PTIJ: Why do we make a Lulav holder?Purim and Shushan PurimParashat TzavWhat is the traditional Jewish name for this dish?PtIJ: why a twisted 6PTIJ: Why does Hashem have an onionPTIJ: OTD DocumentariesPTIJ: How to make a palace out of peoplePTIJ: Why did the Torah forbid itself?PTIJ: Why can't I eat anything?PTIJ: Why did Mordecai wax his surfboard?PTIJ: Why is Rav Yitzchak's name backwards?PTIJ: Why do we blow Shofar on Rosh Hashana and use a Lulav on Sukkos?
Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?
PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?
What are the rules for concealing thieves' tools (or items in general)?
Exposing a company lying about themselves in a tightly knit industry: Is my career at risk on the long run?
Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?
Gauss brackets with double vertical lines
What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?
Could any one tell what PN is this Chip? Thanks~
Fair way to split coins
Why doesn't the fusion process of the sun speed up?
Knife as defense against stray dogs
Determine voltage drop over 10G resistors with cheap multimeter
Help with identifying unique aircraft over NE Pennsylvania
When did hardware antialiasing start being available?
Why are there no stars visible in cislunar space?
Exit shell with shortcut (not typing exit) that closes session properly
Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?
How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?
What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?
Which partition to make active?
CLI: Get information Ubuntu releases
When should a starting writer get his own webpage?
Imaginary part of expression too difficult to calculate
Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks
PTIJ: Why do we make a Lulav holder?
Purim and Shushan PurimParashat TzavWhat is the traditional Jewish name for this dish?PtIJ: why a twisted 6PTIJ: Why does Hashem have an onionPTIJ: OTD DocumentariesPTIJ: How to make a palace out of peoplePTIJ: Why did the Torah forbid itself?PTIJ: Why can't I eat anything?PTIJ: Why did Mordecai wax his surfboard?PTIJ: Why is Rav Yitzchak's name backwards?PTIJ: Why do we blow Shofar on Rosh Hashana and use a Lulav on Sukkos?
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
asked 6 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
|
show 2 more comments
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
asked 6 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
asked 6 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
purim-torah-in-jest
asked 6 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
asked 6 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
asked 6 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
asked 6 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
asked 6 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
903212
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
5 hours ago
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
5 hours ago
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 30 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
26 mins ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 3 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 8 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 35 mins ago
AsherAsher
995
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 30 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
26 mins ago
add a comment |
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 30 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
26 mins ago
add a comment |
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 30 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 30 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
answered 30 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
answered 30 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
answered 30 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
45.1k369201
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
26 mins ago
add a comment |
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
26 mins ago
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
26 mins ago
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
26 mins ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 3 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
3 hours ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 3 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
3 hours ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 3 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 3 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
answered 3 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
answered 3 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
answered 3 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
111k8178425
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
3 hours ago
add a comment |
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
3 hours ago
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
3 hours ago
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 8 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 35 mins ago
AsherAsher
995
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 8 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 35 mins ago
AsherAsher
995
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 8 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 35 mins ago
AsherAsher
995
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 8 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 35 mins ago
AsherAsher
995
edited 8 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
edited 8 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
edited 8 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
22.3k154129
answered 35 mins ago
AsherAsher
995
answered 35 mins ago
AsherAsher
995
answered 35 mins ago
AsherAsher
995
995
add a comment |
add a comment |
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
5 hours ago