Method for adding error messages to a dictionary given a key The Next CEO of Stack Overflow“Multi-key” dictionaryOutputting all possible words which fit a string of lettersCheck value from two different dictionary with matched keyDictionary of key signatures for various major and minor scalesResolving MySQL 1215 errors in a declarative MySQL migration systemSmall Chatbot challengeSimple Python script seems to stop when N >> 1Make a given number by adding given numbersAdding values from DictReader to empty dictionaryDefine the scope of negation with the Dependency Parser of spaCy

Why do remote US companies require working in the US?

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

No sign flipping while figuring out the emf of voltaic cell?

Unclear about dynamic binding

Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)

is it ok to reduce charging current for li ion 18650 battery?

How a 64-bit process virtual address space is divided in Linux?

Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?

The exact meaning of 'Mom made me a sandwich'

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?

What is the value of α and β in a triangle?

I want to delete every two lines after 3rd lines in file contain very large number of lines :

Flying from Cape Town to England and return to another province

Need help understanding a power circuit (caps and diodes)

Why is quantifier elimination desirable for a given theory?

Why does the flight controls check come before arming the autobrake on the A320?

Is it possible to replace duplicates of a character with one character using tr

Which one is the true statement?

What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

Math-accent symbol over parentheses enclosing accented symbol (amsmath)

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?



Method for adding error messages to a dictionary given a key



The Next CEO of Stack Overflow“Multi-key” dictionaryOutputting all possible words which fit a string of lettersCheck value from two different dictionary with matched keyDictionary of key signatures for various major and minor scalesResolving MySQL 1215 errors in a declarative MySQL migration systemSmall Chatbot challengeSimple Python script seems to stop when N >> 1Make a given number by adding given numbersAdding values from DictReader to empty dictionaryDefine the scope of negation with the Dependency Parser of spaCy










3












$begingroup$


I want this method to be completely understandable just from looking at the code and comments only.



def add_error(error_dict, key, err):
"""Given an error message, or a list of error messages, this method
adds it/them to a dictionary of errors.

Doctests:
>>> add_error(, 'key1', 'error1')
'key1': ['error1']
>>> add_error('key1': ['error1'], 'key1', 'error2')
'key1': ['error1', 'error2']
>>> add_error('key1': ['error1', 'error2'], 'key2', 'error1')
'key1': ['error1', 'error2'], 'key2': ['error1']
>>> add_error(, 'key1', ['error1', 'error2'])
'key1': ['error1', 'error2']
>>> add_error(, 'key1', [])

>>> add_error('key1': ['error1'], 'key2', ['error1', 'error2'])
'key1': ['error1'], 'key2': ['error1', 'error2']
>>> add_error(, 'key1', 23) # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
>>> add_error(, 'key1', [23]) # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
>>> add_error(, 'key1', ['error1', 23]) # doctest:
+IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
"""
if not isinstance(err, list):
err = [err]

if not key in error_dict and len(err) > 0:
error_dict[key] = []

for e in err:
if not isinstance(e, string_types):
raise TypeError(
'The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.'
)
error_dict[key].append(e)
return error_dict


Hopefully, the code along with the comment does the job well, but I would still appreciate review(s) of this method. One thing I always keep on wondering is whether this is too many doc-tests for such a simple method. Thanks.










share|improve this question







New contributor




darkhorse is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    I want this method to be completely understandable just from looking at the code and comments only.



    def add_error(error_dict, key, err):
    """Given an error message, or a list of error messages, this method
    adds it/them to a dictionary of errors.

    Doctests:
    >>> add_error(, 'key1', 'error1')
    'key1': ['error1']
    >>> add_error('key1': ['error1'], 'key1', 'error2')
    'key1': ['error1', 'error2']
    >>> add_error('key1': ['error1', 'error2'], 'key2', 'error1')
    'key1': ['error1', 'error2'], 'key2': ['error1']
    >>> add_error(, 'key1', ['error1', 'error2'])
    'key1': ['error1', 'error2']
    >>> add_error(, 'key1', [])

    >>> add_error('key1': ['error1'], 'key2', ['error1', 'error2'])
    'key1': ['error1'], 'key2': ['error1', 'error2']
    >>> add_error(, 'key1', 23) # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    ...
    TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
    >>> add_error(, 'key1', [23]) # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    ...
    TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
    >>> add_error(, 'key1', ['error1', 23]) # doctest:
    +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    ...
    TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
    """
    if not isinstance(err, list):
    err = [err]

    if not key in error_dict and len(err) > 0:
    error_dict[key] = []

    for e in err:
    if not isinstance(e, string_types):
    raise TypeError(
    'The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.'
    )
    error_dict[key].append(e)
    return error_dict


    Hopefully, the code along with the comment does the job well, but I would still appreciate review(s) of this method. One thing I always keep on wondering is whether this is too many doc-tests for such a simple method. Thanks.










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    darkhorse is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I want this method to be completely understandable just from looking at the code and comments only.



      def add_error(error_dict, key, err):
      """Given an error message, or a list of error messages, this method
      adds it/them to a dictionary of errors.

      Doctests:
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', 'error1')
      'key1': ['error1']
      >>> add_error('key1': ['error1'], 'key1', 'error2')
      'key1': ['error1', 'error2']
      >>> add_error('key1': ['error1', 'error2'], 'key2', 'error1')
      'key1': ['error1', 'error2'], 'key2': ['error1']
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', ['error1', 'error2'])
      'key1': ['error1', 'error2']
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', [])

      >>> add_error('key1': ['error1'], 'key2', ['error1', 'error2'])
      'key1': ['error1'], 'key2': ['error1', 'error2']
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', 23) # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      ...
      TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', [23]) # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      ...
      TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', ['error1', 23]) # doctest:
      +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      ...
      TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
      """
      if not isinstance(err, list):
      err = [err]

      if not key in error_dict and len(err) > 0:
      error_dict[key] = []

      for e in err:
      if not isinstance(e, string_types):
      raise TypeError(
      'The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.'
      )
      error_dict[key].append(e)
      return error_dict


      Hopefully, the code along with the comment does the job well, but I would still appreciate review(s) of this method. One thing I always keep on wondering is whether this is too many doc-tests for such a simple method. Thanks.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      darkhorse is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I want this method to be completely understandable just from looking at the code and comments only.



      def add_error(error_dict, key, err):
      """Given an error message, or a list of error messages, this method
      adds it/them to a dictionary of errors.

      Doctests:
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', 'error1')
      'key1': ['error1']
      >>> add_error('key1': ['error1'], 'key1', 'error2')
      'key1': ['error1', 'error2']
      >>> add_error('key1': ['error1', 'error2'], 'key2', 'error1')
      'key1': ['error1', 'error2'], 'key2': ['error1']
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', ['error1', 'error2'])
      'key1': ['error1', 'error2']
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', [])

      >>> add_error('key1': ['error1'], 'key2', ['error1', 'error2'])
      'key1': ['error1'], 'key2': ['error1', 'error2']
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', 23) # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      ...
      TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', [23]) # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      ...
      TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
      >>> add_error(, 'key1', ['error1', 23]) # doctest:
      +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      ...
      TypeError: The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.
      """
      if not isinstance(err, list):
      err = [err]

      if not key in error_dict and len(err) > 0:
      error_dict[key] = []

      for e in err:
      if not isinstance(e, string_types):
      raise TypeError(
      'The error(s) must be a string, or a list of strings.'
      )
      error_dict[key].append(e)
      return error_dict


      Hopefully, the code along with the comment does the job well, but I would still appreciate review(s) of this method. One thing I always keep on wondering is whether this is too many doc-tests for such a simple method. Thanks.







      python python-3.x






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      darkhorse is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      darkhorse is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      darkhorse is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      darkhorsedarkhorse

      1534




      1534




      New contributor




      darkhorse is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      darkhorse is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      darkhorse is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Consider narrowing accepted types



          This might not be possible based on the context of your code, but if it is: arguments sharing one of many different types hinders and complicates testability and maintainability. There are many different solutions to this that will help this situation; one is accepting variadic arguments - i.e.



          def add_error(error_dict, key, *errs):


          This is still easily invocable without needing to wrap a single error in a list.



          Use x not in instead of not x in



          i.e.



          if key not in error_dict


          Lose your loop



          and also lose your empty-list assignment, instead doing



          error_dict.setdefault(key, []).extend(err)


          If you use the variadic suggestion above, your entire function becomes that one line.



          Immutable or not?



          Currently you do two things - alter a dictionary and return it - when you should only pick one. Either make a copy of the dict and return an altered version, or modify the dict and don't return anything.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            congratulations on writing a fairly clear, readable function! (And welcome!)



            What types do you take?



            You explicitly check for an instance of type list. I think you should invert your check, and look for a string type instead. The reason is that it would enable you to accept iterables other than list as your errors.



            For example, you would be able to do something like:



            add_error(edict, 'key', (str(e) for e in ...))


            That last parameter is not a list, but it is something you might want to do. Also, *args is not a list but a tuple - you might want to splat a tuple rather than converting it to a list first.



            What types do you take?



            Your key parameter is always tested as a string. But dicts can have other key-types than string, and you neither test those, nor do you appear to have coded any kind of rejection on that basis. I suggest you add some tests that demonstrate your intent: is it okay to use non-strings as keys, or not?



            What constraints exist on the errors?



            I don't see any indication of what happens when duplicate errors are added. Is this intended to be allowed, or not?



            What constraints exist on the keys?



            Is it okay to use None as a key? How about '' (empty string)? Tests, please.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              );
              );
              , "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "196"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              darkhorse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216535%2fmethod-for-adding-error-messages-to-a-dictionary-given-a-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              Consider narrowing accepted types



              This might not be possible based on the context of your code, but if it is: arguments sharing one of many different types hinders and complicates testability and maintainability. There are many different solutions to this that will help this situation; one is accepting variadic arguments - i.e.



              def add_error(error_dict, key, *errs):


              This is still easily invocable without needing to wrap a single error in a list.



              Use x not in instead of not x in



              i.e.



              if key not in error_dict


              Lose your loop



              and also lose your empty-list assignment, instead doing



              error_dict.setdefault(key, []).extend(err)


              If you use the variadic suggestion above, your entire function becomes that one line.



              Immutable or not?



              Currently you do two things - alter a dictionary and return it - when you should only pick one. Either make a copy of the dict and return an altered version, or modify the dict and don't return anything.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                Consider narrowing accepted types



                This might not be possible based on the context of your code, but if it is: arguments sharing one of many different types hinders and complicates testability and maintainability. There are many different solutions to this that will help this situation; one is accepting variadic arguments - i.e.



                def add_error(error_dict, key, *errs):


                This is still easily invocable without needing to wrap a single error in a list.



                Use x not in instead of not x in



                i.e.



                if key not in error_dict


                Lose your loop



                and also lose your empty-list assignment, instead doing



                error_dict.setdefault(key, []).extend(err)


                If you use the variadic suggestion above, your entire function becomes that one line.



                Immutable or not?



                Currently you do two things - alter a dictionary and return it - when you should only pick one. Either make a copy of the dict and return an altered version, or modify the dict and don't return anything.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Consider narrowing accepted types



                  This might not be possible based on the context of your code, but if it is: arguments sharing one of many different types hinders and complicates testability and maintainability. There are many different solutions to this that will help this situation; one is accepting variadic arguments - i.e.



                  def add_error(error_dict, key, *errs):


                  This is still easily invocable without needing to wrap a single error in a list.



                  Use x not in instead of not x in



                  i.e.



                  if key not in error_dict


                  Lose your loop



                  and also lose your empty-list assignment, instead doing



                  error_dict.setdefault(key, []).extend(err)


                  If you use the variadic suggestion above, your entire function becomes that one line.



                  Immutable or not?



                  Currently you do two things - alter a dictionary and return it - when you should only pick one. Either make a copy of the dict and return an altered version, or modify the dict and don't return anything.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Consider narrowing accepted types



                  This might not be possible based on the context of your code, but if it is: arguments sharing one of many different types hinders and complicates testability and maintainability. There are many different solutions to this that will help this situation; one is accepting variadic arguments - i.e.



                  def add_error(error_dict, key, *errs):


                  This is still easily invocable without needing to wrap a single error in a list.



                  Use x not in instead of not x in



                  i.e.



                  if key not in error_dict


                  Lose your loop



                  and also lose your empty-list assignment, instead doing



                  error_dict.setdefault(key, []).extend(err)


                  If you use the variadic suggestion above, your entire function becomes that one line.



                  Immutable or not?



                  Currently you do two things - alter a dictionary and return it - when you should only pick one. Either make a copy of the dict and return an altered version, or modify the dict and don't return anything.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  ReinderienReinderien

                  4,965925




                  4,965925























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      congratulations on writing a fairly clear, readable function! (And welcome!)



                      What types do you take?



                      You explicitly check for an instance of type list. I think you should invert your check, and look for a string type instead. The reason is that it would enable you to accept iterables other than list as your errors.



                      For example, you would be able to do something like:



                      add_error(edict, 'key', (str(e) for e in ...))


                      That last parameter is not a list, but it is something you might want to do. Also, *args is not a list but a tuple - you might want to splat a tuple rather than converting it to a list first.



                      What types do you take?



                      Your key parameter is always tested as a string. But dicts can have other key-types than string, and you neither test those, nor do you appear to have coded any kind of rejection on that basis. I suggest you add some tests that demonstrate your intent: is it okay to use non-strings as keys, or not?



                      What constraints exist on the errors?



                      I don't see any indication of what happens when duplicate errors are added. Is this intended to be allowed, or not?



                      What constraints exist on the keys?



                      Is it okay to use None as a key? How about '' (empty string)? Tests, please.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        congratulations on writing a fairly clear, readable function! (And welcome!)



                        What types do you take?



                        You explicitly check for an instance of type list. I think you should invert your check, and look for a string type instead. The reason is that it would enable you to accept iterables other than list as your errors.



                        For example, you would be able to do something like:



                        add_error(edict, 'key', (str(e) for e in ...))


                        That last parameter is not a list, but it is something you might want to do. Also, *args is not a list but a tuple - you might want to splat a tuple rather than converting it to a list first.



                        What types do you take?



                        Your key parameter is always tested as a string. But dicts can have other key-types than string, and you neither test those, nor do you appear to have coded any kind of rejection on that basis. I suggest you add some tests that demonstrate your intent: is it okay to use non-strings as keys, or not?



                        What constraints exist on the errors?



                        I don't see any indication of what happens when duplicate errors are added. Is this intended to be allowed, or not?



                        What constraints exist on the keys?



                        Is it okay to use None as a key? How about '' (empty string)? Tests, please.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          congratulations on writing a fairly clear, readable function! (And welcome!)



                          What types do you take?



                          You explicitly check for an instance of type list. I think you should invert your check, and look for a string type instead. The reason is that it would enable you to accept iterables other than list as your errors.



                          For example, you would be able to do something like:



                          add_error(edict, 'key', (str(e) for e in ...))


                          That last parameter is not a list, but it is something you might want to do. Also, *args is not a list but a tuple - you might want to splat a tuple rather than converting it to a list first.



                          What types do you take?



                          Your key parameter is always tested as a string. But dicts can have other key-types than string, and you neither test those, nor do you appear to have coded any kind of rejection on that basis. I suggest you add some tests that demonstrate your intent: is it okay to use non-strings as keys, or not?



                          What constraints exist on the errors?



                          I don't see any indication of what happens when duplicate errors are added. Is this intended to be allowed, or not?



                          What constraints exist on the keys?



                          Is it okay to use None as a key? How about '' (empty string)? Tests, please.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          congratulations on writing a fairly clear, readable function! (And welcome!)



                          What types do you take?



                          You explicitly check for an instance of type list. I think you should invert your check, and look for a string type instead. The reason is that it would enable you to accept iterables other than list as your errors.



                          For example, you would be able to do something like:



                          add_error(edict, 'key', (str(e) for e in ...))


                          That last parameter is not a list, but it is something you might want to do. Also, *args is not a list but a tuple - you might want to splat a tuple rather than converting it to a list first.



                          What types do you take?



                          Your key parameter is always tested as a string. But dicts can have other key-types than string, and you neither test those, nor do you appear to have coded any kind of rejection on that basis. I suggest you add some tests that demonstrate your intent: is it okay to use non-strings as keys, or not?



                          What constraints exist on the errors?



                          I don't see any indication of what happens when duplicate errors are added. Is this intended to be allowed, or not?



                          What constraints exist on the keys?



                          Is it okay to use None as a key? How about '' (empty string)? Tests, please.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 20 mins ago









                          Austin HastingsAustin Hastings

                          7,5571233




                          7,5571233




















                              darkhorse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              darkhorse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              darkhorse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              darkhorse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216535%2fmethod-for-adding-error-messages-to-a-dictionary-given-a-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can not update quote_id field of “quote_item” table magento 2Magento 2.1 - We can't remove the item. (Shopping Cart doesnt allow us to remove items before becomes empty)Add value for custom quote item attribute using REST apiREST API endpoint v1/carts/cartId/items always returns error messageCorrect way to save entries to databaseHow to remove all associated quote objects of a customer completelyMagento 2 - Save value from custom input field to quote_itemGet quote_item data using quote id and product id filter in Magento 2How to set additional data to quote_item table from controller in Magento 2?What is the purpose of additional_data column in quote_item table in magento2Set Custom Price to Quote item magento2 from controller

                              How to solve knockout JS error in Magento 2 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?(Magento2) knockout.js:3012 Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process bindingUnable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Cannot read property `scopeLabel` of undefined on Product Detail PageCan't get Customer Data on frontend in Magento 2Magento2 Order Summary - unable to process bindingKO templates are not loading in Magento 2.1 applicationgetting knockout js error magento 2Product grid not load -— Unable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Product form not loaded in magento2Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process binding “if: function()return (isShowLegend()) ” magento 2

                              Nissan Patrol Зміст Перше покоління — 4W60 (1951-1960) | Друге покоління — 60 series (1960-1980) | Третє покоління (1980–2002) | Четверте покоління — Y60 (1987–1998) | П'яте покоління — Y61 (1997–2013) | Шосте покоління — Y62 (2010- ) | Посилання | Зноски | Навігаційне менюОфіційний український сайтТест-драйв Nissan Patrol 2010 7-го поколінняNissan PatrolКак мы тестировали Nissan Patrol 2016рвиправивши або дописавши її