout by myself as well)
The other developer seems to hold at least some sort of copyright in Turkey: https://imgur.com/a/HWtyDh4 (blacked out)
I admit that both apps have a similar main UI (same color, same input elements) which however noticeably differ in design choices, user experience, and scope. But apart from that (the main view), the UI differs completely.
Is there any grounds for copyright infringement, if the apps look similar, but the actual sources aren't derived from any sort of original work?
copyright trademark
New contributor
Ch4t4r is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I've just received an email from a Turkish app developer who believes my app infringes on his copyright. I've done some reading and read that essentially I'm not allowed to violate any patents or outright steal the work by copying it but otherwise should be fine if portions of the apps match.
To elaborate:
I'm from Germany, the other developer is from Turkey
The app is distributed using the Google Play store (US-based)
Both apps provide the same core functionality
There are about 30 apps providing the same core functionality
The app of the other developer was published in 2015, mine in 2017.
My app was created from the ground up and doesn't use any sources of other apps (I created the layout by myself as well)
The other developer seems to hold at least some sort of copyright in Turkey: https://imgur.com/a/HWtyDh4 (blacked out)
I admit that both apps have a similar main UI (same color, same input elements) which however noticeably differ in design choices, user experience, and scope. But apart from that (the main view), the UI differs completely.
Is there any grounds for copyright infringement, if the apps look similar, but the actual sources aren't derived from any sort of original work?
copyright trademark
copyright trademark
New contributor
Ch4t4r is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ch4t4r is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
Ch4t4r
New contributor
Ch4t4r is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
Ch4t4rCh4t4r
1086
1086
New contributor
Ch4t4r is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ch4t4r is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ch4t4r is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Where are you from? Company wise.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
I'm a private person, my app is non-commercial (no ads, no payments, no tracking) -- thus I manage it myself without a company.
– Ch4t4r
2 hours ago
That is fine, I just wondered if you had an office or anything in Turkey that would put you under Turkish laws.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
Sorry to ask, but do you have any reference for that? What you stated matches what I read but it would give me a bit of a better feeling.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
And to add, the app is distributed over the play store in Turkey as well but I'm not based there. The other app developer has some sort of proof of ownership from some sort of turkish ministry, but it doesn't seem to be a patent (it even states "The entitlement does not qualify, it only provides the ease of proof in determining the owner of the work", translated with Google)
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
Where are you from? Company wise.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
I'm a private person, my app is non-commercial (no ads, no payments, no tracking) -- thus I manage it myself without a company.
– Ch4t4r
2 hours ago
That is fine, I just wondered if you had an office or anything in Turkey that would put you under Turkish laws.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
Sorry to ask, but do you have any reference for that? What you stated matches what I read but it would give me a bit of a better feeling.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
And to add, the app is distributed over the play store in Turkey as well but I'm not based there. The other app developer has some sort of proof of ownership from some sort of turkish ministry, but it doesn't seem to be a patent (it even states "The entitlement does not qualify, it only provides the ease of proof in determining the owner of the work", translated with Google)
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
Where are you from? Company wise.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
Where are you from? Company wise.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
I'm a private person, my app is non-commercial (no ads, no payments, no tracking) -- thus I manage it myself without a company.
– Ch4t4r
2 hours ago
I'm a private person, my app is non-commercial (no ads, no payments, no tracking) -- thus I manage it myself without a company.
– Ch4t4r
2 hours ago
That is fine, I just wondered if you had an office or anything in Turkey that would put you under Turkish laws.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
That is fine, I just wondered if you had an office or anything in Turkey that would put you under Turkish laws.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
Sorry to ask, but do you have any reference for that? What you stated matches what I read but it would give me a bit of a better feeling.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
Sorry to ask, but do you have any reference for that? What you stated matches what I read but it would give me a bit of a better feeling.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
And to add, the app is distributed over the play store in Turkey as well but I'm not based there. The other app developer has some sort of proof of ownership from some sort of turkish ministry, but it doesn't seem to be a patent (it even states "The entitlement does not qualify, it only provides the ease of proof in determining the owner of the work", translated with Google)
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
And to add, the app is distributed over the play store in Turkey as well but I'm not based there. The other app developer has some sort of proof of ownership from some sort of turkish ministry, but it doesn't seem to be a patent (it even states "The entitlement does not qualify, it only provides the ease of proof in determining the owner of the work", translated with Google)
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There are multiple parts to copyright when it comes to an app. The first is the code and the second is the content in the app.
Copyright an app. You can claim copyright protection for the actual code of an app, but there is a lot more that copyright law protects. An app that serves as a virtual tour guide through museums, for example, may have a script that describes all of the artwork. That script may be copyrightable. For an app that provides dozens of pictures of houses representing various architectural styles, each picture may be copyrightable. In addition to the app itself, the individual parts of your app may be collectively or individually copyrightable, so be sure to consider the full value of your app. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/four-steps-to-protect-your-app-and-yourself
You said you wrote all the code, so you probably aren't violating any copyrights code wise.
That leaves the content of the app as the only way you could be in violation. If your app uses any of the content from his app, you would be violating the copyright.
Copyright protects the way in which an idea is expressed. For example, it's possible for two dictionary apps to exist, because you can't copyright the concept of a dictionary. However, if one app uses definitions from the other or copy and pastes elements of its design, that app could have copyright infringement issues. While the best apps are ones that fill a gap, multiple apps can exist in the same niche if they don't borrow one another's content. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/copyright-stop-making-iphone-apps-76231.html
Obviously, in similar apps, some UI elements may be similar, but you can't outright copy any graphics, text, or otherwise copyrighted or trademarked content.
Thanks for the links. I did neither copy any layouts nor any sort of artwork (like icons, texts, graphics and such) which leaves me under the impression that I should mostly be fine. I understand that anyone can sue for anything though (which doesn't mean that a lawsuit would be successful).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I hope it goes well and thanks for accepting my answer.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Disclaimer: I"m from the US and don't claim to know German or Turkish law. So let me discuss some general principles here, but details may well be different in Germany and Turkey.
You're mixing together three very different things: trademark, copyright, and patent.
Copyright protects the expression of an idea, in this case, the exact computer code, images, etc. If you didn't copy his code, the chance that you would coincidentally write identical code is remote. The fact that you both have a line of code that says "x=x+1" wouldn't give him any grounds for a lawsuit. He'd have to show substantial portions of the code were identical. If you didn't deliberately copy his code, this isn't going to happen. Barring some extraordinary and unbelievable coincidence, you can't violate copyright accidentally.
Trademark protects names and symbols used to identify a company or a product. If you decided to call your software company "Microsoft", then that other Microsoft could sue you for trademark infringement. Likewise if you copied somebody else's logo or other distinctive graphics. This is very different from copyright. It is quite possible to violate someone's trademark accidentally. Especially if he gave his company or product a rather generic name. Like if someone called his product, say, "Password Manager", someone else might make a product with the same name without ever having heard of the original. Ditto if he has some simple logo or other graphics. If you did accidentally duplicate a name or graphic elements, well, in the US a court would likely order you to change your name or graphics and that would be the end of it, unless you refused, in which case you'd end up in court. US Courts have ruled that very generic names have limited trademark protection. An example I saw recently was "Main Street Auto Repair". A court said that the owner of that name could prevent someone else from opening a shop in the same town with the same name, but he couldn't sue someone in another town who happened to use the same name. This is why, by the way, companies often use made-up words for their product names. In your case, this should be a trivial issue. If he is claiming trademark to the look of the main menu screen, just change the colors or move some buttons around. If it actually went to court, you should be able to argue that the similarity was accidental and when you were informed you promptly changed it, and that should be the end of it. Depending, I guess, on how hard-nosed the judge is, etc.
Patents are different still. A patent gives the owner the exclusive write to use an invention or process for a specified period of time. It doesn't matter if you invented the same thing entirely independently. Whoever filed the patent first has exclusive rights. There have been cases where an inventor lost out to someone with a similar invention because he submitted his patent application one day later. If this other person has patents that you are infringing, you are pretty much out of luck.
A very elaborate answer which explains the basics to someone like me, thanks. I don't believe the other developer is going to sue, I just offer similar services for free which might bother him. The names of the apps are very, very similar - Both are named DNS Changer - but I would argue that this name is very basic and can not be trademarked (a trademark search revealed nothing as well). But as you mentioned, this decision would be up to a judge if it came to that.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
You have the same name? Change the name my man.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
Might be a good idea, yes. But the name is not what they are referring to, there are tons of apps with that name, around 40, (and they don't seem to hold a trademark for it).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I get you that its a common name and thing. I just meant its a nice gesture.
– Putvi
15 mins ago
That's true. But they weren't even the first to use the name for software. But I will change the name whilst still keeping the original meaning.
– Ch4t4r
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Ch4t4r is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39216%2ftrademark-violation-for-app%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are multiple parts to copyright when it comes to an app. The first is the code and the second is the content in the app.
Copyright an app. You can claim copyright protection for the actual code of an app, but there is a lot more that copyright law protects. An app that serves as a virtual tour guide through museums, for example, may have a script that describes all of the artwork. That script may be copyrightable. For an app that provides dozens of pictures of houses representing various architectural styles, each picture may be copyrightable. In addition to the app itself, the individual parts of your app may be collectively or individually copyrightable, so be sure to consider the full value of your app. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/four-steps-to-protect-your-app-and-yourself
You said you wrote all the code, so you probably aren't violating any copyrights code wise.
That leaves the content of the app as the only way you could be in violation. If your app uses any of the content from his app, you would be violating the copyright.
Copyright protects the way in which an idea is expressed. For example, it's possible for two dictionary apps to exist, because you can't copyright the concept of a dictionary. However, if one app uses definitions from the other or copy and pastes elements of its design, that app could have copyright infringement issues. While the best apps are ones that fill a gap, multiple apps can exist in the same niche if they don't borrow one another's content. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/copyright-stop-making-iphone-apps-76231.html
Obviously, in similar apps, some UI elements may be similar, but you can't outright copy any graphics, text, or otherwise copyrighted or trademarked content.
Thanks for the links. I did neither copy any layouts nor any sort of artwork (like icons, texts, graphics and such) which leaves me under the impression that I should mostly be fine. I understand that anyone can sue for anything though (which doesn't mean that a lawsuit would be successful).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I hope it goes well and thanks for accepting my answer.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
add a comment |
There are multiple parts to copyright when it comes to an app. The first is the code and the second is the content in the app.
Copyright an app. You can claim copyright protection for the actual code of an app, but there is a lot more that copyright law protects. An app that serves as a virtual tour guide through museums, for example, may have a script that describes all of the artwork. That script may be copyrightable. For an app that provides dozens of pictures of houses representing various architectural styles, each picture may be copyrightable. In addition to the app itself, the individual parts of your app may be collectively or individually copyrightable, so be sure to consider the full value of your app. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/four-steps-to-protect-your-app-and-yourself
You said you wrote all the code, so you probably aren't violating any copyrights code wise.
That leaves the content of the app as the only way you could be in violation. If your app uses any of the content from his app, you would be violating the copyright.
Copyright protects the way in which an idea is expressed. For example, it's possible for two dictionary apps to exist, because you can't copyright the concept of a dictionary. However, if one app uses definitions from the other or copy and pastes elements of its design, that app could have copyright infringement issues. While the best apps are ones that fill a gap, multiple apps can exist in the same niche if they don't borrow one another's content. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/copyright-stop-making-iphone-apps-76231.html
Obviously, in similar apps, some UI elements may be similar, but you can't outright copy any graphics, text, or otherwise copyrighted or trademarked content.
Thanks for the links. I did neither copy any layouts nor any sort of artwork (like icons, texts, graphics and such) which leaves me under the impression that I should mostly be fine. I understand that anyone can sue for anything though (which doesn't mean that a lawsuit would be successful).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I hope it goes well and thanks for accepting my answer.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
add a comment |
There are multiple parts to copyright when it comes to an app. The first is the code and the second is the content in the app.
Copyright an app. You can claim copyright protection for the actual code of an app, but there is a lot more that copyright law protects. An app that serves as a virtual tour guide through museums, for example, may have a script that describes all of the artwork. That script may be copyrightable. For an app that provides dozens of pictures of houses representing various architectural styles, each picture may be copyrightable. In addition to the app itself, the individual parts of your app may be collectively or individually copyrightable, so be sure to consider the full value of your app. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/four-steps-to-protect-your-app-and-yourself
You said you wrote all the code, so you probably aren't violating any copyrights code wise.
That leaves the content of the app as the only way you could be in violation. If your app uses any of the content from his app, you would be violating the copyright.
Copyright protects the way in which an idea is expressed. For example, it's possible for two dictionary apps to exist, because you can't copyright the concept of a dictionary. However, if one app uses definitions from the other or copy and pastes elements of its design, that app could have copyright infringement issues. While the best apps are ones that fill a gap, multiple apps can exist in the same niche if they don't borrow one another's content. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/copyright-stop-making-iphone-apps-76231.html
Obviously, in similar apps, some UI elements may be similar, but you can't outright copy any graphics, text, or otherwise copyrighted or trademarked content.
There are multiple parts to copyright when it comes to an app. The first is the code and the second is the content in the app.
Copyright an app. You can claim copyright protection for the actual code of an app, but there is a lot more that copyright law protects. An app that serves as a virtual tour guide through museums, for example, may have a script that describes all of the artwork. That script may be copyrightable. For an app that provides dozens of pictures of houses representing various architectural styles, each picture may be copyrightable. In addition to the app itself, the individual parts of your app may be collectively or individually copyrightable, so be sure to consider the full value of your app. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/four-steps-to-protect-your-app-and-yourself
You said you wrote all the code, so you probably aren't violating any copyrights code wise.
That leaves the content of the app as the only way you could be in violation. If your app uses any of the content from his app, you would be violating the copyright.
Copyright protects the way in which an idea is expressed. For example, it's possible for two dictionary apps to exist, because you can't copyright the concept of a dictionary. However, if one app uses definitions from the other or copy and pastes elements of its design, that app could have copyright infringement issues. While the best apps are ones that fill a gap, multiple apps can exist in the same niche if they don't borrow one another's content. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/copyright-stop-making-iphone-apps-76231.html
Obviously, in similar apps, some UI elements may be similar, but you can't outright copy any graphics, text, or otherwise copyrighted or trademarked content.
answered 1 hour ago
PutviPutvi
1,244111
1,244111
Thanks for the links. I did neither copy any layouts nor any sort of artwork (like icons, texts, graphics and such) which leaves me under the impression that I should mostly be fine. I understand that anyone can sue for anything though (which doesn't mean that a lawsuit would be successful).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I hope it goes well and thanks for accepting my answer.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for the links. I did neither copy any layouts nor any sort of artwork (like icons, texts, graphics and such) which leaves me under the impression that I should mostly be fine. I understand that anyone can sue for anything though (which doesn't mean that a lawsuit would be successful).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I hope it goes well and thanks for accepting my answer.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
Thanks for the links. I did neither copy any layouts nor any sort of artwork (like icons, texts, graphics and such) which leaves me under the impression that I should mostly be fine. I understand that anyone can sue for anything though (which doesn't mean that a lawsuit would be successful).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
Thanks for the links. I did neither copy any layouts nor any sort of artwork (like icons, texts, graphics and such) which leaves me under the impression that I should mostly be fine. I understand that anyone can sue for anything though (which doesn't mean that a lawsuit would be successful).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I hope it goes well and thanks for accepting my answer.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
I hope it goes well and thanks for accepting my answer.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Disclaimer: I"m from the US and don't claim to know German or Turkish law. So let me discuss some general principles here, but details may well be different in Germany and Turkey.
You're mixing together three very different things: trademark, copyright, and patent.
Copyright protects the expression of an idea, in this case, the exact computer code, images, etc. If you didn't copy his code, the chance that you would coincidentally write identical code is remote. The fact that you both have a line of code that says "x=x+1" wouldn't give him any grounds for a lawsuit. He'd have to show substantial portions of the code were identical. If you didn't deliberately copy his code, this isn't going to happen. Barring some extraordinary and unbelievable coincidence, you can't violate copyright accidentally.
Trademark protects names and symbols used to identify a company or a product. If you decided to call your software company "Microsoft", then that other Microsoft could sue you for trademark infringement. Likewise if you copied somebody else's logo or other distinctive graphics. This is very different from copyright. It is quite possible to violate someone's trademark accidentally. Especially if he gave his company or product a rather generic name. Like if someone called his product, say, "Password Manager", someone else might make a product with the same name without ever having heard of the original. Ditto if he has some simple logo or other graphics. If you did accidentally duplicate a name or graphic elements, well, in the US a court would likely order you to change your name or graphics and that would be the end of it, unless you refused, in which case you'd end up in court. US Courts have ruled that very generic names have limited trademark protection. An example I saw recently was "Main Street Auto Repair". A court said that the owner of that name could prevent someone else from opening a shop in the same town with the same name, but he couldn't sue someone in another town who happened to use the same name. This is why, by the way, companies often use made-up words for their product names. In your case, this should be a trivial issue. If he is claiming trademark to the look of the main menu screen, just change the colors or move some buttons around. If it actually went to court, you should be able to argue that the similarity was accidental and when you were informed you promptly changed it, and that should be the end of it. Depending, I guess, on how hard-nosed the judge is, etc.
Patents are different still. A patent gives the owner the exclusive write to use an invention or process for a specified period of time. It doesn't matter if you invented the same thing entirely independently. Whoever filed the patent first has exclusive rights. There have been cases where an inventor lost out to someone with a similar invention because he submitted his patent application one day later. If this other person has patents that you are infringing, you are pretty much out of luck.
A very elaborate answer which explains the basics to someone like me, thanks. I don't believe the other developer is going to sue, I just offer similar services for free which might bother him. The names of the apps are very, very similar - Both are named DNS Changer - but I would argue that this name is very basic and can not be trademarked (a trademark search revealed nothing as well). But as you mentioned, this decision would be up to a judge if it came to that.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
You have the same name? Change the name my man.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
Might be a good idea, yes. But the name is not what they are referring to, there are tons of apps with that name, around 40, (and they don't seem to hold a trademark for it).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I get you that its a common name and thing. I just meant its a nice gesture.
– Putvi
15 mins ago
That's true. But they weren't even the first to use the name for software. But I will change the name whilst still keeping the original meaning.
– Ch4t4r
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Disclaimer: I"m from the US and don't claim to know German or Turkish law. So let me discuss some general principles here, but details may well be different in Germany and Turkey.
You're mixing together three very different things: trademark, copyright, and patent.
Copyright protects the expression of an idea, in this case, the exact computer code, images, etc. If you didn't copy his code, the chance that you would coincidentally write identical code is remote. The fact that you both have a line of code that says "x=x+1" wouldn't give him any grounds for a lawsuit. He'd have to show substantial portions of the code were identical. If you didn't deliberately copy his code, this isn't going to happen. Barring some extraordinary and unbelievable coincidence, you can't violate copyright accidentally.
Trademark protects names and symbols used to identify a company or a product. If you decided to call your software company "Microsoft", then that other Microsoft could sue you for trademark infringement. Likewise if you copied somebody else's logo or other distinctive graphics. This is very different from copyright. It is quite possible to violate someone's trademark accidentally. Especially if he gave his company or product a rather generic name. Like if someone called his product, say, "Password Manager", someone else might make a product with the same name without ever having heard of the original. Ditto if he has some simple logo or other graphics. If you did accidentally duplicate a name or graphic elements, well, in the US a court would likely order you to change your name or graphics and that would be the end of it, unless you refused, in which case you'd end up in court. US Courts have ruled that very generic names have limited trademark protection. An example I saw recently was "Main Street Auto Repair". A court said that the owner of that name could prevent someone else from opening a shop in the same town with the same name, but he couldn't sue someone in another town who happened to use the same name. This is why, by the way, companies often use made-up words for their product names. In your case, this should be a trivial issue. If he is claiming trademark to the look of the main menu screen, just change the colors or move some buttons around. If it actually went to court, you should be able to argue that the similarity was accidental and when you were informed you promptly changed it, and that should be the end of it. Depending, I guess, on how hard-nosed the judge is, etc.
Patents are different still. A patent gives the owner the exclusive write to use an invention or process for a specified period of time. It doesn't matter if you invented the same thing entirely independently. Whoever filed the patent first has exclusive rights. There have been cases where an inventor lost out to someone with a similar invention because he submitted his patent application one day later. If this other person has patents that you are infringing, you are pretty much out of luck.
A very elaborate answer which explains the basics to someone like me, thanks. I don't believe the other developer is going to sue, I just offer similar services for free which might bother him. The names of the apps are very, very similar - Both are named DNS Changer - but I would argue that this name is very basic and can not be trademarked (a trademark search revealed nothing as well). But as you mentioned, this decision would be up to a judge if it came to that.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
You have the same name? Change the name my man.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
Might be a good idea, yes. But the name is not what they are referring to, there are tons of apps with that name, around 40, (and they don't seem to hold a trademark for it).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I get you that its a common name and thing. I just meant its a nice gesture.
– Putvi
15 mins ago
That's true. But they weren't even the first to use the name for software. But I will change the name whilst still keeping the original meaning.
– Ch4t4r
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Disclaimer: I"m from the US and don't claim to know German or Turkish law. So let me discuss some general principles here, but details may well be different in Germany and Turkey.
You're mixing together three very different things: trademark, copyright, and patent.
Copyright protects the expression of an idea, in this case, the exact computer code, images, etc. If you didn't copy his code, the chance that you would coincidentally write identical code is remote. The fact that you both have a line of code that says "x=x+1" wouldn't give him any grounds for a lawsuit. He'd have to show substantial portions of the code were identical. If you didn't deliberately copy his code, this isn't going to happen. Barring some extraordinary and unbelievable coincidence, you can't violate copyright accidentally.
Trademark protects names and symbols used to identify a company or a product. If you decided to call your software company "Microsoft", then that other Microsoft could sue you for trademark infringement. Likewise if you copied somebody else's logo or other distinctive graphics. This is very different from copyright. It is quite possible to violate someone's trademark accidentally. Especially if he gave his company or product a rather generic name. Like if someone called his product, say, "Password Manager", someone else might make a product with the same name without ever having heard of the original. Ditto if he has some simple logo or other graphics. If you did accidentally duplicate a name or graphic elements, well, in the US a court would likely order you to change your name or graphics and that would be the end of it, unless you refused, in which case you'd end up in court. US Courts have ruled that very generic names have limited trademark protection. An example I saw recently was "Main Street Auto Repair". A court said that the owner of that name could prevent someone else from opening a shop in the same town with the same name, but he couldn't sue someone in another town who happened to use the same name. This is why, by the way, companies often use made-up words for their product names. In your case, this should be a trivial issue. If he is claiming trademark to the look of the main menu screen, just change the colors or move some buttons around. If it actually went to court, you should be able to argue that the similarity was accidental and when you were informed you promptly changed it, and that should be the end of it. Depending, I guess, on how hard-nosed the judge is, etc.
Patents are different still. A patent gives the owner the exclusive write to use an invention or process for a specified period of time. It doesn't matter if you invented the same thing entirely independently. Whoever filed the patent first has exclusive rights. There have been cases where an inventor lost out to someone with a similar invention because he submitted his patent application one day later. If this other person has patents that you are infringing, you are pretty much out of luck.
Disclaimer: I"m from the US and don't claim to know German or Turkish law. So let me discuss some general principles here, but details may well be different in Germany and Turkey.
You're mixing together three very different things: trademark, copyright, and patent.
Copyright protects the expression of an idea, in this case, the exact computer code, images, etc. If you didn't copy his code, the chance that you would coincidentally write identical code is remote. The fact that you both have a line of code that says "x=x+1" wouldn't give him any grounds for a lawsuit. He'd have to show substantial portions of the code were identical. If you didn't deliberately copy his code, this isn't going to happen. Barring some extraordinary and unbelievable coincidence, you can't violate copyright accidentally.
Trademark protects names and symbols used to identify a company or a product. If you decided to call your software company "Microsoft", then that other Microsoft could sue you for trademark infringement. Likewise if you copied somebody else's logo or other distinctive graphics. This is very different from copyright. It is quite possible to violate someone's trademark accidentally. Especially if he gave his company or product a rather generic name. Like if someone called his product, say, "Password Manager", someone else might make a product with the same name without ever having heard of the original. Ditto if he has some simple logo or other graphics. If you did accidentally duplicate a name or graphic elements, well, in the US a court would likely order you to change your name or graphics and that would be the end of it, unless you refused, in which case you'd end up in court. US Courts have ruled that very generic names have limited trademark protection. An example I saw recently was "Main Street Auto Repair". A court said that the owner of that name could prevent someone else from opening a shop in the same town with the same name, but he couldn't sue someone in another town who happened to use the same name. This is why, by the way, companies often use made-up words for their product names. In your case, this should be a trivial issue. If he is claiming trademark to the look of the main menu screen, just change the colors or move some buttons around. If it actually went to court, you should be able to argue that the similarity was accidental and when you were informed you promptly changed it, and that should be the end of it. Depending, I guess, on how hard-nosed the judge is, etc.
Patents are different still. A patent gives the owner the exclusive write to use an invention or process for a specified period of time. It doesn't matter if you invented the same thing entirely independently. Whoever filed the patent first has exclusive rights. There have been cases where an inventor lost out to someone with a similar invention because he submitted his patent application one day later. If this other person has patents that you are infringing, you are pretty much out of luck.
answered 1 hour ago
JayJay
37513
37513
A very elaborate answer which explains the basics to someone like me, thanks. I don't believe the other developer is going to sue, I just offer similar services for free which might bother him. The names of the apps are very, very similar - Both are named DNS Changer - but I would argue that this name is very basic and can not be trademarked (a trademark search revealed nothing as well). But as you mentioned, this decision would be up to a judge if it came to that.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
You have the same name? Change the name my man.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
Might be a good idea, yes. But the name is not what they are referring to, there are tons of apps with that name, around 40, (and they don't seem to hold a trademark for it).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I get you that its a common name and thing. I just meant its a nice gesture.
– Putvi
15 mins ago
That's true. But they weren't even the first to use the name for software. But I will change the name whilst still keeping the original meaning.
– Ch4t4r
5 mins ago
add a comment |
A very elaborate answer which explains the basics to someone like me, thanks. I don't believe the other developer is going to sue, I just offer similar services for free which might bother him. The names of the apps are very, very similar - Both are named DNS Changer - but I would argue that this name is very basic and can not be trademarked (a trademark search revealed nothing as well). But as you mentioned, this decision would be up to a judge if it came to that.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
You have the same name? Change the name my man.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
Might be a good idea, yes. But the name is not what they are referring to, there are tons of apps with that name, around 40, (and they don't seem to hold a trademark for it).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I get you that its a common name and thing. I just meant its a nice gesture.
– Putvi
15 mins ago
That's true. But they weren't even the first to use the name for software. But I will change the name whilst still keeping the original meaning.
– Ch4t4r
5 mins ago
A very elaborate answer which explains the basics to someone like me, thanks. I don't believe the other developer is going to sue, I just offer similar services for free which might bother him. The names of the apps are very, very similar - Both are named DNS Changer - but I would argue that this name is very basic and can not be trademarked (a trademark search revealed nothing as well). But as you mentioned, this decision would be up to a judge if it came to that.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
A very elaborate answer which explains the basics to someone like me, thanks. I don't believe the other developer is going to sue, I just offer similar services for free which might bother him. The names of the apps are very, very similar - Both are named DNS Changer - but I would argue that this name is very basic and can not be trademarked (a trademark search revealed nothing as well). But as you mentioned, this decision would be up to a judge if it came to that.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
You have the same name? Change the name my man.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
You have the same name? Change the name my man.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
Might be a good idea, yes. But the name is not what they are referring to, there are tons of apps with that name, around 40, (and they don't seem to hold a trademark for it).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
Might be a good idea, yes. But the name is not what they are referring to, there are tons of apps with that name, around 40, (and they don't seem to hold a trademark for it).
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
I get you that its a common name and thing. I just meant its a nice gesture.
– Putvi
15 mins ago
I get you that its a common name and thing. I just meant its a nice gesture.
– Putvi
15 mins ago
That's true. But they weren't even the first to use the name for software. But I will change the name whilst still keeping the original meaning.
– Ch4t4r
5 mins ago
That's true. But they weren't even the first to use the name for software. But I will change the name whilst still keeping the original meaning.
– Ch4t4r
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Ch4t4r is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ch4t4r is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ch4t4r is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ch4t4r is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39216%2ftrademark-violation-for-app%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Where are you from? Company wise.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
I'm a private person, my app is non-commercial (no ads, no payments, no tracking) -- thus I manage it myself without a company.
– Ch4t4r
2 hours ago
That is fine, I just wondered if you had an office or anything in Turkey that would put you under Turkish laws.
– Putvi
2 hours ago
Sorry to ask, but do you have any reference for that? What you stated matches what I read but it would give me a bit of a better feeling.
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago
And to add, the app is distributed over the play store in Turkey as well but I'm not based there. The other app developer has some sort of proof of ownership from some sort of turkish ministry, but it doesn't seem to be a patent (it even states "The entitlement does not qualify, it only provides the ease of proof in determining the owner of the work", translated with Google)
– Ch4t4r
1 hour ago