Precipitating silver(I) salts from the solution of barium(II) cyanate and iodide Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)I have 100 mg of a proteinase K lyophilized powder and I need to make it to a working concentration of 25 mg/mLHow to determine which salt will precipitate from a solution containing multiple ions?Is solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?Why should I acidify twice in the procedure for qualitative analysis of chloride anions?Adding powdered Pb and Fe to a solutionApparent solubility of Ag2C2O4 in a buffer solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyWhat is the net ionic equation of the following?How to calculate the volume or mass of carbon dioxide gas absorbed by a calcium hydroxide solution?Precipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

Antler Helmet: Can it work?

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

Did Xerox really develop the first LAN?

How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

Sorting numerically

Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?

What happens to sewage if there is no river near by?

How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?

Do you forfeit tax refunds/credits if you aren't required to and don't file by April 15?

How can players work together to take actions that are otherwise impossible?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

What are the pros and cons of Aerospike nosecones?

What are the motives behind Cersei's orders given to Bronn?

Is there a way in Ruby to make just any one out of many keyword arguments required?

Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?

Should gear shift center itself while in neutral?

Stars Make Stars

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Why is black pepper both grey and black?

When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?

How can whole tone melodies sound more interesting?

Is high blood pressure ever a symptom attributable solely to dehydration?



Precipitating silver(I) salts from the solution of barium(II) cyanate and iodide



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)I have 100 mg of a proteinase K lyophilized powder and I need to make it to a working concentration of 25 mg/mLHow to determine which salt will precipitate from a solution containing multiple ions?Is solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?Why should I acidify twice in the procedure for qualitative analysis of chloride anions?Adding powdered Pb and Fe to a solutionApparent solubility of Ag2C2O4 in a buffer solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyWhat is the net ionic equation of the following?How to calculate the volume or mass of carbon dioxide gas absorbed by a calcium hydroxide solution?Precipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride










2












$begingroup$



Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.




The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
    $endgroup$
    – user77021
    6 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    6 hours ago















2












$begingroup$



Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.




The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
    $endgroup$
    – user77021
    6 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    6 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$



Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.




The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$





Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.




The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?







inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility






share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









andselisk

19.4k664126




19.4k664126






New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









user77021user77021

111




111




New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
    $endgroup$
    – user77021
    6 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    6 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
    $endgroup$
    – user77021
    6 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    6 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
6 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$


Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.




Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.



$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar



Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be



$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.



$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar



$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is



$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$



The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is



$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$



Conclusion:



Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.



Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Alternative method to MaxW method:



    Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



    $$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$



    Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



    $$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$



    For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:



    $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



    Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.



    For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:



    $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



    Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "431"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f112803%2fprecipitating-silveri-salts-from-the-solution-of-bariumii-cyanate-and-iodide%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$


      Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



      $K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.




      Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.



      $ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar



      Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be



      $ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



      Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.



      $ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar



      $ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



      So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



      The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is



      $ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$



      The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is



      $ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$



      Conclusion:



      Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.



      Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        4












        $begingroup$


        Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



        $K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.




        Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.



        $ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar



        Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be



        $ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



        Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.



        $ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar



        $ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



        So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



        The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is



        $ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$



        The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is



        $ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$



        Conclusion:



        Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.



        Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$


          Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



          $K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.




          Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.



          $ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar



          Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be



          $ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



          Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.



          $ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar



          $ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



          So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



          The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is



          $ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$



          The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is



          $ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$



          Conclusion:



          Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.



          Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




          Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



          $K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.




          Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.



          $ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar



          Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be



          $ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



          Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.



          $ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar



          $ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$



          So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



          The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is



          $ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$



          The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is



          $ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$



          Conclusion:



          Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.



          Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 5 hours ago

























          answered 5 hours ago









          MaxWMaxW

          15.7k22261




          15.7k22261





















              1












              $begingroup$

              Alternative method to MaxW method:



              Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



              $$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$



              Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



              $$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$



              For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:



              $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



              Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.



              For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:



              $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



              Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                Alternative method to MaxW method:



                Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



                $$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$



                Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



                $$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$



                For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:



                $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



                Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.



                For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:



                $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



                Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Alternative method to MaxW method:



                  Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



                  $$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$



                  Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



                  $$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$



                  For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:



                  $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



                  Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.



                  For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:



                  $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



                  Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Alternative method to MaxW method:



                  Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



                  $$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$



                  Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



                  $$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$



                  For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:



                  $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



                  Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.



                  For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:



                  $$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$



                  Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 3 hours ago

























                  answered 3 hours ago









                  Mathew MahindaratneMathew Mahindaratne

                  6,328725




                  6,328725




















                      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f112803%2fprecipitating-silveri-salts-from-the-solution-of-bariumii-cyanate-and-iodide%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Best approach to update all entries in a list that is paginated?Best way to add items to a paginated listChoose Your Country: Best Usability approachUpdate list when a user is viewing the list without annoying themWhen would the best day to update your webpage be?What should happen when I add a Row to a paginated, sorted listShould I adopt infinite scrolling or classical pagination?How to show user that page objects automatically updateWhat is the best location to locate the comments section in a list pageBest way to combine filtering and selecting items in a listWhen one of two inputs must be updated to satisfy a consistency criteria, which should you update (if at all)?

                      Тонконіг бульбистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Екологія | Господарське значення | Примітки | Див. також | Література | Джерела | Посилання | Навігаційне меню1114601320038-241116202404kew-435458Poa bulbosaЭлектронный каталог сосудистых растений Азиатской России [Електронний каталог судинних рослин Азіатської Росії]Малышев Л. Л. Дикие родичи культурных растений. Poa bulbosa L. - Мятлик луковичный. [Малишев Л. Л. Дикі родичи культурних рослин. Poa bulbosa L. - Тонконіг бульбистий.]Мятлик (POA) Сем. Злаки (Мятликовые) [Тонконіг (POA) Род. Злаки (Тонконогові)]Poa bulbosa Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 70. 1753. 鳞茎早熟禾 lin jing zao shu he (Description from Flora of China) [Poa bulbosa Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 70. 1753. 鳞茎早熟禾 lin jing zao shu he (Опис від Флора Китаю)]Poa bulbosa L. – lipnice cibulkatá / lipnica cibulkatáPoa bulbosa в базі даних Poa bulbosa на сайті Poa bulbosa в базі даних «Global Biodiversity Information Facility» (GBIF)Poa bulbosa в базі даних «Euro + Med PlantBase» — інформаційному ресурсі для Євро-середземноморського розмаїття рослинPoa bulbosa L. на сайті «Плантариум»

                      Вунгтау (аеропорт) Загальні відомості | Див. також | Посилання | Навігаційне меню10°22′00″ пн. ш. 107°05′00″ сх. д. / 10.36667° пн. ш. 107.08333° сх. д. / 10.36667; 107.0833310°22′00″ пн. ш. 107°05′00″ сх. д. / 10.36667° пн. ш. 107.08333° сх. д. / 10.36667; 107.083337731608Vinh AirportVinh airport facelift improves serviceвиправивши або дописавши їївиправивши або дописавши їїр