Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow long is reasonable to wait for reply from an editor?How much time should one spend refereeing a paper?Should I choose the same editor for two papers?Slightly revised version of submitted paper two days afterwards: will the editor be annoyed?Referee report ignored and not sent to authorsFirstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Elsevier Editorial System: is this scam?Editor is asking for two referees and single columnResubmitting a Paper to a Mathematics Journal After Questionable RejectionHow is the Journal for an annual Review Chosen
Chain wire methods together in Lightning Web Components
Why is information "lost" when it got into a black hole?
Method for adding error messages to a dictionary given a key
Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?
INSERT to a table from a database to other (same SQL Server) using Dynamic SQL
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?
Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?
Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?
Why doesn't UK go for the same deal Japan has with EU to resolve Brexit?
Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?
Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
Unclear about dynamic binding
Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?
Domestic-to-international connection at Orlando (MCO)
A Man With a Stainless Steel Endoskeleton (like The Terminator) Fighting Cloaked Aliens Only He Can See
Are police here, aren't itthey?
Proper way to express "He disappeared them"
Running a General Election and the European Elections together
What is the value of α and β in a triangle?
Does it make sense to invest money on space investigation?
Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow long is reasonable to wait for reply from an editor?How much time should one spend refereeing a paper?Should I choose the same editor for two papers?Slightly revised version of submitted paper two days afterwards: will the editor be annoyed?Referee report ignored and not sent to authorsFirstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Elsevier Editorial System: is this scam?Editor is asking for two referees and single columnResubmitting a Paper to a Mathematics Journal After Questionable RejectionHow is the Journal for an annual Review Chosen
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but It'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the Editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
asked 4 hours ago
BabakBabak
1,4501827
add a comment |
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but It'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the Editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
asked 4 hours ago
BabakBabak
1,4501827
1
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
3 hours ago
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
39 mins ago
add a comment |
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but It'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the Editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
asked 4 hours ago
BabakBabak
1,4501827
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but It'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the Editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
journals peer-review review-articles
asked 4 hours ago
BabakBabak
1,4501827
asked 4 hours ago
BabakBabak
1,4501827
edited 12 mins ago
Babak
asked 4 hours ago
BabakBabak
1,4501827
asked 4 hours ago
BabakBabak
1,4501827
asked 4 hours ago
BabakBabak
1,4501827
1,4501827
1
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
3 hours ago
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
39 mins ago
add a comment |
1
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
3 hours ago
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
39 mins ago
1
1
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
3 hours ago
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
3 hours ago
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
39 mins ago
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
39 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered 1 hour ago
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.2k24215422
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
411
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered 1 hour ago
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.2k24215422
add a comment |
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered 1 hour ago
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.2k24215422
add a comment |
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered 1 hour ago
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.2k24215422
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered 1 hour ago
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.2k24215422
answered 1 hour ago
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.2k24215422
answered 1 hour ago
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.2k24215422
answered 1 hour ago
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.2k24215422
86.2k24215422
add a comment |
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
411
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
411
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
411
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
411
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
411
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
411
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
411
411
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
3 hours ago
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
39 mins ago