Fourth person (in Slavey language)What languages are the most similar to English?Grammar framework features that are not supported cross-linguisticallyBefore being borrowed by Europeans, was “hurricane” ever pronounced with an initial “f”?Why did English change so rapidly between the late 1600s and the early 1700s?Distinguishing between a symbol-based language and a frequency-based language?Does anyone know if there are plans for a 'successor' to Huddleston and Pullum (CamGEL or CGEL)?Explaining Grammatical “Mood” for the LaymenWhy Creole languages aren't the defaultHow to construct a grammar given a text and a dictionaryCan Native Americans of different linguistic background still communicate using sign language?

Why is there a voltage between the mains ground and my radiator?

How do I locate a classical quotation?

What do you call the air that rushes into your car in the highway?

What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?

How strictly should I take "Candidates must be local"?

Force user to remove USB token

Does "variables should live in the smallest scope as possible" include the case "variables should not exist if possible"?

Subset counting for even numbers

Good allowance savings plan?

Aliens englobed the Solar System: will we notice?

PTIJ: Why can't I eat anything?

Examples of a statistic that is not independent of sample's distribution?

In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?

Do items de-spawn in Diablo?

Does splitting a potentially monolithic application into several smaller ones help prevent bugs?

Can someone explain what is being said here in color publishing in the American Mathematical Monthly?

Why don't MCU characters ever seem to have language issues?

Algorithm to convert a fixed-length string to the smallest possible collision-free representation?

Single word request: Harming the benefactor

Why would a jet engine that runs at temps excess of 2000°C burn when it crashes?

Am I not good enough for you?

Does a Catoblepas statblock appear in an official D&D 5e product?

My story is written in English, but is set in my home country. What language should I use for the dialogue?

Rejected in 4th interview round citing insufficient years of experience



Fourth person (in Slavey language)


What languages are the most similar to English?Grammar framework features that are not supported cross-linguisticallyBefore being borrowed by Europeans, was “hurricane” ever pronounced with an initial “f”?Why did English change so rapidly between the late 1600s and the early 1700s?Distinguishing between a symbol-based language and a frequency-based language?Does anyone know if there are plans for a 'successor' to Huddleston and Pullum (CamGEL or CGEL)?Explaining Grammatical “Mood” for the LaymenWhy Creole languages aren't the defaultHow to construct a grammar given a text and a dictionaryCan Native Americans of different linguistic background still communicate using sign language?













9















I was reading a Wikipedia article about the Slavey (Slave) language in Canada, and it says that Slavey has first, second, third and fourth person. I've never heard about a language having a fourth person, so I was just wondering if someone here knows when is this used and how it works? Or, since it isn't very likely you're familiar with this particular language, just in general, what does a fourth person in a language denote?










share|improve this question






















  • Yes. Other languages with this feature include many of the indigenous languages of Canada. Even completely unrelated languages, Salish, Algonquian, Inuit. I have no idea why this feature is so strongly areal.

    – Wilson
    8 hours ago















9















I was reading a Wikipedia article about the Slavey (Slave) language in Canada, and it says that Slavey has first, second, third and fourth person. I've never heard about a language having a fourth person, so I was just wondering if someone here knows when is this used and how it works? Or, since it isn't very likely you're familiar with this particular language, just in general, what does a fourth person in a language denote?










share|improve this question






















  • Yes. Other languages with this feature include many of the indigenous languages of Canada. Even completely unrelated languages, Salish, Algonquian, Inuit. I have no idea why this feature is so strongly areal.

    – Wilson
    8 hours ago













9












9








9


1






I was reading a Wikipedia article about the Slavey (Slave) language in Canada, and it says that Slavey has first, second, third and fourth person. I've never heard about a language having a fourth person, so I was just wondering if someone here knows when is this used and how it works? Or, since it isn't very likely you're familiar with this particular language, just in general, what does a fourth person in a language denote?










share|improve this question














I was reading a Wikipedia article about the Slavey (Slave) language in Canada, and it says that Slavey has first, second, third and fourth person. I've never heard about a language having a fourth person, so I was just wondering if someone here knows when is this used and how it works? Or, since it isn't very likely you're familiar with this particular language, just in general, what does a fourth person in a language denote?







grammar linguistic-typology american-languages






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 12 hours ago









lmclmc

326211




326211












  • Yes. Other languages with this feature include many of the indigenous languages of Canada. Even completely unrelated languages, Salish, Algonquian, Inuit. I have no idea why this feature is so strongly areal.

    – Wilson
    8 hours ago

















  • Yes. Other languages with this feature include many of the indigenous languages of Canada. Even completely unrelated languages, Salish, Algonquian, Inuit. I have no idea why this feature is so strongly areal.

    – Wilson
    8 hours ago
















Yes. Other languages with this feature include many of the indigenous languages of Canada. Even completely unrelated languages, Salish, Algonquian, Inuit. I have no idea why this feature is so strongly areal.

– Wilson
8 hours ago





Yes. Other languages with this feature include many of the indigenous languages of Canada. Even completely unrelated languages, Salish, Algonquian, Inuit. I have no idea why this feature is so strongly areal.

– Wilson
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10














The fourth person is a (rare) synonym for the obviative. In languages with this feature, when there are two third-person referents and one of them is less salient, the less salient one may be marked as obviative and the more salient one as proximative. According to Rice (1989), the fourth-person pronoun go- is used for objects when the subject is third person (sorry, the source doesn't provide morpheme boundaries or a morpheme-by-morpheme gloss, and I'm not familiar with American languages):



(1) nágoneht'u
'S/he is hitting them(human).'


The fourth-person pronoun ye- is used for third-person direct nonhuman objects when the subject is third person, as a fourth-person possessor (Rice doesn't go into much detail about this use), and used for third-person oblique arguments whose subjects are animate and in the third person:



(2) rígodéhtá
'S/he is counting them(human).'
(The e is nasalised - no idea how to type the Americanist symbol, sorry)
(3) yeyíe káidhah
4.guts
(Again, the i is nasalised, and the gloss for the second word is also missing in the main text.)
(4) yegts'é rádí
4.to 3.gives.help
'S/he helps him/her.'


References:
Rice, K. (1989). A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.






share|improve this answer

























  • For a typical Algonkian obviative system, see Obviation, Inversion, and Topic Rank in Ojibwa, by Richard Rhodes.

    – jlawler
    6 hours ago


















0














As a layman in linguistics I found this explanation pretty illuminating:




In English, when we have a non-SAP (speech act participants) involved in the discourse, there is the potential for ambiguity. For example, consider:



“John was in a tizzy last night and got into a fight with Bill. He hit him so hard that he broke his jaw.”



Here, it isn’t clear that who broke whose jaw.*



In languages with what’s called an “obviative” system, however, there is a means of marking two different 3rd persons such that the doer and the doee of an action are clear, even when there are only pronouns in the phrase. These two types are often called 3rd person (or “proximate”) and 4th person (or “obviate”). The details of these systems vary a bit from language to language, but in the broadest strokes, the proximate 3rd person is the topic of the discourse, while the obviative 4th person is used for everything else.







share|improve this answer






























    -4















    Block Block quite the adventure for you







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Mohd Zamri Mahamad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.



















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "312"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30864%2ffourth-person-in-slavey-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      10














      The fourth person is a (rare) synonym for the obviative. In languages with this feature, when there are two third-person referents and one of them is less salient, the less salient one may be marked as obviative and the more salient one as proximative. According to Rice (1989), the fourth-person pronoun go- is used for objects when the subject is third person (sorry, the source doesn't provide morpheme boundaries or a morpheme-by-morpheme gloss, and I'm not familiar with American languages):



      (1) nágoneht'u
      'S/he is hitting them(human).'


      The fourth-person pronoun ye- is used for third-person direct nonhuman objects when the subject is third person, as a fourth-person possessor (Rice doesn't go into much detail about this use), and used for third-person oblique arguments whose subjects are animate and in the third person:



      (2) rígodéhtá
      'S/he is counting them(human).'
      (The e is nasalised - no idea how to type the Americanist symbol, sorry)
      (3) yeyíe káidhah
      4.guts
      (Again, the i is nasalised, and the gloss for the second word is also missing in the main text.)
      (4) yegts'é rádí
      4.to 3.gives.help
      'S/he helps him/her.'


      References:
      Rice, K. (1989). A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.






      share|improve this answer

























      • For a typical Algonkian obviative system, see Obviation, Inversion, and Topic Rank in Ojibwa, by Richard Rhodes.

        – jlawler
        6 hours ago















      10














      The fourth person is a (rare) synonym for the obviative. In languages with this feature, when there are two third-person referents and one of them is less salient, the less salient one may be marked as obviative and the more salient one as proximative. According to Rice (1989), the fourth-person pronoun go- is used for objects when the subject is third person (sorry, the source doesn't provide morpheme boundaries or a morpheme-by-morpheme gloss, and I'm not familiar with American languages):



      (1) nágoneht'u
      'S/he is hitting them(human).'


      The fourth-person pronoun ye- is used for third-person direct nonhuman objects when the subject is third person, as a fourth-person possessor (Rice doesn't go into much detail about this use), and used for third-person oblique arguments whose subjects are animate and in the third person:



      (2) rígodéhtá
      'S/he is counting them(human).'
      (The e is nasalised - no idea how to type the Americanist symbol, sorry)
      (3) yeyíe káidhah
      4.guts
      (Again, the i is nasalised, and the gloss for the second word is also missing in the main text.)
      (4) yegts'é rádí
      4.to 3.gives.help
      'S/he helps him/her.'


      References:
      Rice, K. (1989). A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.






      share|improve this answer

























      • For a typical Algonkian obviative system, see Obviation, Inversion, and Topic Rank in Ojibwa, by Richard Rhodes.

        – jlawler
        6 hours ago













      10












      10








      10







      The fourth person is a (rare) synonym for the obviative. In languages with this feature, when there are two third-person referents and one of them is less salient, the less salient one may be marked as obviative and the more salient one as proximative. According to Rice (1989), the fourth-person pronoun go- is used for objects when the subject is third person (sorry, the source doesn't provide morpheme boundaries or a morpheme-by-morpheme gloss, and I'm not familiar with American languages):



      (1) nágoneht'u
      'S/he is hitting them(human).'


      The fourth-person pronoun ye- is used for third-person direct nonhuman objects when the subject is third person, as a fourth-person possessor (Rice doesn't go into much detail about this use), and used for third-person oblique arguments whose subjects are animate and in the third person:



      (2) rígodéhtá
      'S/he is counting them(human).'
      (The e is nasalised - no idea how to type the Americanist symbol, sorry)
      (3) yeyíe káidhah
      4.guts
      (Again, the i is nasalised, and the gloss for the second word is also missing in the main text.)
      (4) yegts'é rádí
      4.to 3.gives.help
      'S/he helps him/her.'


      References:
      Rice, K. (1989). A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.






      share|improve this answer















      The fourth person is a (rare) synonym for the obviative. In languages with this feature, when there are two third-person referents and one of them is less salient, the less salient one may be marked as obviative and the more salient one as proximative. According to Rice (1989), the fourth-person pronoun go- is used for objects when the subject is third person (sorry, the source doesn't provide morpheme boundaries or a morpheme-by-morpheme gloss, and I'm not familiar with American languages):



      (1) nágoneht'u
      'S/he is hitting them(human).'


      The fourth-person pronoun ye- is used for third-person direct nonhuman objects when the subject is third person, as a fourth-person possessor (Rice doesn't go into much detail about this use), and used for third-person oblique arguments whose subjects are animate and in the third person:



      (2) rígodéhtá
      'S/he is counting them(human).'
      (The e is nasalised - no idea how to type the Americanist symbol, sorry)
      (3) yeyíe káidhah
      4.guts
      (Again, the i is nasalised, and the gloss for the second word is also missing in the main text.)
      (4) yegts'é rádí
      4.to 3.gives.help
      'S/he helps him/her.'


      References:
      Rice, K. (1989). A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 11 hours ago

























      answered 12 hours ago









      WavesWashSandsWavesWashSands

      2,2261029




      2,2261029












      • For a typical Algonkian obviative system, see Obviation, Inversion, and Topic Rank in Ojibwa, by Richard Rhodes.

        – jlawler
        6 hours ago

















      • For a typical Algonkian obviative system, see Obviation, Inversion, and Topic Rank in Ojibwa, by Richard Rhodes.

        – jlawler
        6 hours ago
















      For a typical Algonkian obviative system, see Obviation, Inversion, and Topic Rank in Ojibwa, by Richard Rhodes.

      – jlawler
      6 hours ago





      For a typical Algonkian obviative system, see Obviation, Inversion, and Topic Rank in Ojibwa, by Richard Rhodes.

      – jlawler
      6 hours ago











      0














      As a layman in linguistics I found this explanation pretty illuminating:




      In English, when we have a non-SAP (speech act participants) involved in the discourse, there is the potential for ambiguity. For example, consider:



      “John was in a tizzy last night and got into a fight with Bill. He hit him so hard that he broke his jaw.”



      Here, it isn’t clear that who broke whose jaw.*



      In languages with what’s called an “obviative” system, however, there is a means of marking two different 3rd persons such that the doer and the doee of an action are clear, even when there are only pronouns in the phrase. These two types are often called 3rd person (or “proximate”) and 4th person (or “obviate”). The details of these systems vary a bit from language to language, but in the broadest strokes, the proximate 3rd person is the topic of the discourse, while the obviative 4th person is used for everything else.







      share|improve this answer



























        0














        As a layman in linguistics I found this explanation pretty illuminating:




        In English, when we have a non-SAP (speech act participants) involved in the discourse, there is the potential for ambiguity. For example, consider:



        “John was in a tizzy last night and got into a fight with Bill. He hit him so hard that he broke his jaw.”



        Here, it isn’t clear that who broke whose jaw.*



        In languages with what’s called an “obviative” system, however, there is a means of marking two different 3rd persons such that the doer and the doee of an action are clear, even when there are only pronouns in the phrase. These two types are often called 3rd person (or “proximate”) and 4th person (or “obviate”). The details of these systems vary a bit from language to language, but in the broadest strokes, the proximate 3rd person is the topic of the discourse, while the obviative 4th person is used for everything else.







        share|improve this answer

























          0












          0








          0







          As a layman in linguistics I found this explanation pretty illuminating:




          In English, when we have a non-SAP (speech act participants) involved in the discourse, there is the potential for ambiguity. For example, consider:



          “John was in a tizzy last night and got into a fight with Bill. He hit him so hard that he broke his jaw.”



          Here, it isn’t clear that who broke whose jaw.*



          In languages with what’s called an “obviative” system, however, there is a means of marking two different 3rd persons such that the doer and the doee of an action are clear, even when there are only pronouns in the phrase. These two types are often called 3rd person (or “proximate”) and 4th person (or “obviate”). The details of these systems vary a bit from language to language, but in the broadest strokes, the proximate 3rd person is the topic of the discourse, while the obviative 4th person is used for everything else.







          share|improve this answer













          As a layman in linguistics I found this explanation pretty illuminating:




          In English, when we have a non-SAP (speech act participants) involved in the discourse, there is the potential for ambiguity. For example, consider:



          “John was in a tizzy last night and got into a fight with Bill. He hit him so hard that he broke his jaw.”



          Here, it isn’t clear that who broke whose jaw.*



          In languages with what’s called an “obviative” system, however, there is a means of marking two different 3rd persons such that the doer and the doee of an action are clear, even when there are only pronouns in the phrase. These two types are often called 3rd person (or “proximate”) and 4th person (or “obviate”). The details of these systems vary a bit from language to language, but in the broadest strokes, the proximate 3rd person is the topic of the discourse, while the obviative 4th person is used for everything else.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          Andrew SavinykhAndrew Savinykh

          1064




          1064





















              -4















              Block Block quite the adventure for you







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Mohd Zamri Mahamad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                -4















                Block Block quite the adventure for you







                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Mohd Zamri Mahamad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                  -4












                  -4








                  -4








                  Block Block quite the adventure for you







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Mohd Zamri Mahamad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.











                  Block Block quite the adventure for you








                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Mohd Zamri Mahamad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Mohd Zamri Mahamad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 6 hours ago









                  Mohd Zamri MahamadMohd Zamri Mahamad

                  1




                  1




                  New contributor




                  Mohd Zamri Mahamad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Mohd Zamri Mahamad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Mohd Zamri Mahamad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30864%2ffourth-person-in-slavey-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Magento 2 duplicate PHPSESSID cookie when using session_start() in custom php scriptMagento 2: User cant logged in into to account page, no error showing!Magento duplicate on subdomainGrabbing storeview from cookie (after using language selector)How do I run php custom script on magento2Magento 2: Include PHP script in headerSession lock after using Cm_RedisSessionscript php to update stockMagento set cookie popupMagento 2 session id cookie - where to find it?How to import Configurable product from csv with custom attributes using php scriptMagento 2 run custom PHP script

                      Can not update quote_id field of “quote_item” table magento 2Magento 2.1 - We can't remove the item. (Shopping Cart doesnt allow us to remove items before becomes empty)Add value for custom quote item attribute using REST apiREST API endpoint v1/carts/cartId/items always returns error messageCorrect way to save entries to databaseHow to remove all associated quote objects of a customer completelyMagento 2 - Save value from custom input field to quote_itemGet quote_item data using quote id and product id filter in Magento 2How to set additional data to quote_item table from controller in Magento 2?What is the purpose of additional_data column in quote_item table in magento2Set Custom Price to Quote item magento2 from controller

                      How to solve knockout JS error in Magento 2 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?(Magento2) knockout.js:3012 Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process bindingUnable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Cannot read property `scopeLabel` of undefined on Product Detail PageCan't get Customer Data on frontend in Magento 2Magento2 Order Summary - unable to process bindingKO templates are not loading in Magento 2.1 applicationgetting knockout js error magento 2Product grid not load -— Unable to process binding Knockout.js magento 2Product form not loaded in magento2Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to process binding “if: function()return (isShowLegend()) ” magento 2