Attenuator Cascaded Connection The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
"Riffle" two strings
Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
Springs with some finite mass
What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?
aging parents with no investments
How to reverse every other sublist of a list?
Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?
"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"
Monty Hall variation
I see my dog run
Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?
If a poisoned arrow's piercing damage is reduced to 0, do you still get poisoned?
On the insanity of kings as an argument against monarchy
Can distinct morphisms between curves induce the same morphism on singular cohomology?
Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid
How to change the limits of integration
Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?
Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group
What is a mixture ratio of propellant?
Geography at the pixel level
Attenuator Cascaded Connection
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
$begingroup$
PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).
Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?
I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?
rf-power electronics
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).
Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?
I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?
rf-power electronics
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).
Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?
I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?
rf-power electronics
New contributor
$endgroup$
PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).
Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?
I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?
rf-power electronics
rf-power electronics
New contributor
New contributor
edited 9 hours ago
Mike Waters♦
3,7752635
3,7752635
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
nandflash1nandflash1
252
252
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.
Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "520"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f13244%2fattenuator-cascaded-connection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.
Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.
Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.
Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!
$endgroup$
Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.
Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!
answered 8 hours ago
Brian K1LIBrian K1LI
1,747114
1,747114
$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f13244%2fattenuator-cascaded-connection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
5 hours ago