An unused reference in research paperPublishing Same Research Paper on a National Conference as well as International IEEE conferenceChanging the title of a research paper before the submission of the camera-ready versionWhat will happen to my paper if the status of the accepted paper is “AAR” in a IEEE conferenceShould the distinction between bibliography and reference be maintained when writing a paper?How much can you trust a reference of a paper that is not availableDo I need to add answers to the reviewers’ comments to a conference paper?At what stage should acknowledgements be inserted into the paper if review is not double-blind?Performing minor corrections in a paper after camera-ready deadlineIs it ok to write a follow-up paper for a paper which has been accepted but not available online yet?References must be cited vs. need not be cited
Why should universal income be universal?
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
creating a ":KeepCursor" command
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
Using substitution ciphers to generate new alphabets in a novel
How does a computer interpret real numbers?
Is aluminum electrical wire used on aircraft?
System.QueryException unexpected token
Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience
Temporarily disable WLAN internet access for children, but allow it for adults
Can a college of swords bard use blade flourish on an OA from dissonant whispers?
Can a Canadian Travel to the USA twice, less than 180 days each time?
What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?
What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile
Why "had" in "[something] we would have made had we used [something]"?
Is there an injective, monotonically increasing, strictly concave function from the reals, to the reals?
How do apertures which seem too large to physically fit work?
Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density
How to cover method return statement in Apex Class?
putting logo on same line but after title, latex
Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country
Non-trope happy ending?
Lowest total scrabble score
Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?
An unused reference in research paper
Publishing Same Research Paper on a National Conference as well as International IEEE conferenceChanging the title of a research paper before the submission of the camera-ready versionWhat will happen to my paper if the status of the accepted paper is “AAR” in a IEEE conferenceShould the distinction between bibliography and reference be maintained when writing a paper?How much can you trust a reference of a paper that is not availableDo I need to add answers to the reviewers’ comments to a conference paper?At what stage should acknowledgements be inserted into the paper if review is not double-blind?Performing minor corrections in a paper after camera-ready deadlineIs it ok to write a follow-up paper for a paper which has been accepted but not available online yet?References must be cited vs. need not be cited
I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference section of paper which is not reference the text.
for example:
This result1 is cited from [1].
This result2 is cited from [4].
In reference section
[1] cited from here
[2] cited from here
[3] cited from here
[4] cited from here
But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.
Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?
publications
edited 4 hours ago
Azor Ahai
4,76411841
asked 5 hours ago
Gopal ojhaGopal ojha
1114
New contributor
Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference section of paper which is not reference the text.
for example:
This result1 is cited from [1].
This result2 is cited from [4].
In reference section
[1] cited from here
[2] cited from here
[3] cited from here
[4] cited from here
But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.
Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?
publications
edited 4 hours ago
Azor Ahai
4,76411841
asked 5 hours ago
Gopal ojhaGopal ojha
1114
New contributor
Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference section of paper which is not reference the text.
for example:
This result1 is cited from [1].
This result2 is cited from [4].
In reference section
[1] cited from here
[2] cited from here
[3] cited from here
[4] cited from here
But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.
Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?
publications
edited 4 hours ago
Azor Ahai
4,76411841
asked 5 hours ago
Gopal ojhaGopal ojha
1114
New contributor
Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference section of paper which is not reference the text.
for example:
This result1 is cited from [1].
This result2 is cited from [4].
In reference section
[1] cited from here
[2] cited from here
[3] cited from here
[4] cited from here
But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.
Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?
publications
publications
edited 4 hours ago
Azor Ahai
4,76411841
asked 5 hours ago
Gopal ojhaGopal ojha
1114
New contributor
Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 4 hours ago
Azor Ahai
4,76411841
asked 5 hours ago
Gopal ojhaGopal ojha
1114
New contributor
Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 4 hours ago
Azor Ahai
4,76411841
edited 4 hours ago
Azor Ahai
4,76411841
edited 4 hours ago
Azor Ahai
4,76411841
4,76411841
asked 5 hours ago
Gopal ojhaGopal ojha
1114
New contributor
Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
Gopal ojhaGopal ojha
1114
asked 5 hours ago
Gopal ojhaGopal ojha
1114
1114
New contributor
Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
54k16175268
add a comment |
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
answered 3 hours ago
henninghenning
18.4k46495
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
24 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126914%2fan-unused-reference-in-research-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
54k16175268
add a comment |
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
54k16175268
add a comment |
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
54k16175268
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
54k16175268
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
54k16175268
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
54k16175268
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
54k16175268
54k16175268
add a comment |
add a comment |
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
answered 3 hours ago
henninghenning
18.4k46495
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
24 mins ago
add a comment |
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
answered 3 hours ago
henninghenning
18.4k46495
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
24 mins ago
add a comment |
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
answered 3 hours ago
henninghenning
18.4k46495
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
answered 3 hours ago
henninghenning
18.4k46495
answered 3 hours ago
henninghenning
18.4k46495
answered 3 hours ago
henninghenning
18.4k46495
answered 3 hours ago
henninghenning
18.4k46495
18.4k46495
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
24 mins ago
add a comment |
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
24 mins ago
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
24 mins ago
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
24 mins ago
add a comment |
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126914%2fan-unused-reference-in-research-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
